Channel
@kruegerdegen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
626subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001406774426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kruegerdegen |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kruegerdegen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 626 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 626 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 81 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Marketing campaign begins very soon. 📷 The quiet building phase is nearly over. We’ve been putting in a huge amount of work behind the scenes to make sure we’re in the strongest position possible before we really ramp things up. Lens has always been about building long-term utility, and we’re only just getting started. 14k mc 7FinZs9DTvrqQ55iRcoqcwGyTJK14v65wPJsLNoepump t.me/LensProjectSOL
Signed @KruegerCalls
New callers are being onboarded this week along with alot more bullish news. 📷 Going to make $LENS a Solana project that everyone will remember. Worked on this for a while now and the foundation is well & truly set, it’s time to get moving properly. 7FinZs9DTvrqQ55iRcoqcwGyTJK14v65wPJsLNoepump t.me/LensProjectSOL
Signed @KruegerCalls
Calling the bottom here at 10k mc. 📷 Been building $LENS since day one, never stopped and i'm continuing to work regardless of any situation we're in. This past week I've been heads down - rebuilding infrastructure, slashing costs, fixing every broken piece of the bot and adding new features. This week there is going to be some serious progress made. Lens Bot is back online properly, tighter than ever. Smarter sig…
Signed @KruegerCalls
Dog In Hood did 10m on Robinhood recently… Let’s see how Blob In Hood can do. Still low cap at 15k and I think they getting some callers soon. Let’s see! 👀
🤩1
Signed @KruegerCalls
Blob In Hood | $BLOB My first gamble on Robinhood chain, little spin off of all the runners like Dog In Hood etc. Blobfish is a famous fish that went viral all over the internet not long ago, this is the first Blob In Hood on this chain so it's an OG. Hoping it can be a runner for us all, graphics are funny and has the potential to do well. Let's see 7.5k mcap 0xf114F407F4BF9759cCD9bf80F203a180982005B2 x.com/T…
Signed @KruegerCalls
Definitely a wild ride on this one so far but with the Bull meta going on currently, I genuinely do think the lore is solid and it stands a chance at sending back up. - Safemoon went to 17 billion back in the day - Hank (who’s endorsed $SFB was a developer on the core team of SafeMoon) - SafeMoon X follow his account still after 5 years - He holds 55% of SafeBull and has already agreed he won’t be touching it, as-we…
Signed @KruegerCalls
Aped dip here, had a massive dump but it was just holders following the red. Team still holding all their supply and Hank the SafeMoon Team member is fully onboard and discussing next moves including a X space sometime soon aswell. It's the first coin he's endorsed within this meta, and the only one he will be supporting like this. Think a nice reversal from here is very possible, $ANSEM dipped to same mcap as it is…
Signed @KruegerCalls
SafeBull combines the OG concept of "DeFi" with the new, tending to both sets of onboarding, whilst donating proceeds to the developer who made DeFi what it is today... This project is about giving the recognition Hankusun truly deserves with what he did with safemoon 100% Fee's and 55% supply will be donated to the wallet the 1/3 core team member of Safemoon gives, if he decides to onboard the project. He's never e…
Signed @KruegerCalls
This should be launching tonight and it’s sounding like it could be a big one. 👀 Team is looking to connect with a dev from one of the biggest DeFi coins in history and will be potentially getting them onboarded, they have sources that are close with the said individual so the chances of it happening are pretty high. If they’re successful, it’s gonna seriously pop off. Locked and loaded for this one… Stay posted 🚨…
❤1🔥1
Signed @KruegerCalls
Krueger's Degen Hub ⚔️ pinned «16x here!»
Searching for more plays 🔭 Got word that there could be a new one coming tonight, yesterday I posted a 16x so I’m looking to repeat that again but better… Keep notifications on, will always do my best to post plays at lowest cap possible 🔔 - @KruegerCallz 😈
❤1🔥1
Signed @KruegerCalls
16x here!
Signed @KruegerCalls
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kruegerdegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 829,957 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Krueger's Degen Hub ⚔️” (@kruegerdegen), 626 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kruegerdegen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.