Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NEW KURDISTAN

Channel

NEW KURDISTAN

@kurdistanNew2022

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

327subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749210595
TypeChannel
Username@kurdistanNew2022
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kurdistanNew2022

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@kurdistanNew2022/12019 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC@sasanshaer13/72073 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC0.992 minutes
@kurdistanNew2022/12022 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC@sasanshaer13/72104 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC0.994 minutes
@kurdistanNew2022/12017 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC@sasanshaer13/72053 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC0.992 minutes
@kurdistanNew2022/12027 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC@sasanshaer13/72175 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC0.994 minutes
@kurdistanNew2022/12029 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC@sasanshaer13/72195 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC0.992 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sasanshaer135 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992 minutesthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @kurdistanNew2022 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

315330322.56 August 2026 — 315 subscribers6 August 2026 — 315 subscribers7 August 2026 — 317 subscribers13 August 2026 — 320 subscribers21 August 2026 — 323 subscribers29 August 2026 — 326 subscribers5 September 2026 — 330 subscribers13 September 2026 — 327 subscribers3276 August 202613 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 313–332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 16:21327-3
5 Sept 2026, 00:57330+4
29 Aug 2026, 01:55326+3
21 Aug 2026, 05:13323+3
13 Aug 2026, 13:58320+3
7 Aug 2026, 14:32317+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:16315no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:17315first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1263.2%
421.1%
🥰210.5%
👍15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC102 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پست ٧٢ مادها چرا در حافظه تاریخی کوردها این‌قدر مهم‌اند؟ مادها یکی از گره‌های اصلی کتاب کورد کیه (سۆران حمە ڕەش)؟ هستند. بخش مادها از نام، خاستگاه، جغرافیا، تاریخ فرمانروایی، پیوند زبان مادی با کردی و فرهنگ مادی–کردی حرف می‌زند. در این خوانش، مادها فقط یک قوم باستانی دور نیستند، یکی از حلقه‌های جدی برای فهم پیوند کورد با زاگرس و فلات غربی‌اند. -نامهای کلیدی هم مهم اند: دیاکو/دیااکو، فرورتیش، هووخشتره/کیاکسار، ایشت

3🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC98 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‍ ‍ #کوردستان #سەربەخۆیی ☀ (لەسەر بەرزایی دونیای کوردی و مروڤنیشتمان کوردی) دونیای کوردی دونیای ڕەخنەس. وەڕاسی کە مانای مروڤنیشتمان کورد، خاک کوردستانە. ویرکردنەوە یانی پرسیاری و لاداێن ڕۊمەت ڕاساێەتی و ڕاسی. یەکێک وە بنیایل و بنەوایل ڕەخنە گردن، ژنەفتن ڕوانگەیل دژ وە ئیمەس، بێ ئاکو و بێ مەرج. ☀️☀️میدیا ئێوەین. ئەگەر پەسندی دەکەن، بینێرن بۆ هاوڕێیانی خۆتان رسانە شمایید: اگر می پسندید ،برای دوستانتان بفرستید https

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC29 viewsread 6 August 2026

پست ٧١ چرا باید تاریخ کورد را از زاگرس و میان‌رودان شروع کنیم، نه از مرزهای امروز؟ اگر تاریخ کورد را از مرزهای امروز شروع کنیم، از همان قدم اول توی تله می‌افتیم. چون مرزهای امروز، محصول دولت‌های جدیدند، اما تاریخ کورد، قدیمی‌تر از این خط‌کشی‌هاست. -کتاب کورد کیه (سۆران حمە ڕەش)؟ دقیقاً از همین‌جا شروع می‌کند: -کورد را نه یک قوم تازه‌پیدا، نه یک جمعیت بی‌ریشه، بلکه در پیوستار زاگرس و میان‌رودان می‌نشاند، یعنی جایی ک

5 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‍ ‍ #کوردستان #سەربەخۆیی ☀ (لەسەر بەرزایی دونیای کوردی و مروڤنیشتمان کوردی) دونیای کوردی دونیای ڕەخنەس. وەڕاسی کە مانای مروڤنیشتمان کورد، خاک کوردستانە. ویرکردنەوە یانی پرسیاری و لاداێن ڕۊمەت ڕاساێەتی و ڕاسی. یەکێک وە بنیایل و بنەوایل ڕەخنە گردن، ژنەفتن ڕوانگەیل دژ وە ئیمەس، بێ ئاکو و بێ مەرج. ☀️☀️میدیا ئێوەین. ئەگەر پەسندی دەکەن، بینێرن بۆ هاوڕێیانی خۆتان رسانە شمایید: اگر می پسندید ،برای دوستانتان بفرستید https

4 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC32 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

▪️مقاله وزارت علوم ▪️درجه علمی‌پژوهشی 📖زبان: انگلیسی 📑مجله: تحلیل گفتمان 📝موضوع: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Literature and Linguistics Scholars’ Views on Linguistic Diversity #عادل_محمدی اگر pfd دانلود نشد، از لینک زیر دانلود کنید:👇 https://lda.uok.ac.ir/article_64082.html?lang=en ‍ ‍ #کوردستان #سەربەخۆیی ☀ (لەسەر بەرزایی دونیای کوردی و مروڤنیشتمان کوردی) دونیای کوردی دونیای ڕەخنەس. وەڕاسی کە مانای مروڤ

