Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aseman

Channel

Aseman

@ktabhich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

287subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370345701
TypeChannel
Username@ktabhich
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ktabhich

Growth

2872892887 August 2026 — 287 subscribers7 August 2026 — 287 subscribers14 August 2026 — 289 subscribers21 August 2026 — 287 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 287–289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 16:22287-2
14 Aug 2026, 22:33289+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:32287no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:04287first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 287 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.3
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total412
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026

#پروست نشان داد که حافظه، آرشیوِ بی‌طرف نیست؛ کارگاهِ بازسازی است. برای همین است که بعد از بعضی جدایی‌ها تو دلتنگِ خودِ آدم نیستی؛ دلتنگِ روایتی هستی که از او در ذهن‌ات ساخته‌ای. نسخه‌ای که شاید هیچ‌وقت آن‌قدر کامل، آن‌قدر نجیب، آن‌قدر عمیق نبوده. دردِ ما همیشه از فقدان نیست؛ از زیباسازیِ فقدان هم هست. حافظه گاهی مرمت نمی‌کند، بت می‌سازد... @ktabhich

4 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026

خیلی‌ها با خشونت از بین نمی‌روند؛ با ملاحظه‌ی بیش از حد از بین می‌روند. همیشه کوتاه می‌آیند، همیشه می‌فهمند، همیشه سکوت می‌کنند که چیزی به‌هم نریزد. بعد یک روز می‌بینند چیزی که به‌هم ریخته، خودشان‌اند. نجابت اگر مرز نداشته باشد، فضیلت نیست؛ خودفرساییِ شیک است. از آن مدل مرگ‌هایی که سر و صدا ندارند اما جسدش تا سال‌ها راه می‌رود... #آره @ktabhich

4 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026

جایی را ترک کردم که در آن خوشحال نبودم و ترک آنجا نیز مرا خوشحال نکرد، اما می‌دانستم، انسان در مکانی که بیمار شده هرگز درمان نمی‌شود... #عجب #رولان_بارت @ktabhich

4 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026

#کامو از زیستن در جهانی حرف می‌زد که همیشه مطابق میلِ ما معنا تولید نمی‌کند. شاید به همین دلیل، بالغ‌ترین نوعِ امید آن امیدی نیست که کور است؛ آن است که حقیقت را می‌بیند و باز هم تصمیم می‌گیرد فرو نریزد. خیلی‌ها به امید زنده نیستند؛ به انکار زنده‌اند. فرق دارد. امید می‌داند اوضاع بد است و می‌ماند. انکار اصلاً قبول ندارد اوضاع بد است. اولی شجاعت است. دومی فقط تأخیر در فروپاشی... @ktabhich

31 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026

دسته ps خواهرزادم خراب شده بود و داشت باهاش ور میرفت. به مامانم گفت مامانبزرگ دعا کن درست شه، مامانم شروع کردن صلوات فرستادن. بچه دید درست نشد گفت ولش کن مامانبزرگ فک کنم به خدا ربطی نداشت 😂 #فانی @ktabhich

31 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

آدم وقتی به قله می‌رسد تازه می‌فهمد اصلا قله‌ای در کار نیست. همسن‌وسال شما که بودم دیگر می‌دانستم هیچ چیز ارزش جنگیدن ندارد، و این تا مدت‌ها آرامم می‌کرد. بعد نگرانم کرد. حالا دوباره می‌ترسانَدم. یخبندان/ #توماس_برنهارت @ktabhich

31 Jul 2026, 04:36 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026

تا به کِی باشی گرفتار امید ناامیدی پیشه کن، آزاد باش #طغرای_مشهدی @ktabhich

31 Jul 2026, 04:34 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#گفت از آدمايى كه هميشه فكر مى كنن مشكل اصلى واكنش توئه نه رفتار خودشون ، فاصله بگيريد. حتى اگه دوستشون داريد ... @ktabhich

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC41 viewsread 7 August 2026

از رفتار اطرافیانت هیچ وقت ناراحت نشو... آدمها با رفتارشان بیشتر از آنکه تو را معرفی کنند ، خودشان را معرفی می کنند. #آره @ktabhich

30 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026

سوءتفاهمِ صمیمیت صمیمیت یعنی بتوانی خودت باشی؛ اما مشکل اینجاست که بیشتر آدم‌ها خودِ واقعیِ تو را تاب نمی‌آورند. تا وقتی جذابی، شنیده می‌شوی. تا وقتی مفیدی، خواسته می‌شوی. تا وقتی لبخند می‌زنی، دوست‌داشتنی به نظر می‌رسی. اما کافی‌ست پیچیدگی‌ات را نشان بدهی؛ خستگی‌ات را، تاریکی‌ات را، تردیدت را. آن‌وقت معلوم می‌شود چند نفر واقعاً آمده بودند برای خودِ تو. یونگ می‌فهمید که انسان فقط با چهره‌ی روشنش ساخته نشده؛ هرکس سای

29 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

در این مدت زندگی به گونه‌ای سپری شده است که میتوانم سالها بدون آنکه اتفاق غم‌انگیزی رخ بدهد،غمگین بمانم. #داستایوفسکی @ktabhich

29 Jul 2026, 04:02 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026

#شمـس_تبريزى: «انـدوه تمام نمى شود؛ توآن قدر وسيـع مى شوى، كه اندوه در تو گم مى شود. . . » @ktabhich

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ktabhich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aseman” (@ktabhich), 287 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ktabhich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.