Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

rave mode

@ktxalol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

111subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001664889290
TypeChannel
Username@ktxalol
Descriptionканал умер
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ktxalol

Growth

1118 Aug 2026, 16:46 — 111 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:02 — 111 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:469 Aug 2026, 07:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:02111no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:46111first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
207
Videos
49
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 30s
Average length
10m 30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52921114491774697338825.8%
custom 52492629184023250974412.9%
custom 52201435813013226983911.4%
349.97%
custom 5364027055891558408308.80%
custom 5364047044669352421308.80%
custom 5366594982478094314205.87%
❤‍🔥144.11%
custom 5386614160052212011123.52%
👀82.35%
👻82.35%
💋82.35%
custom 534131532466489558330.88%
💔30.88%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
182
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 9 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
168
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ktxalol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 February 2026 to 22 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC141 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я хочу, чтоб ты никогда не умерла чтоб гуляла сквозь века, будто через зеркала ❤️

custom 529211144917746973314custom 52201435813013226989custom 52492629184023250975custom 53640270558915584082

12 Jun 2026, 14:21 UTC221 views37 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

сдвг влог с пекина ура 🥳

custom 524926291840232509718custom 52201435813013226988custom 53640470446693524218custom 53640270558915584082💋1

3 Jun 2026, 01:01 UTC490 views32 reactions168 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

никогда не прекращайте творить ☺️ @emaefest

custom 536402705589155840813custom 52201435813013226989custom 529211144917746973381❤‍🔥1

4 May 2026, 09:53 UTC362 views35 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

стеклоблоки, стеклоблоки, я люблю стеклоблоки🦴

custom 524926291840232509717❤‍🔥9custom 52201435813013226985💔2custom 53640270558915584082

2 May 2026, 17:35 UTC276 views39 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤍небо и человек едины🤍

15custom 52921114491774697339custom 52201435813013226988custom 52492629184023250974💋3

1 May 2026, 02:14 UTC277 views35 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

BA BA BA BABANANA BA BA BA BABANANA BANANA NAAAA ☺️🌟☺️🌟☺️🌟☺️🌟☺️🌟

custom 529211144917746973318custom 536404704466935242184custom 53640270558915584083💋2

29 Apr 2026, 09:13 UTC261 views38 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

借山而居,借风而行 🐈

custom 529211144917746973319custom 536402705589155840887💋2custom 53640470446693524212

19 Apr 2026, 01:54 UTC302 views45 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

твоей персоны теперь нет ведь маски сняты, маски сняты ☕💊

custom 529211144917746973320👀8👻8custom 534131532466489558332❤‍🔥2custom 53640470446693524212

19 Feb 2026, 06:17 UTC679 views50 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

думайте. 🙂 ph: @phn_emae

custom 536659498247809431420custom 538661416005221201112custom 5364047044669352421105❤‍🔥2💔1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ktxalol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 837,144 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rave mode” (@ktxalol), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ktxalol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.