👏21🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پست ٧٠ چرا شناخت نام‌های باستانی باید به بازسازی آینده کوردستان کمک کند؟ شناخت نام‌هایی مثل ماد، گوتی، کاسی، هوری، میتانی، ماننا، کاردوخ، کوردوئن و آدیابن فقط برای افتخار نیست. اگر این نام‌ها را درست بفهمیم، به ما کمک می‌کنند بفهمیم کوردستان یک سرزمین بی‌ریشه نیست. اما اگر آن‌ها را فقط شعار کنیم، به درد آینده نمی‌خورند. تاریخ باید چراغ راه باشد، نه فقط قاب دیوار. کتاب کورد کیه (سۆران حمە ڕەش)؟ با آوردن چنین محورهای

👏2

4 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‍ ‍ #کوردستان #سەربەخۆیی ☀ (لەسەر بەرزایی دونیای کوردی و مروڤنیشتمان کوردی) دونیای کوردی دونیای ڕەخنەس. وەڕاسی کە مانای مروڤنیشتمان کورد، خاک کوردستانە. ویرکردنەوە یانی پرسیاری و لاداێن ڕۊمەت ڕاساێەتی و ڕاسی. یەکێک وە بنیایل و بنەوایل ڕەخنە گردن، ژنەفتن ڕوانگەیل دژ وە ئیمەس، بێ ئاکو و بێ مەرج. ☀️☀️میدیا ئێوەین. ئەگەر پەسندی دەکەن، بینێرن بۆ هاوڕێیانی خۆتان رسانە شمایید: اگر می پسندید ،برای دوستانتان بفرستید https

4 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پست ٦٩ آدیابن یا حدیاب چه ربطی به شناخت کوردستان دارد؟ آدیابن یا حدیاب یکی از نام‌های مهم تاریخی در شمال میان‌رودان است، منطقه‌ای که با اربیل و پیرامون آن پیوند دارد و در تاریخ دینی، سیاسی و فرهنگی منطقه جایگاه مهمی داشته است. در کتاب کورد کیه (سۆران حمە ڕەش)؟ هم در فهرست به #آدیابن_حدیاب اشاره شده که نشان می‌دهد نویسنده این لایه تاریخی را برای شناخت کوردها مهم می‌داند. -چرا این مهم است؟ -چون آدیابن نشان می‌دهد هول

👏1

4 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC43 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‍ ‍ #کوردستان #سەربەخۆیی ☀ (لەسەر بەرزایی دونیای کوردی و مروڤنیشتمان کوردی) دونیای کوردی دونیای ڕەخنەس. وەڕاسی کە مانای مروڤنیشتمان کورد، خاک کوردستانە. ویرکردنەوە یانی پرسیاری و لاداێن ڕۊمەت ڕاساێەتی و ڕاسی. یەکێک وە بنیایل و بنەوایل ڕەخنە گردن، ژنەفتن ڕوانگەیل دژ وە ئیمەس، بێ ئاکو و بێ مەرج. ☀️☀️میدیا ئێوەین. ئەگەر پەسندی دەکەن، بینێرن بۆ هاوڕێیانی خۆتان رسانە شمایید: اگر می پسندید ،برای دوستانتان بفرستید https

3 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پست ٦٨ کوردوئن یا گوردیئن چرا برای پیوند تاریخ و جغرافیا مهم است؟ نام‌هایی مثل #کوردوئن_گوردیئن_گوردنه در بحث‌های تاریخی کوردی زیاد دیده می‌شوند. در کتاب کورد کیه (سۆران حمە ڕەش)؟ هم در فهرست به چنین نام‌هایی اشاره شده است. این نام‌ها برای کوردها مهم‌اند چون میان جغرافیای تاریخی، منابع کلاسیک، و حافظه نام کوردی پلی می‌زنند. اهمیت این نام‌ها در این است که نشان می‌دهند در شمال میان‌رودان و پیرامون کوهستان‌های کوردستا

👏1

3 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC40 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‍ ‍ #کوردستان #سەربەخۆیی ☀ (لەسەر بەرزایی دونیای کوردی و مروڤنیشتمان کوردی) دونیای کوردی دونیای ڕەخنەس. وەڕاسی کە مانای مروڤنیشتمان کورد، خاک کوردستانە. ویرکردنەوە یانی پرسیاری و لاداێن ڕۊمەت ڕاساێەتی و ڕاسی. یەکێک وە بنیایل و بنەوایل ڕەخنە گردن، ژنەفتن ڕوانگەیل دژ وە ئیمەس، بێ ئاکو و بێ مەرج. ☀️☀️میدیا ئێوەین. ئەگەر پەسندی دەکەن، بینێرن بۆ هاوڕێیانی خۆتان رسانە شمایید: اگر می پسندید ،برای دوستانتان بفرستید https

3 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پست٦٧ کاردوخ‌ها چرا در حافظهٔ سیاسی کوردها مهم شده‌اند؟ نام کاردوخ‌ها یا کاردوخی‌ها در بسیاری از بحث‌های تاریخی مربوط به کوردها مطرح می‌شود. این نام به‌ویژه به خاطر روایت‌های کلاسیک یونانی و بحث عبور نیروها از مناطق کوهستانی شهرت دارد. در کتاب کورد کیه (سۆران حمە رەش)؟ هم بحث نام‌های تاریخی و پیوندهای مربوط به کاردوخ/کوردوئن در فهرست دیده می‌شود. -چرا کاردوخ‌ها مهم‌اند؟ -چون در روایت تاریخی، تصویری از مردمان کوهستا

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kurdistanNew2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NEW KURDISTAN” (@kurdistanNew2022), 327 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kurdistanNew2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.