Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

криль confession

@krilcf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

114subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003998002631
TypeChannel
Username@krilcf
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/krilcf

Growth

113114113.59 Aug 2026, 22:32 — 113 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:42 — 114 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 22:3210 Aug 2026, 08:42
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:42114+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:32113first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.4%
avg views ÷ 114 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.1
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (7 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,073
Reactions total165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

165 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54044729089469087213521.2%
custom 54067938405541879912817.0%
custom 54066980713734200792112.7%
custom 52808253660453013421911.5%
custom 51164399552618842961710.3%
custom 5404785956228211640169.70%
custom 5334874634657499304106.06%
custom 5352635793305246819106.06%
custom 511651080504239901563.64%
custom 511652550242048615031.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC31 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я заеблась это рисовать. Идея рисунка: фалдж🍉 Не анон p$1n@ 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 54066980713734200793custom 51164399552618842962custom 53526357933052468192custom 52808253660453013421custom 54047859562282116401

Signed p$1n@

9 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC48 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как и просили. Не анон p$1n@ 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤@anonkrilcfbot

custom 54044729089469087217custom 51165255024204861503custom 54067938405541879913custom 54066980713734200791

Signed p$1n@

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC62 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я такой ахуенный хедканон придумала ( пишу пока не забыла ,потом сьебываю на озеро ) короче ,если бы был реальный зомби апокалипсис, то илья бы обязательно где то накосячил, из-за чего зомби их нашли, а крис ,отдал илью в жертву зомби, сказав «как сказал один поэт "на твой мозг уже нету надежды"» 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 51165108050423990156custom 51164399552618842961custom 54047859562282116401custom 54067938405541879911

Signed m3v11n. #неебименя

9 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ахуенно неанон александровна 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 54066980713734200791

Signed m3v11n. #неебименя

9 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🤩:: дайте идей для рисунков по крилям🛐

custom 52808253660453013422

Signed p$1n@

8 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC66 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

автор: яна вирдоу 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 540447290894690872110custom 54067938405541879917custom 52808253660453013425custom 53348746346574993042custom 51164399552618842961custom 53526357933052468191custom 54047859562282116401custom 54066980713734200791

Signed m3v11n. #неебименя

8 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC67 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нужно Криса крупным планом в этом костюме? Неанон p$1n@ 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 51164399552618842962custom 52808253660453013421custom 54044729089469087211custom 54067938405541879911

Signed p$1n@

8 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC67 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Что я блять нарисовала..😐 Не анон p$1n@ 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 54044729089469087216custom 53348746346574993041custom 54067938405541879911

Signed p$1n@

8 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

у меня все 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 54066980713734200797

Signed p$1n@

8 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC66 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

что то на депрессивном.. неанон magmi0/магмио 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 54066980713734200796custom 54047859562282116404custom 51164399552618842963custom 54044729089469087213custom 52808253660453013421custom 53526357933052468191custom 54067938405541879911

Signed p$1n@

8 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC64 viewsread 9 August 2026

ребчт,кто был на последних двух стримах илюхи?? кто может покидать упоротых фото,с каким нибудь шакальным качеством

Signed m3v11n. #неебименя

8 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC68 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

хзхочукудатовыложитьэто неанон грейвдигер 📱🔤риль confession #тейк 🔤 @anonkrilcfbot

custom 52808253660453013427custom 54067938405541879914custom 54047859562282116403custom 53526357933052468191

Signed m3v11n. #неебименя

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @krilcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 477,145 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“криль confession” (@krilcf), 114 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krilcf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.