Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REST | KRISTA LI Drawing | 16+

Channel

REST | KRISTA LI Drawing | 16+

@krista_li_XD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003191581854
TypeChannel
Username@krista_li_XD
DescriptionЭто канал посвящен моему художеству! Хз что ещё сказать. Чекайте инфо пост
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/krista_li_XD

Growth

2516 Aug 2026, 13:02 — 251 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:18 — 251 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:027 Aug 2026, 02:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 250–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:18251no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:02251first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.9%
avg views ÷ 251 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,926
Reactions total147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
152
Videos
5
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

317 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53665345909429758196921.8%
💘5216.4%
custom 53661934373956860364714.8%
custom 5363859805570108395299.15%
288.83%
❤‍🔥288.83%
🥰288.83%
custom 5366206743204369124226.94%
custom 536657308673484899292.84%
🍓41.26%
custom 540230121456824053810.315%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krista_li_XD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC80 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 536653459094297581920custom 53638598055701083956custom 53662067432043691244custom 53665730867348489922

1 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC131 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребята, вы немного ахуете после крупного завозика, так что готовьте сраке Я вообще очень давно обещала это нарисовать, но вы же знаете, какая я пиздаболка... Кхм 😠

custom 536653459094297581919

31 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC404 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ненавижу этих ублюдков 😓 #13карт #Скетч #Явахуи

custom 536653459094297581925custom 53662067432043691245

24 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC259 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Блин, порой забываю выкладывать хотя бы коммишки💔 Я полуживая бтв. В основном рублюсь в Майн, потому что сил жить нет ойбля🍽 Ладно хватит нытья, постараюсь как можно быстрее восстановиться и приготовить вам вкусняшек 👀 #коммишки #скетч

custom 536620674320436912413custom 53665345909429758195custom 53638598055701083954custom 53665730867348489922

19 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC278 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я рыдаю, за что вы у меня такие булочки 😭

custom 53638598055701083957

19 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC291 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Соррян за качество

custom 53665730867348489925

19 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC256 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

НАКОНЕЦ ТО 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 536385980557010839512

19 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC227 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @super_moth01Photo

с др кристочка !!!)))) 😎😎 хоррор квест был заебись больше никогда так не делай пожалуйста💜 шуткую ребят подеисыватесь на заю из рая вы бы видели что криста там ресует 😱😱 опять же желаю всего самого вкусного и щасливого 🥰🥰 !!! ловаю тебя бро!!!! #арт

❤‍🔥15🥰21

18 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC221 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну, как говорится.. Happy birthday to me (⁠。⁠ノ⁠ω⁠\⁠。⁠) #Фанарт (моя солнышка маленькая вкусненькая малышочка нарисовала мне прекраснейший арт боже храни ее господь люблю её 🛐. Кхм, извинитесь.)

💘26❤‍🔥52🥰2🍓1

7 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC257 views30 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @p_x_squadPhoto

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨🧦✨ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🐦Друзья, это продолжение коллаба, от которого веет летом, морем и жаркими деньками отдыха. Участники очень постарались над ним, а именно: 🤩Габриэль – Криста Ли 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Скажем спасибо художнику за участие в этом ивенте! Однако, это далеко не всё, что мы подготовили для вас, ожидайте следующих работ!🧡

🥰194❤‍🔥3💘3🍓1

30 Jun 2026, 13:00 UTC301 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

21❤‍🔥2

30 Jun 2026, 11:14 UTC334 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

WHO IS THIS??? Я рисую кстати. Не спеша черемша съела бомжа #Спойлер

💘23🥰5❤‍🔥3🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @krista_li_XD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 138,568 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REST | KRISTA LI Drawing | 16+” (@krista_li_XD), 251 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krista_li_XD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.