Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kriperr.biserr

Channel

Kriperr.biserr

@kriperPletet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

151subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002494609084
TypeChannel
Username@kriperPletet
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kriperPletet

Growth

150151150.57 August 2026 — 150 subscribers8 August 2026 — 150 subscribers14 August 2026 — 151 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150–151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:07151+1
8 Aug 2026, 19:46150no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:03150first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 151 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (30 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,012
Reactions total155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5319.7%
custom 53705476408806294223713.8%
custom 54539546387535843433412.6%
custom 52650504536782650843211.9%
custom 5310069093989126892228.18%
custom 5213262476757473475207.43%
custom 5215649039760001882197.06%
❤‍🔥186.69%
custom 5456141472891950029176.32%
💘176.32%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kriperPletet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC46 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤑😪🤟👈😎🥶 моя новая работка - кисуля плела на тест от Златы,была рада что она меня пригласила ⬜ сплела за 2 дня 😌 схема платная,всем советую приобрести её,чтобы сплести такую красоту и еще от себя я решила добавить серые лапки 🐾 жду оценочку и ваших реакций ❤️

❤‍🔥9custom 54561414728919500295custom 52132624767574734753custom 53705476408806294223custom 53100690939891268922custom 545395463875358434321💘1

2 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC84 views24 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

подвожу итоги месяца всего у меня получилось 👱‍♂️работы: ☂️на тест 🦢на сп итогом я довольна 🧸  @w_kirpich спасибо за звездочку @yule_ku спасибо за звёздочку 😊

custom 52156490397600018828custom 53705476408806294225custom 545395463875358434353custom 54561414728919500293

1 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC101 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 мой паприкот был парный с Настей коты получились у нас просто лапочки мне напомнил её кот британской породы 😘 так она еще и бант добавила,просто суперское сочетание получилось 👍 🥧🥧🥧🥧🥧🥧🥧🥧 эти крохи ждут ваших оценок!! 😓👌

custom 53705476408806294226custom 531006909398912689232custom 52650504536782650842

31 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC105 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

наконец-то пост, и это у меня.. 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😏 плела на совместный проект от паприки начала еще плести его в июне, а закончила только сегодня,мда уж.. долго конечно 🛑 но зато я довольна результатом 💯 решила котика сплести сереньким,и мне безумно нравится его окрас 👾 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 теперь это моя любимая фигурка 🩸 буду ждать ваших оценок ❤️ @w_kirpich пасиба за звёздочку!

custom 54561414728919500298custom 53705476408806294223custom 526505045367826508421custom 52132624767574734751custom 52156490397600018821custom 54539546387535843431

31 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC90 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

о май гад..🤍 паприкаа привеет спасибо большое за подписку, рада тебя тут видеть 🥹

9custom 54539546387535843434

31 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

всем привет, поздравляю вас всех с ДДС 🥰 желаю чтобы вам подарили желаемые хотелочки а вот мои хотелки 🍪

3custom 54561414728919500291

25 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC128 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

пупс🥰✨

custom 5265050453678265084113custom 52132624767574734753custom 53100690939891268921

21 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC188 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

моя новая работа - яблочный кот 🍎 плела на секретный тестик от Полиночки еще я долго думала какого цвета сплести котика,но остановилась на белой расцветке 🐈 очень долго мучилась над фотографией,но результат меня радует 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 много писать не буду,как вам котёнок?🍎

custom 5265050453678265084104custom 53100690939891268922💘1custom 54539546387535843431

20 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC176 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

завтра пост будет 🥰

custom 5370547640880629422127custom 53100690939891268923

12 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC215 views23 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍋🍋🍋🍋- моя новая работа,которую я сплела на тест ❣️автор цыпочки Соня,она меня сама пригласила в тест,очень приятно было 💕 так же я сплела цыпу за 3 дня,с долгими перерывами,начала плести еще в июне,а закончила сегодня ❤️ и еще я быстро выбрала цвет для накидки, и ей очень-очень подходит ➖➖➖➖🦋➖➖➖➖ как вам цыпа?👼 @raziyat28, спасибо за звезду 🍋

💘65custom 52132624767574734754❤‍🔥3custom 53100690939891268923custom 53705476408806294222

9 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC174 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

процессик ❤️

custom 52132624767574734759custom 54539546387535843439custom 53100690939891268923❤‍🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC190 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

давайте актива 😊

5❤‍🔥4💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kriperPletet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 647,359 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kriperr.biserr” (@kriperPletet), 151 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kriperPletet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.