Мы с Йоги Джи👳♂️ поздравляем всех С Новым Годом!🎄 Пусть Новый год будет полон счастья, радости и благодарности💜🙏 Мой 2025 был прекрасен, поэтому есть только один вопрос-пожелание: а как может быть еще лучше?😍 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
❤7🕊4🎄2🙏1

Channel
@kundalini_violetta
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
292subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001580806406 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kundalini_violetta |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kundalini_violetta |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 292 | -1 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 293 | -3 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 296 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 295 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 296 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 297 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 298 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 298 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 8 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 19.4% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 9.71% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 9.71% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 7.77% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 6.80% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 5.83% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы с Йоги Джи👳♂️ поздравляем всех С Новым Годом!🎄 Пусть Новый год будет полон счастья, радости и благодарности💜🙏 Мой 2025 был прекрасен, поэтому есть только один вопрос-пожелание: а как может быть еще лучше?😍 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
❤7🕊4🎄2🙏1
Вот, чем я занимаюсь большую часть времени🎹 Помимо йоги, конечно 😁 Последний кавер мой любимый♥️ Во-первых, КиШ я люблю со школьных времен, а во-вторых, я там пою академ вокалом и даже попадаю в ноты😄
👍5🔥5❤3
Сюрреализм - это не только сексуальный подтекст (как у Дали), или странные абстракции (как у Миро), или плакатные загадки (как у Магритта, которого непременно обожать♥️), это еще удивительные магические сюжеты женщин-художниц🤩 В Мексике этим трем дамам дали прозвище «Три ведьмы сюрреализма». Ремедиос Варо, Леонора Каррингтон, Кати Хорн - каждая по воле судьбы в середине 20 века оказалась в Мексике, где они стали тво…
❤🔥5👍4👏2
«Это принцесса, а не то, что вы подумали!» - наверное, так кричал Константин Бранкузи, когда его работу исключили из Салона независимых за непристойность🔞 Потом, конечно, он объяснял, что это женщина, которая любуется собой, глядя в зеркало (ну, неужели, вы не видите!) 👀 А то, что эта женщина - Мари Бонапарт - последовательница Фрейда, так это чистой воды совпадение! Или нет?😈 Скульптура Константина Бранкузи «При…
😁8😱4👍3😈1
😽😸😻
❤6🔥5🐳2❤🔥1💋1
Ладно, я поняла, это было слишком легко🙈 Но свой ответ все-таки выложу, не зря же я его писала)) Конечно же, шквалу негативных отзывов подверглась «Неизвестная» И.Крамского🖼️ Картина была выставлена на 11 выставке Товарищества передвижников. И современникам было сразу очевидно, кто изображен. Не в смысле конкретного человека (тут есть разные версии, я склоняюсь к тому, что это собирательный образ), а в контексте ро…
💯7❤3🍓2
Итак, большей критике подверглась👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Пока я не нырнула еще в пучину современного искусства, небольшая загадка из истории, надеюсь, не слишком простая🙃 В спойлере спрятаны 2 картины, написанные во второй половине 19 века. Как вы думаете, какая из них оказалась более скандальной и вызвала бурю негативных эмоций у публики? Будет здорово, если объясните, почему вы так думаете😊 Только без подсказок интернета и ии-помощников🐇
👍2👀1
Изучаем сейчас русское искусство на курсе по искусствоведению, это, безусловно, большая любовь♥️ и море информации, которую еще раскладывать и раскладывать по полочкам🧠 В каждой домашней работе у нас есть творческое задание, и в уроке по русским пейзажам надо было выбрать картину знакомую с детства и написать небольшое сочинение. Мой выбор пал на Саврасова и его грачей. В детстве увидела их где-то, не помню уже где…
😍10😢5😭2❤1🕊1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kundalini_violetta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Итак, большей критике подверглась👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СДЕЛАЙ КУНДАЛИНИ😋” (@kundalini_violetta), 292 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kundalini_violetta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.