Channel
@kukozhikk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002439066074 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kukozhikk |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kukozhikk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 93 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 95 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 95 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 96 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
87 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5469655033438029870 | 44 | 50.6% | |
| custom 5249009601231224691 | 41 | 47.1% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 2.30% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Всё-таки я приняла решение закрыть данный канал и ПЕРЕЕХАТЬ в новый. Этот я оставлю как архив, потому что вроде как есть те, кто не хотел, чтобы данный канал удалялся. На новом канале я ПОКА ЧТО НЕ АКТИВНА, его ещё подготавливаю и всё такое, ну вроде на этом всё. НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ ЗДЕСЬ
🖕2
Пжпж оч надо 🤩
custom 52490096012312246913
Кто нибудь ещё хочет полноценнку за 300 по плечи? Либо по пояс за 500 могу
custom 52490096012312246915
Мы с дурой снова накурились #скетч
custom 52490096012312246917custom 54696550334380298707
Один персонаж?
custom 54696550334380298708custom 52490096012312246916
Зададки будущего редизайна
custom 52490096012312246911
Снова магма с мефедронихой, сегодня все секс #скетч
custom 54696550334380298709custom 52490096012312246911
>; ну сё, чу8аки, час настал мне зернадцать 🎉🎉 #полноцен_очка #сона
custom 52490096012312246915custom 54696550334380298704
Я ваще планирую нормально расписать весь лор когда всё сдам и сделать очередной полный редиз, скорее всего лор проекта сильно изменится
custom 52490096012312246911
РЕДИЗАЙН СРОЧНО 😱😱😱😱😰😰😰😰😱😰😱😱😰😱💀💀😰😱😱😰😰💀💀
custom 54696550334380298703custom 52490096012312246911
Вы бы читали комикс где все чибики?
custom 52490096012312246911
Это моя любимая часть
custom 54696550334380298705custom 52490096012312246912
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kukozhikk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,385,158 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KUKOZH” (@kukozhikk), 93 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kukozhikk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.