Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KSÄNA TLJ

Channel

KSÄNA TLJ

@kseniatelijj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

68subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001907653343
TypeChannel
Username@kseniatelijj
DescriptionSTYLIST FASHION DESIGNER: [GRAPHIC AND WEB] Для связи: @kseniatelij
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kseniatelijj

Growth

688 Aug 2026, 14:31 — 68 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:01 — 68 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:3110 Aug 2026, 01:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 01:0168no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:3168first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 28 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
118
Videos
20
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52737705687289826611816.1%
custom 51950597396370799501513.4%
custom 52224428920432494041311.6%
custom 53597399054360528221311.6%
custom 5296549082402158323119.82%
custom 5424721308925579602119.82%
custom 545646623684403351198.04%
custom 546567015419086776987.14%
custom 542512796501909354265.36%
custom 527381087270209245843.57%
custom 540210090588348823243.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC119 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026

таких милашек сделала 😮

custom 52224428920432494047custom 54247213089255796027custom 54251279650190935425custom 54656701541908677693

13 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC112 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sueta_teamSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

13 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC112 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sueta_teamSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

13 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC91 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sueta_teamSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

13 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC88 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sueta_teamPhoto

Пока все в погоне за миньонами из Rostics, а в Додо становятся феями Winx, мы решили не отставать и сделать свои игрушки для дизайнеров! Выбирайте, какую фигурку хотели бы себе в коллекцию, а мы пошли во Вкусно—и точка предлагать коллаборацию! Поможем им подсуетиться и обогнать конкурентов🔥 P.S.в комментариях вас ждут стикеры, сохраняете и отправляйте любимчика!

custom 54564662368440335117custom 53597399054360528224custom 54021009058834882324

27 Jun 2026, 18:29 UTC147 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

поздравления приветствуются🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴

custom 52224428920432494044custom 51950597396370799503custom 54564662368440335112

27 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC147 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

20 сег№Одня

custom 53597399054360528229custom 52737705687289826617custom 54656701541908677695

24 May 2026, 17:58 UTC251 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

НАСКОЛЬКО ХОРОШО ВЫ СЕБЯ ЗНАЕТЕ?🦴 Я лично начала замечать, что иногда люди себя как будто специально обманывают. И истинно не знают своего отношения к потреблению вещей...Именно состояние, что будут делать с вещью после покупки. Например: Ты покупаешь ОЧЕРЕДНОЙ новый блокнот, чтобы записывать в него что-то, имея при этом 10 блокнотов дома. И этот ты тоже не будешь использовать. Или реальная история, когда, при по

custom 51950597396370799508custom 52737705687289826617custom 52965490824021583235

30 Apr 2026, 17:27 UTC233 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @deusplatformVideo

Обновление на deusplatform.ru 🖱 Продолжаем постепенно развивать платформу – делаем ее удобнее, чтобы знакомство с авторами и изделиями приносило удовольствие 👀 Мы обновили главную страницу! Теперь с нее можно сразу перейти в раздел «Наши авторы» – там собрано более 70 авторов в разных категориях. Также на главной странице вы найдете: — популярные изделия платформы

custom 54247213089255796024custom 52224428920432494042custom 54251279650190935421

23 Mar 2026, 18:12 UTC244 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @NOMORETALKINGLOUISEPhoto

back//aftermind auxi/ ph: @kseniatelijj #Archive ⭐️⭐️

custom 52965490824021583236custom 52737705687289826614custom 52738108727020924584

28 Feb 2026, 08:55 UTC354 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сегодня щитпостинг. Ну как же изящно чувствует себя Gucci в руках Демны!

custom 51950597396370799504

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kseniatelijj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,267,787 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KSÄNA TLJ” (@kseniatelijj), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kseniatelijj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.