Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ксана М | Автор | 18+

@ksanamm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

724subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669907508
TypeChannel
Username@ksanamm
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ksanamm

Growth

713724718.56 Aug 2026, 06:18 — 713 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:36 — 713 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:54 — 724 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 06:187 Aug 2026, 02:54
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 711–726 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:54724+11
6 Aug 2026, 16:36713no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:18713first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 724 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,002
Reactions total289
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

289 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13647.1%
🔥5318.3%
😍3512.1%
💔155.19%
❤‍🔥113.81%
🤗82.77%
💯72.42%
🥰72.42%
👍62.08%
🤣62.08%
😭51.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC37 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Напоминаю про наш с Аней розыгрыш ❤️

4🔥2😍1

6 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC55 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, могла ли быть жизнь без Никки. Но твердо понимаю, что совершенно не жил до нее. Она разукрашивает мой серый мир. Рисует в нем сотни цветных удивительных картин. Открывает мне глаза. Помогает вновь вспомнить, каково это - чувствовать. Желать. Мечтать. Любить… #ксанам #слепыекасания

7🔥4😍3

4 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC88 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lovebooks_0Photo

🤩🤩отзыв на книгу «мой 🤩🤩проклятый марс»:: #ксанам Сюжет книги невероятно милый, а главный герой — настоящий мужчина.🤩 Отношения между персонажами развиваются очень быстро и стремительно, но я даже не могу представить, как бы это могло быть иначе. Тем более, что драмы в их жизни хватает, чтобы поддерживать интерес. Стиль написания просто потрясающий — он такой легкий и непринужденный, что книга читается на одном дых

7🔥2😍1

2 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC122 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Хочу оставить свое впечатление о книге " Слепые касания " Ксаны М🤍 Эта история оставила приятное послевкусие 🤍 Я не могла оторваться от чтения ни на минуты , и всегда хотелось возвращаться к ней 🥰 Главные герои этой книги - Никки и Маккейн Она- художница, которая живет картинами, но случается этап, когда надо найти себя Он- спортсмен, более того горячий и опытный в самоконтроле Но что же их связало? Совершенно случ

😍11🔥32

2 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC107 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я просто надеюсь, что поднятие цен не станет для ребят препятствием, и у вас появится возможность в них влюбиться… 🤍 Ведь то, что сейчас происходит на ВБ не может не расстраивать… Касаниям не дали даже мизерного шанса 💔

💔15😭5🤗42

2 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC101 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я это сделала !!!🤍 Я дочитала шикарную книгу, ту которую должен прочитать каждый , в независимости где вы находитесь🥹😍🔥😍🔥😍🔥 #читаювместесЭлли

10🥰2😍1

2 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC108 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Моя бомбита!!!! Книга выйдет с моим блербом 🤍 🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶 «План мести — план любви» официально отправляется в печать в издательстве Dreambook!! До сих пор не верится, что история, которая так долго жила только в моем ноутбуке, совсем скоро станет настоящей книгой 🤍 #джулиякертисс #планместипланлюбви #пмпл 🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶🪶 Инстаграм Юли Тик-ток Канал в ТГ Офици

10🔥3😍3

2 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC112 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌸 СЛЕПЫЕ КАСАНИЯ 🤩 Ксана М  ― Может, лучше поговорим о нас? ― спрашивает, и я сглатываю. ― Нет никаких нас. ― Мы целовались, ― прет напрямик. ― Это была ошибка. ― Тройная? ― Люди от природы глупы. ― Чувства ― не глупость. ― Майкл… ― Никки, ― обрывает полушепотом. И хочу отступить, но, видимо, уже давно делаю это по инерции, так как всего после одного невинного рывка внезапно оказываюсь прижата к борту. Маккейн запи

10🔥4🥰3😍2

1 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC112 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ну вы поняли, да? 👆😆 🤩 Кто ещё не купил? 😏

11😍3🥰2

1 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC107 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я на 233 странице и ужас как злюсь на этих двоих - они просто нечто, хочется и запереть их вдвоём в одной комнате , и вообще обоих отправить в разные страны 😂😂😂 #читаювместесЭлли

🔥124🤣2

1 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC100 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Еще больше полюбила Сейджа - того , кто так трепетно и нежно называет ее "тыковка" , и у них такие тёплые и дружеские отношения!!! Дайте мне пожалуйста такого Сейджа 🥹🔥🔥 #читаювместесЭлли

11😍3🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC102 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я просто обожаю эту парочку))) Маккейн и Никки - просто 2 огня, которые встретились в одном костре и никак не могут потушить этот пыл внутри себя 😉 #читаювместесЭлли

7😍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ksanamm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 354,139 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ксана М | Автор | 18+” (@ksanamm), 724 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ksanamm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.