Channel
@kurosuLifeiscurious
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002601065186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kurosuLifeiscurious |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kurosuLifeiscurious |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 48 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 48 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5280655233800766638 | 21 | 36.2% | |
| custom 5325704278185110497 | 12 | 20.7% | |
| custom 5280613469538777463 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 8.62% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 5.17% | |
| custom 5285315470885423327 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5325778409320638497 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5213205542670971402 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| custom 5283108093918478713 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| custom 5399932170737306452 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.72% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 17 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🌟❌❌❌ 📹❌ ❌ 🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩 𝗡𝗲𝘄 υⲏⲧⲉⲣⲃью Гость нашей студии - . Данте (Данфер). Информация внтури интервью может быть неактуальна. 【Читать】 📰 🖋 Редактор - Райз 💻 Интервьюер - Ёна 🎙 Актёр озвучивания - Рина Своë мнение можете оставить в комментариях. Музыка - Telephones (vacations) This might be interesting, read it. 📰
❤2🍓2💋1
Выкладывать интервью?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
' " Ëна ... 🤩 ... К сожалению, пришло время закрыть этот проект. Если быть точнее, время пришло давно, но что-то пошло не так. Из комьюнити я "ушла" ещё осенью из-за личных проблем, надеялась вернуться и восстановить куросу. Но его жизнь прошла. Может быть в будущем, я покажу вам своё новое детище. У нас уже с октября валяется интервью с Данте, нынешний Данфер. Хотите ли вы прочитать это интервью напоследок?
💔5
подавали уже анкеты? ' " Ëна ... 🤩 ... Нет💔. Но времени ещё очень мало прошло, поэтому не опускаем рук.
custom 52806134695387774633
🌟🌟❌❌❌ 📹❌ ❌ 🌟🌟 🤩 𝗢𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 ⲥⲧⲟⲣⲟⲏⲁ эⲕⲣⲁⲏⲁ ⏰ День, когда вы можете задать свои вопросы администрации или же просто пообщаться. 🤩【Ёна】- настраивает лень. 🤩【Рина】- сбежала с работы. 🤩【Райз】- сбежал с работы. 🗣️ Отвечает - настраивает технику. ⚙️ Не отвечает - сбежал(а) с работы. 𝖠𝗌𝗄 𝖺𝗇𝗒𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎. 🤔
custom 53257784093206384972
' " Ëна ... 🤩 ... Всем доброго времени суток! Благодарю за 70 подписчиков, я очень рада, что мы пришли к этой цифре и буду стремиться к большему. ❤️❤️ Так же хочу напомнить про набор в администрацию.
custom 52806552338007666383
🌟🌟❌❌❌ 📹❌ ❌ 🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩 𝗤𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲 ⲩⲥⲡⲉⲭⲁ 🗣️ — Не поддавайтесь страхам своего разума. Руководствуйтесь мечтами в своем сердце. Рой Т. Беннетт 👤
custom 53257042781851104972
{ 🌟 } — Доброго дня, дорогие мои. Я с администрацией решили, что каналу лучше уйти в рест потому что мы готовим для вас что то интересное, а сил на интервью/обзоры нет. ❌С любовью, издательство 𝑭.𝑬. . .
custom 53257042781851104973
' " Ëна ... 🤩 ... Ждëм ваших анкет. Пожалуйста, подайте заявку хоть кто-нибудь....
custom 52806552338007666383
🌟🌟❌❌❌ 📹❌ ❌ 🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩 𝗦𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝗻 ⲁⲇⲙυⲏ-ⲥⲟⲥⲧⲁⲃ 👤 Административные должности, нуждающиеся студии: Редактор на утреннюю смену (до 14:00 по московскому времени) 🔥 0/1 ♥️ Анкета: 1. Ваш юзернейм, псевдоним, местоимения, часовой пояс. 2. Должность. 3. Есть ли у Вас опыт? Если да, то какой? 4. Оцените свою грамотность по десятибалльной шкале. 5. Почему Вы захотели стать администратором в нашем…
custom 52806552338007666383custom 52806134695387774632❤1
🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩 📹🤩 🤩🤩🌟🌟 🤩🤩 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗲 ⲡⲉⳡⲉⲏьⲉ 🃏 День, когда вы можете получить "печенье с предсказанием". Ниже будут представлены сами "печеньки" в виде кнопок. Почувствуйте, к какой Вас тянет и нажмите. Там будет написано предсказание, совет или же какой-то знак для Вас. Все выборы разложены на таро. 🌙 Таролог - Рина 𝖯𝖾𝗋𝗁𝖺𝗉𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗋. ♥️
custom 52806134695387774632
🌟🌟❌❌❌ 📹🤩 🤩 🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩 𝗡𝗲𝘄 ⲡⲁⲣⲧⲏёⲣ С этого момента в рядах наших партнёров находятся "⌞ 🌸 ⌝ 𝑭𝑳𝑶𝑹𝑨𝑳 𝑬𝑷𝑰𝑺𝑻𝑳𝑬𝑺. . .". 💭 𝖬𝗎𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗂𝗇 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌. 🤝
custom 52806552338007666384custom 52132055426709714021custom 52831080939184787131custom 53257042781851104971custom 53999321707373064521
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kurosuLifeiscurious. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выкладывать интервью?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
... Комментарии интервьюера в статье. Ваше мнение?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
... Рубрика "печенье с предсказанием". Ваше мнение?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
... Видео-баннер к новому интервью. Ваше мнение?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
...Добавление вопросов, не касающихся самих проектов гостей. Ваше мнение?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 17 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 149,515 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kurosuLifeiscurious named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Закрыто. 𐌺ᥙ𝖱᧐sᥙ ⁺ | жизнь любопытна” (@kurosuLifeiscurious), 48 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kurosuLifeiscurious.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.