Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ксения Лемберг

Channel

Ксения Лемберг

@ksenialemberg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

573subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002187473693
TypeChannel
Username@ksenialemberg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ksenialemberg

Growth

5695735717 August 2026 — 570 subscribers8 August 2026 — 569 subscribers8 August 2026 — 569 subscribers15 August 2026 — 573 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 568–574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:43573+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:32569no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:04569-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:50570first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.5%
avg views ÷ 573 subscribers
Avg views / post
375
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,628
Reactions total185
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

350 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21060.0%
🔥8424.0%
👍4312.3%
🤣30.857%
🥰30.857%
❤‍🔥20.571%
👏20.571%
🥴20.571%
😁10.286%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 350reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC126 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В преддверии летних выходных решила посчитать, сколько говяжьего шашлыка, лосося и красного вина нужно съесть и выпить, чтобы действительно «оздоровиться». 😂

👍5🔥4🤣3🥴21😁1

3 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC286 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В этом году отпуск провожу в родовом гнезде в поселке Красное под Приозерском Лен. Области. Нашему дому почти 100 лет. Здесь живет 5 поколений нашей семьи с 1945 года. Дом видел многих знаменитых артистов и художников СССР - гостей моего прадеда народного художника РСФР Анатолия Федотовича Босулаева. На фото рекламный плакат, который 30 лет назад делал мой отец - основатель одного из первых рекламных и дизаин бюро на

27👍7🔥7

30 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC368 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я опять сдала 9 пробирок 🧪и 2❤️. И не потому, что мне нравится сдавать кровь (хотя наши медсестры ее берут виртуозно), а потому, что добралась наконец до метаболомного анализа. Если генетика отвечает на вопрос «что может случиться», то метаболомика показывает, что происходит в организме именно сейчас. Интересно проверить, отражаются ли мои привычки (спорт, питание, сон и все мои эксперименты с превентивной медициной)

21👍4

28 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC326 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Начала курс липосомальных глутатиона и коэнзима Q10. Вопреки расхожему мнению, липосомальные - не обязательно жидкие витамины, они могут быть и в капсулах, но главное это «жировая» оболочка, повышающая биодоступность (она выше в разы). Почему такой дуэт - читала исследование - на 🐁 от этой комбинации отличный синергитический эффект, назову эту парочку «детокс ради энергии». Знакомы с липосомальными формами? Пробовали

7👍6

27 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC332 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Просто прекрасный день встреч сегодня на работе в Атласе. Одна пациентка с моей подачи сделала пластику, другая пришла на чек-ап по своей страховке в Альфастраховании, третью записали на консультацию по перименопаузе, четвертая просто сказала спасибо мне за этот блог пока мы в лифте ехали. Я счастлива❤️

33🔥2🥰1

24 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC397 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥236

24 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC793 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, я нашла лучший косметологический уход за последние несколько лет. Вчера впервые попробовала профессиональный уход с NAD+. Эффект меня очень впечатлил. Кожа стала плотнее, свежее, появился тот самый «дорогой» здоровый блеск, который сложно получить просто хорошим кремом. По свежим следам разобрала состав. Модный NAD+ действительно есть в составе, а еще есть и три его предшественника — NMN, NR, NAM. Но я бы не

18👍7

11 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC531 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Случай из жизни 💉 Муж моей приятельницы — серьёзный человек из ИТ: команда, проекты, большая ответственность. Жена часто болеет, и врачи регулярно назначают ей уколы и капельницы. Можно было бы каждый раз вызывать медсестру или возить жену в процедурный кабинет. А можно поступить как он: окончить курсы «Внутривенные инъекции, инфузии и катетеризация периферических вен» и заботиться о любимой самому. Как там нынче мод

28🔥11🥰2

9 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC467 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Начинаю подготовку к менопаузе с 40 лет. К сожалению, в нашей стране еще пока нет устойчивой культуры подготовки женщин к этому непростому периоду, и пациентки часто пропускают окно возможностей. Я сама начала с простого: разобралась, какие анализы и обследования нужно пройти в моём возрасте. Собрала весь чек-лист по рекомендациям IMS, NAMS и РОАГ — прикрепляю файлом. Кстати, весь этот объём обследования можно пройт

22❤‍🔥2👍2

8 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC532 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚩 RED FLAG от Брайана Джонсона Самый измеряемый человек в мире, Брайан Джонсон, тратящий миллионы $$$ на биохакинг, официально заявил: Мой желудок ест сам себя У него аутоимунный гастрит. Диагноз, кстати, не такой и редкий, и его точно могли заподозрить раньше из-за

🔥13👍64👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ksenialemberg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,405,062 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ксения Лемберг” (@ksenialemberg), 573 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ksenialemberg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.