Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СДЕЛАЙ КУНДАЛИНИ😋

Channel

СДЕЛАЙ КУНДАЛИНИ😋

@kundalini_violetta

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

292subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001580806406
TypeChannel
Username@kundalini_violetta
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kundalini_violetta

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2922982957 August 2026 — 298 subscribers8 August 2026 — 298 subscribers14 August 2026 — 297 subscribers30 August 2026 — 296 subscribers9 September 2026 — 295 subscribers18 September 2026 — 296 subscribers2 October 2026 — 293 subscribers13 October 2026 — 292 subscribers7 August 202613 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 67 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 291–299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 00:57292-1
2 Oct 2026, 15:56293-3
18 Sept 2026, 03:41296+1
9 Sept 2026, 21:36295-1
30 Aug 2026, 23:17296-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:26297-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:03298no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:21298first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 12s
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 8 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2019.4%
👍1413.6%
🔥109.71%
😍109.71%
😁87.77%
💯76.80%
❤‍🔥65.83%
🕊54.85%
😢54.85%
😱43.88%
🍓21.94%
🎄21.94%
🐳21.94%
👏21.94%
😭21.94%
👀10.971%
💋10.971%
😈10.971%
🙏10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 15:18 UTC183 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Мы с Йоги Джи👳‍♂️ поздравляем всех С Новым Годом!🎄 Пусть Новый год будет полон счастья, радости и благодарности💜🙏 Мой 2025 был прекрасен, поэтому есть только один вопрос-пожелание: а как может быть еще лучше?😍 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

❤7🕊4🎄2🙏1

20 Dec 2025, 12:38 UTC221 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Вот, чем я занимаюсь большую часть времени🎹 Помимо йоги, конечно 😁 Последний кавер мой любимый♥️ Во-первых, КиШ я люблю со школьных времен, а во-вторых, я там пою академ вокалом и даже попадаю в ноты😄

👍5🔥5❤3

20 Nov 2025, 07:11 UTC272 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сюрреализм - это не только сексуальный подтекст (как у Дали), или странные абстракции (как у Миро), или плакатные загадки (как у Магритта, которого непременно обожать♥️), это еще удивительные магические сюжеты женщин-художниц🤩 В Мексике этим трем дамам дали прозвище «Три ведьмы сюрреализма». Ремедиос Варо, Леонора Каррингтон, Кати Хорн - каждая по воле судьбы в середине 20 века оказалась в Мексике, где они стали тво…

❤‍🔥5👍4👏2

11 Nov 2025, 15:18 UTC230 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Это принцесса, а не то, что вы подумали!» - наверное, так кричал Константин Бранкузи, когда его работу исключили из Салона независимых за непристойность🔞 Потом, конечно, он объяснял, что это женщина, которая любуется собой, глядя в зеркало (ну, неужели, вы не видите!) 👀 А то, что эта женщина - Мари Бонапарт - последовательница Фрейда, так это чистой воды совпадение! Или нет?😈 Скульптура Константина Бранкузи «При…

😁8😱4👍3😈1

7 Nov 2025, 18:29 UTC219 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

😽😸😻

❤6🔥5🐳2❤‍🔥1💋1

20 Oct 2025, 18:06 UTC291 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ладно, я поняла, это было слишком легко🙈 Но свой ответ все-таки выложу, не зря же я его писала)) Конечно же, шквалу негативных отзывов подверглась «Неизвестная» И.Крамского🖼️ Картина была выставлена на 11 выставке Товарищества передвижников. И современникам было сразу очевидно, кто изображен. Не в смысле конкретного человека (тут есть разные версии, я склоняюсь к тому, что это собирательный образ), а в контексте ро…

💯7❤3🍓2

20 Oct 2025, 14:56 UTC178 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Итак, большей критике подверглась👇

  1. И.Крамской «Неизвестная» 1883 год61%
  2. А.Кабанель «Рождение Венеры» 1863 год39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Oct 2025, 14:56 UTC176 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока я не нырнула еще в пучину современного искусства, небольшая загадка из истории, надеюсь, не слишком простая🙃 В спойлере спрятаны 2 картины, написанные во второй половине 19 века. Как вы думаете, какая из них оказалась более скандальной и вызвала бурю негативных эмоций у публики? Будет здорово, если объясните, почему вы так думаете😊 Только без подсказок интернета и ии-помощников🐇

👍2👀1

18 Sept 2025, 10:33 UTC254 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Изучаем сейчас русское искусство на курсе по искусствоведению, это, безусловно, большая любовь♥️ и море информации, которую еще раскладывать и раскладывать по полочкам🧠 В каждой домашней работе у нас есть творческое задание, и в уроке по русским пейзажам надо было выбрать картину знакомую с детства и написать небольшое сочинение. Мой выбор пал на Саврасова и его грачей. В детстве увидела их где-то, не помню уже где…

😍10😢5😭2❤1🕊1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kundalini_violetta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Oct 2025, 14:56 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Итак, большей критике подверглась👇

  1. И.Крамской «Неизвестная» 1883 год61%
  2. А.Кабанель «Рождение Венеры» 1863 год39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СДЕЛАЙ КУНДАЛИНИ😋” (@kundalini_violetta), 292 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kundalini_violetta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.