Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Команды в онлайне | Арихина Ксения

Channel

Команды в онлайне | Арихина Ксения

@kseniaarikhina

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,265subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525301318
TypeChannel
Username@kseniaarikhina
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kseniaarikhina

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2651,2731,2697 August 2026 — 1,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,269 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,270 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,273 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,272 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,271 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,270 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,267 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,268 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,267 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,265 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,264–1,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:591,265-2
14 Sept 2026, 10:161,267-1
10 Sept 2026, 18:391,268+1
2 Sept 2026, 05:041,267-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:161,270-1
27 Aug 2026, 10:151,271-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:351,272-1
14 Aug 2026, 05:581,273+3
11 Aug 2026, 00:481,270+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:311,269no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:461,269first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

489 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣12726.0%
😁11623.7%
9619.6%
🔥7014.3%
💯5210.6%
🤡71.43%
🙈51.02%
👍40.818%
👨‍💻20.409%
💔20.409%
😍20.409%
😱20.409%
10.204%
👏10.204%
👾10.204%
🥰10.204%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2025 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kseniaarikhina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 September 2025 to 17 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,420 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что происходит на рынке труда и чего ждать до конца года: мое мнение Каждый месяц hh.ru публикует отчет о рынке труда. Есть индекс HH (соотношение вакансий и резюме). Индекс выше 8 – высокий уровень конкуренции соискателей за рабочие места, рынок работодателя. Выше 12 – крайне высокий. А теперь посмотрим на цифры: Май 2023 — 3,3 Май 2024 — 5,6 Май 2025 — 8,2 Май 2026 — 9,1 В 2023 и 2024 году был рынок кандидата.

7🔥5👍4

12 Jun 2026, 16:31 UTC325 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Не берем, он даже не почитал, куда на собес пришел» У нас есть отдельная категория отказов от клиентов за то, что не познакомились с компанией Много ли таких? А вы задайте в начале собеседования вопрос «Удалось ли вам познакомиться с компанией? Чем она вас привлекла?» И услышите протяжное ээээ как минимум в 30% случаев) Те, кто не помнит, в какую компанию собеседуется или даже вакансию не изучил – таким мы и сами

8💯3😁2

28 May 2026, 09:48 UTC376 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Среди менеджеров по продажам есть отдельная категория – «ой-менеджеры» Все вакансии на МОПов у нас закрываются с холодного поиска HH, своей базы, рекомендаций от других мопов, выкуп у коллег, иногда доп.рабочие площадки. Но ни разу за последние пару лет не было хороших МОПов из ТГ. Даже из закрытых чатов и каналов с МОПами. Даже если закупить рекламу по чатам и каналам. Потому что из тг чаще всего приходят менедже

😁7💯4🤣2

27 Feb 2026, 15:16 UTC723 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naebnetPhoto

Парень отправил ИИ-аватара на собеседование с ИИ-эйчаром. Всю встречу оба просто соглашались друг с другом. Между ботами состоялся гениальный диалог: Интервьюер: Расскажите о себе Кандидат: Конечно! Я увлеченный профессионал, который преуспевает в динамичной среде И: Это действительно очень содержательный ответ К: Спасибо! Вы абсолютно правы И: Вы тоже абсолютно правы К: Вы абсолютно правы И: Мы оба абсолютно правы

🤣213😁3

17 Feb 2026, 08:40 UTC780 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Полгода назад собеседовали руководителя отдела маркетинга с зп 250 000+. Обоюдно не сошлись: ему после большого проекта не интересны задачи среднего проекта. Проекту — неприменим его опыт, нет смысла платить 250к+ за опыт, который ничего не принесёт. Спустя полгода — он возвращается к нам, готовый работать с нашими задачами и с зп от 150к. Ожидания и реальность на рынке не совпали. И дело даже не в том, что зарпла

17🔥7💯4💔2🤣2

16 Jan 2026, 09:25 UTC909 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Резюме на HH вместо мемов и стендапов 😃

🤣14😁8🔥3😱2

12 Jan 2026, 08:20 UTC921 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Стартовали год с 10+ вакансий в параллель и с потока входящих заявок на маркетологов. Помню, год назад или чуть больше была на консультации по кадровым агентствам и скромно говорила, что хочу постепенно прийти к 5 подборам в месяц. Мне казалось, это прям непростая задача. Потом погрузилась в работу, про цель в 5 подборов забыла, и в какой-то момент обнаружила, что у нас в команде по 13 подборов в параллель. Как ит

18🔥7😍2

26 Nov 2025, 11:49 UTC942 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интересное наблюдение: насколько важно стало трудоустройство по ТК Если еще год назад все кандидаты сами приходили и говорили: «У меня есть самозанятость или ИП, я готов работать по договору». То сейчас все чаще кандидаты отказываются от позиции, если нет возможности работать по ТК. Ну или между двумя офферами выберут тот, где есть трудоустройство по ТК, даже если там оффер меньше в деньгах. Вот он сильный запрос

🔥11💯96

25 Nov 2025, 17:43 UTC873 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока зарплаты на рынке падают — главное, чтобы не падала самооценка 🔥😂 Чувствую, пора отдельный канал мемов с HH заводить)

🤣10😁9🔥5

9 Oct 2025, 19:50 UTC≈1,360 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Суровые нынче кандидаты 😂

🤣60😁23🤡72🔥1

6 Oct 2025, 17:39 UTC≈1,300 views43 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Маркетолог должен уметь писать Я искренне не понимаю, почему так много маркетологов-стратегов, а писать что-то руками — это фу и понижение в должности. Извините, эта вакансия мне не подходит. Я больше маркетолог-стратег 🙈 Одни стратеги на рынке, а ручками никто не хочет) Да, маркетолог не должен писать руками. Здорово, чтобы у него были руки в виде SMM, или копирайтера, или хорошего редактора. Но УМЕТЬ писать — эт

💯23🔥136👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kseniaarikhina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Команды в онлайне | Арихина Ксения” (@kseniaarikhina), 1,265 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kseniaarikhina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.