📍 MetaMask Agent Wallet startet und lässt KI-Agenten selbst on-chain handeln MetaMask hat die Agent Wallet am 6. August 2026 aus dem geschlossenen Testbetrieb geholt. KI-Agenten wie Claude Code, Codex oder Cursor dürfen damit eigenständig Transaktionen auf Hyperliquid und EVM-Chains auslösen, aber nur innerhalb der Grenzen, welche die Nutzer vorher setzen. Neu ist unter anderem, dass der Agent kein Native Token mehr…

Channel
Krypto World 🌏 Blockchain & Crypto
@kryptoworld_pc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
751subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001411603750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kryptoworld_pc |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kryptoworld_pc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 751 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 771 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 773 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 773 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.1%
- avg views ÷ 751 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 158
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.723%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 475 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📍 594 Bitcoin gestohlen: Coldcard erlebt beispiellosen Sicherheitsvorfall - was ist zu tun? In einem knapp 25-minütigen Fenster in den frühen Morgenstunden des 30. Julis wurden nach Analysen von Block und Chainalysis rund 594 Bitcoin aus etwa 500 Single-Signature-Wallets abgezogen. Der Angreifer verteilte die Beute über mehr als 1.300 Transaktionen und führte anschließend rund 562 Bitcoin auf einer einzigen Adresse …
👍2
📍 BitMEX: Krypto-Urgestein schließt seine Pforten – das müssen Kunden jetzt beachten Der Derivate-Pionier BitMEX stellt den Handel ein. Nach mehr als elf Jahren fährt die Börse ihr Geschäft bis zum 23. September 2026 herunter und fordert alle Nutzer auf, offene Positionen zu schließen und Guthaben abzuziehen. Wir ordnen ein, was hinter der Schließung von BitMEX steckt und welche Fristen jetzt zählen. BitMEX hat am …
❤1
📍 MiCA-Regulierung (EU vs. Tether) – Was bedeutet das für Europas Rolle in der Krypto-Welt? 👉 Die neue MiCa-Regulierung triftt ab dem 01. Juli 2026 in Kraft: 🚨 Die EU delistet Tether’s $175 Milliarden USDT von allen lizenzierten Exchanges. Binance, Coinbase, Kraken und Crypto;com haben USDT für EU-User bereits entfernt, weil Tether sich nicht um eine MiCA-Lizenz bemüht hat. Gleichzeitig ist Circle’s USDC voll comp…
❤🔥1👍1👏1😍1🆒1
📍 Ab heute, dem 1. Juli knallt die regulatorische Peitsche Die MiCA-Regulierung wird in der EU vollständig durchgesetzt. 🚨 Ab diesem Zeitpunkt greifen die Vorgaben der europäischen Aufsichtsbehörden. Krypto-Börsen ohne entsprechende Zulassung können ihre Dienste für Kunden aus der EU nicht mehr wie bisher anbieten und müssen den Zugang in vielen Fällen einschränken oder einstellen Wer künftig EU-Bürger bedienen möc…
👍1👏1💘1💯1🤩1
📍Warum Bitcoin unter 60.000 Dollar fiel und nun zäh um die Marke ringt Bitcoin hat im Juni 2026 die psychologisch wichtige Schwelle von 60.000 Dollar gerissen und kämpft sich zum Wochenstart wieder knapp darüber zurück. Auslöser war kein Krypto-Skandal, sondern ein hartnäckiger Inflationsschock in den USA, der die Hoffnung auf Zinssenkungen begraben hat. Die börsengehandelten Bitcoin-Fonds wirkten dabei wie ein Bran…
📍 Bitcoin: Wichtiger Support verteidigt! Ausblick auf die nächsten Wochen Der Bitcoin-Kurs konnte mit dem letzten Wochenschluss eine entscheidende charttechnische Unterstützung verteidigen. In der vergangenen Woche ist der Kurs bis auf die Marke von 59.100 Dollar gefallen und hat damit ein neues Jahrestief verzeichnet. Im Zuge dieser Korrektur hat er wichtige charttechnische Marken eingebüßt, darunter den 200-Wochen…
❤1
📍 Dezentralisiert, aber nicht unverwundbar: Bisq und Haveno unter Beschuss Innerhalb von drei Wochen wurden zwei der bekanntesten datenschutzorientierten Handelsplattformen für Bitcoin und Monero Opfer schwerwiegender Sicherheitsvorfälle. Die Angriffe auf Bisq sowie auf eine auf dem Haveno-Protokoll basierende Plattform zeigen, dass das Gefahrenpotenzial für dezentrale Marktplätze fundamental gestiegen ist. Am 1. M…
📍 Was hat HypeRocket mit Hyperliquid (HYPE) zu tun — und warum sollte es dich interessieren? Stell dir eine Plattform vor, die so leistungsstark ist, dass sie mehr Volumen verarbeitet als alle anderen dezentralen Börsen zusammen. Das ist Hyperliquid - die weltweit dominierende DEX (Dezentrale Exchange). 📊 Hyperliquid in Zahlen 💰 Über 74 Mrd. $ tägliches Handelsvolumen 👑 70 % des gesamten DEX-Perpetual-Marktes ⚡ 0…
🎉1💘1🤩1🆒1
📍 HYPE kommt an die Börse: 21Shares bringt den ersten Hyperliquid-ETF in die USA Frisches Geld aus der Tradfi-Welt für einen der aufregendsten DeFi-Protokolle der letzten Jahre: 21Shares hat am 12. Mai 2026 mit dem THYP und dem gehebelten TXXH die ersten US-amerikanischen ETFs aufgelegt, die den HYPE-Token von Hyperliquid abbilden. Für institutionelle Anleger, die bislang keinen regulierten Zugang zu HYPE hatten, ma…
❤1
📍 Bitcoin: Jetzt folgt der entscheidende Test in diesem Bärenmarkt Der Bitcoin-Kurs hat in den letzten sechs Wochen entscheidende Fortschritte gemacht, indem der Widerstandsbereich zwischen 73.000 und 76.000 Dollar überwunden, sowie die runde Marke von 80.000 Dollar und das Bullmarket-Supportband auf Wochensicht zurückerobert werden konnte. In der öffentlichen Diskussion auf den sozialen Netzwerken mehren sich bere…
📍 SUI springt 25 Prozent: Brandt sieht „Major Bottom“ – und SUIG liefert die Fundamentaldaten Kein anderer Altcoin dominiert heute die Schlagzeilen so wie SUI. Der Token der gleichnamigen Layer-1-Blockchain verzeichnet gestern Intraday ein Plus von rund 32 Prozent und stieg kurzfristig bis auf 1,41 US-Dollar – nach einem wochenlangen Siechtum nahe der 0,90-Dollar-Unterstützung. Zwei Katalysatoren treffen dabei zusam…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kryptoworld_pc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,248,533 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Krypto World 🌏 Blockchain & Crypto” (@kryptoworld_pc), 751 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kryptoworld_pc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.