Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💻 Константин Петров

Channel

💻 Константин Петров

@ksetrov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001998329455
TypeChannel
Username@ksetrov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ksetrov

Growth

5557568 August 2026 — 57 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55 subscribers23 August 2026 — 56 subscribers30 August 2026 — 57 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 15:0557+1
23 Aug 2026, 08:2456+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:3755-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:4657no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:5357first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 12 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.1%
avg views ÷ 57 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (12 December 20257 August 2026)
Views total56
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

147 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5738.8%
3221.8%
👍2617.7%
🕊1510.2%
🏆106.80%
💯64.08%
🌚10.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC21 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Стартапу нужно отставать от хайпа на 5 лет Мой тезка из Sequoia Capital, Константин Бюлер, выкатил отличный анализ: они прогнали данные Hacker News за последние 20 лет, чтобы сопоставить информационный хайп с реальными успехами бизнеса. Самыми успешными, как правило, становятся компании, занимающиеся совсем не той темой, которая «взрывает» инфополе в год их основания. К примеру, Airbnb появился, когда все обсуждали

👍53

4 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

О повсеместном сожжении токенов За последний год я написал ETL-процессор, собрал несколько упрощающих работу штуковин, которые раньше потребовали бы команду и раунд инвестиций. Сейчас это делается на фоне, между задачами, в одиночку. Поставить таким продуктам коммерческие цели мысли были, чего греха таить. Но пока это про "Мне теперь незачем оплачивать подписку сервиса N, ведь я собрал его аналог" А самый мощный к

52👍2

31 May 2026, 12:50 UTC139 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В спорте травма завершает карьеру, а в бизнесе-начинает

4🏆1💯1

14 Mar 2026, 06:48 UTC247 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Закончилось мое приключение вместе с 👍ПАЗЛ ДОМ Стартапы это интересно, динамично и непредсказуемо — поэтому работой назвать это не поворачивается язык, это было приключение, со всеми компонентами: * Амбициозная цель — оцифровать целую отрасль * Команда героев — разных, но прокачанных * Поход через темный лес — строительный сектор России в 2024-2025 году ...и крутые сюжетные повороты, можно сказать, клиффхэнгеры.

6👍2🌚1🏆1🕊1

5 Jan 2026, 07:23 UTC272 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Когда люди остаются активными до 80+, «финишная прямая» отодвигается на десятилетия, маркетинговая воронка превращается не в путь к покупке, а в бесконечную петлю лояльности. LTV становится только больше. Сегодня на примере Японии мы можем увидеть, как раскрывается тренд долгожительства, когда старение — это не про падение спроса, а про увеличение срока жизни, активное участие в экономике и превращение спроса в треб

5👍3🕊1

3 Jan 2026, 09:42 UTC176 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Мы принимаем совсем немного решений, которые действительно меняют нашу жизнь. Какую обувь купить? Какую машину? Какой телефон? Какой холодильник? Выбирай любой, через пару лет выбор не будет иметь значения. Но выбор, сделанный два года назад — попробую не пить хотя бы три месяца — действительно поменял мою жизнь. Почему перестал? Как и многие из нас, связывал отдых с выпивкой. Со старших классов это вошло в прив

94👍4

31 Dec 2025, 11:38 UTC125 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«Присутствовать на родах супруги» — можно было добавить в итоги года 🙂

51

31 Dec 2025, 11:38 UTC142 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @klesova_marinaPhoto

Мой 2025-й 🐻❤️ Спасибо, что исполнил главную мечту ❤️

11🏆5🕊51

21 Dec 2025, 07:52 UTC168 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вышло исследование на TechCrunch, на основе сервиса анализа мобильных приложений Sensor Tower. И цифры показывают, что эпоха легкого роста для OpenAI закончилась. Рынок ИИ-ассистентов переходит от фазы хайпа к фазе дистрибуции и продуктовых фич. Это логично: реален ИИ пузырь или нет, подход к технологии поменяется и траектория развития тоже. Ключевые инсайты: • Лидер выдыхается: ChatGPT всё еще царь горы (50% загр

53👍2

14 Dec 2025, 10:08 UTC147 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Итоги Года Часть 3/3 Год в медиа культуре мне тоже запомнился. Сериалы, если рассматривать понравившееся из того, что вышло в 2025, то: "Рай"/"Paradise", "Переходный возраст" от Netflix, "Pluribus" от создателя "Breaking Bad". Кроме того, понравились оба сезона "Platonic" и "Pokerface". Новых фильмов, кажется, посмотрел не так много. Точно рекомендую "Орудия" Зака Кригера и фильм про войну в Ираке Warfare. В пл

85🕊4🏆1

13 Dec 2025, 08:03 UTC130 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Итоги Года Часть 2/3 В разрезе личной жизни этот год никак не вписать и не измерить. Сколько ачивок, столько и противоположных явлений. Стать отцом, быть мужем. Потерять дорогого друга на СВО. Лучше узнать своих двоюродных и троюродных. Похоронить тестя. Встретить неизвестного ранее брата. Соскучиться по семье, распределенной по миру. Найти себя совсем другим человеком. Профессиональные задачи были самые разные.

👍84🕊4💯3

12 Dec 2025, 09:17 UTC108 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Итоги Года Писать отчет за двенадцать прошедших месяцев это скользкая дорожка. Обязательно что-то забуду! А в чем-то оценку себе ставить.. Ну вы понимаете. Но пройти по ней полезно. Часть 1/3 Путешествий было немного, не берем поездки в Москву. А кроме них, я впервые побывал ✨в Минске, и вообще в РБ. Посмотрел крепости Мир и Несвиж, поплавал в Спа, провел время с семьей. ✨в Ярославле. Красивый центр города, вкусн

62🏆2💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ksetrov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 505,282 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💻 Константин Петров” (@ksetrov), 57 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ksetrov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.