Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

꒰ ꒰ Iꪀִfִꭷׄ ꒱꒱ 𑂯 🎆 ՚՚

@krasotBio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002225403675
TypeChannel
Username@krasotBio
Created6 July 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/krasotBio

Growth

101110.512 Aug 2026, 11:17 — 10 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:14 — 11 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 11:1713 Aug 2026, 04:14
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:1411+1
12 Aug 2026, 11:1710first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

260 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🆒6525.0%
💋3111.9%
🕊3111.9%
🍓249.23%
💊218.08%
💘197.31%
🖕186.92%
124.62%
💔103.85%
👍83.08%
❤‍🔥72.69%
🤡51.92%
41.54%
👻41.54%
🐳10.385%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2024 to 19 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Dec 2025, 19:07 UTC508 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Back in the 90's I was in a very famous tv show

🕊6🍓43💘3🖕1

16 Nov 2025, 19:32 UTC669 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

И я убью себя, когда выпадет снег

❤‍🔥644🖕2🍓1

2 Nov 2025, 20:46 UTC674 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I wanna hear you say it Don't wanna need to rephrase

💋5💔4🍓3💘2

25 Oct 2025, 22:26 UTC654 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Остались буквы в документах на счетах.. И эти буквы были именем твоим!» Fadejprikol, Kotenkxwx, myyavkk, uuuyyyz15, britainswife

💘7🕊4👍1

11 Oct 2025, 19:52 UTC730 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

opinion about me Чищу тольк спам и оффтоп

🍓9💘3❤‍🔥1🆒1

11 Oct 2025, 19:51 UTC653 views114 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Незнакомец - 🆒 Знакомый - 👍 Друг/подружка - 💘 Фанат/love меня - 💊 Раньше общались - 💔 Хотите познакомиться - 🖕

🆒63💊19🖕15👍7💔6💘4

11 Oct 2025, 19:49 UTC687 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

hung up the chick habit hang it up, daddy!

💋6👻4🕊4

11 Oct 2025, 19:49 UTC662 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

/ ) u wanna ࣪be ׅ friends? 𝂅 ᅠᅠׄᅠᅠᅠᅠ ੭୧ ╰ hm.. ꒱ྀིა . ֹ ::было бы круто .. just read this ㅤׄ♡ 女王 ╱ dni fd ︵ ︵ .and then.. dm me! ⫰ ⌣ ⏝ ⏝

💋10🍓4🕊4💊21🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @krasotBio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,294,810 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“꒰ ꒰ Iꪀִfִꭷׄ ꒱꒱ 𑂯 🎆 ՚՚” (@krasotBio), 11 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krasotBio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.