Пою немножко 😚
custom 54494073077692011914custom 53705871116300540213

Channel
@krizziby
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
271subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002417265386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @krizziby |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/krizziby |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 271 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 272 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 271 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 271 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
110 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5370587111630054021 | 49 | 44.5% | |
| custom 5384268592512528580 | 23 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5449407307769201191 | 17 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5312022694223426906 | 15 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5372826267060019529 | 4 | 3.64% | |
| custom 5371075646980104456 | 2 | 1.82% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krizziby. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пою немножко 😚
custom 54494073077692011914custom 53705871116300540213
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53705871116300540219custom 53120226942234269064custom 53842685925125285803
Будем жестко купаться и кайфовать весь день и всю ночь🐆🐆 Буду участвовать в маркете Готовлю новенький ассортимент на это событие для вас 👹
custom 53705871116300540212custom 53120226942234269061
💎 18.07 - @INTERACTI7E 3 YEARS: POOL DAY PARTY LUXURY VILLAGE LOCKED CLUB / Краснодар 18 июля празднуем 3 года платформы, объединяя в одном месте - наших друзей и представителей проектов: КОМАНДА INTERACTI7E, ТВОРЦЫ ЮГА, ЮЖНЫЙ ЗВУК, ХИХА и других вайбовых людей искусства из разных уголков нашей страны, на базе отдыха c двумя танцполами, бассейном, лесом и прочими уголками и интерактивами в Октябрьском (Прикубанский…
custom 53705871116300540212custom 53120226942234269061custom 53842685925125285801
Наводили шуму с @Valeraaoo 🧍♂️🧍♂️ И это только первое видео из снятых
custom 53705871116300540213custom 53842685925125285803custom 53728262670600195291
Креативом можно захлебнуться 😊
custom 53705871116300540214custom 54494073077692011914
В преддверии арт-тусовки южного соуса продолжаем делать акцент на всяких рукодельных интересностях. Плюс вспомнили, что давно не собирали подборки. Так появился этот пост. Вашему вниманию — классные южные DIY-бренды. 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 1️⃣ энтомологическая лаборатория 2️⃣ krizziby 3️⃣ happy unicorn 4️⃣ vileinit 5️⃣ тропы 〰️〰️〰️〰️ #соус_подборка #краснодар
custom 53842685925125285804custom 53120226942234269063custom 53705871116300540213
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53842685925125285807custom 53705871116300540215custom 54494073077692011914
Этой ночью я была на супер трушной HARD тусовке НА ЗАВОДЕ в Краснодаре!!! я не верю в это ТРИ промо rawerly, formashuma, troubadour объединились что бы устроить нам это событие и это было нереально круто После рейва, я травмировала ногу, все тело болит, но всё равно как же хорошо…
custom 53705871116300540218custom 54494073077692011913custom 53120226942234269062
Объемные голубые трайблы на авторской шапке с рожками ручной работы, для взрывной @Valeraaoo ✨💜✨ Накидайте актива на reels и заглядывайте к Лере на страничку, она очень круто дает габбу 😅
custom 537058711163005402110custom 53842685925125285805custom 53120226942234269064custom 53728262670600195293custom 53710756469801044562custom 54494073077692011912
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @krizziby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,183,171 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@krizziby named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐤𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐳𝐢𝐛𝐲” (@krizziby), 271 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krizziby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.