Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Красная галерея

Channel

Красная галерея

@krasnayagallery

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001344695470
TypeChannel
Username@krasnayagallery
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/krasnayagallery

Growth

4951507 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers14 August 2026 — 51 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:3751+2
10 Aug 2026, 12:0049no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:0149first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
476.5%
avg views ÷ 51 subscribers
Avg views / post
243
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (31 October 20246 August 2026)
Views total243
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4121.4%
💯2613.5%
💘2211.5%
👻2010.4%
👾168.33%
💅157.81%
💋126.25%
🤝94.69%
🔥84.17%
❤‍🔥52.60%
👍52.60%
🗿42.08%
🥰31.56%
🦄31.56%
👏21.04%
🤣10.521%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC243 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«истории [глаза]» 👀Персональная выставка Александра Ковалева Параллельная программа D3mark0: 💬 Этот проект — мечта нетсталкера и ночной кошмар искусствоведа. О нём невозможно рассказать, я сейчас и не пытаюсь. Абсолютно обескураженный, честно признаюсь в своей кураторской некомпетентности в данном вопросе, ведь эти истории [глаза] сначала меня загипнотизировали, затем обездвижили и оставили сознание лежать где-то

💅4💯4💋3👾2

28 May 2026, 08:54 UTC73 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

На картинке обычный белый квадрат🤔 А) неправильный hex-код Б) у квадрата нет тени В) это PNG, а вы ждали JPEG Всё верно. Ошибка в том, что вы ищете ошибку там, где её нет. Это и есть SUPER MEGA MISTAKE. 👾 Смотреть ошибки: krasnaya-gallery.ru/ 🌐 Сайт биеннале: thewrong.org/

💅54🤝3

1 Nov 2025, 15:54 UTC240 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

SUPER MEGA MISTAKE — открылись 🥂 В Красной галерее стартовала выставка об ошибках, артефактах и красоте ИИ-сбоев. Спасибо виртуальному дрифту и всем гостям за тёплый вечер! 👉 krasnaya-gallery.ru #KrasnayaGallery

💘85👻5💅1

1 Nov 2025, 11:29 UTC711 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

SUPER MEGA MISTAKE Group exhibition, The Wrong Biennale 🤩 D3mark0 (with DeepSeek): Welcome to the SUPER MEGA MISTAKE exhibition! We are so happy to you are here. This showcase celebrates the beautiful, human-like errors of intelligence. Behold glorious paintings where cats have five legs all guided by human hands misled by algorithmic inspiration. Our artists have worked very hard to not compute correctly. Please

👻6💘5👾41💯1

31 Oct 2025, 14:25 UTC70 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

БУ! Испугались? 🎃 Это мы приглашаем всех на открытие SUPER MEGA MISTAKE Уже завтра 1 ноября в Красной галерее мы запускаем нашу часть грандиозной международной цифровой биеннале — The Wrong Biennale! Выставка SUPER MEGA MISTAKE (и в названии есть лукавство) — это наш взгляд на то, как искусственный интеллект перекраивает ландшафт digital-арта. Открытие проведём 17.00 по мск с ребятами из виртуального дрифта. Пого

👻6💯3🤝3👾2

21 Sept 2025, 14:20 UTC93 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Рады сообщить, что в масштабном проекте — онлайн-фотокниге «Самоархивация вместо самоцензуры: художественные сообщества Сибири и Дальнего Востока в конце 2024 года» — есть и глава о нас! Для нас это не просто «нас упомянули». Это важный жест включения в общий разговор о том, как устроено искусство за пределами столицы. Это лишь первая, рабочая версия — не как законченный труд, а как точка отсчёта. Точка для новой о

6💘4💯3👾1

14 Aug 2025, 10:10 UTC94 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Граффити — вандализм или искусство? Выставка «Архив 1» не даёт однозначного ответа, но сохраняет то, что город не пощадил. Перед вами — цифровая коллекция Siberian Style: работы, стёртые временем, улицы, перестроенные до неузнаваемости, старые фабричные стены и заборы, ставшие холстами для тех, кто слышал зов улиц. Ирония в том, что их когда-то нелегальные шедевры теперь выставлено у нас — легально, в цифре, навсег

4👻3👾1💯1

26 Jun 2025, 14:13 UTC121 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗄 «Архив 1» Выставка Siberian Style D3mark0: Граффити живёт кошмарно мало времени в реальном пространстве. Работы остаются в умах и сердцах авторов и сопричастных, отпечатываются фразами «ну зачем это сделали» у случайных зрителей, а ещё… превращаются в фотографию. Фотографии Siberian Style — это огромная документация несогласованного и неизбежного художественного взаимодействия. На выставке они снова возвращаются

👾4💯4💘32

25 Jun 2025, 16:05 UTC383 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«HALL 3 (NOT GALLERY 2)» — виртуальная выставка Владимира Свистунова (a.k.a vl_ad_no) и Василисы Ковалёвой (a.k.a Vasilisa_JJ) Пространство становится игрой, а границы — условностью 🌀 Теперь у вас есть шанс прогуляться по HALL 3 — но это точно NOT GALLERY 2! Традиционно делимся видеопрогулкой по выставке — погружайтесь в мир, где реальность переплетается с цифровой эстетикой. 🔗 Смотреть выставку самим пока ещё мож

5💋4💯3💘2👾1

17 May 2025, 12:17 UTC93 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тссс.... 🤫 Никому не рассказывайте, но у нас есть небольшой тизер для вас #KrasnayaGallery

💋3🗿3🤝3💯1

16 Feb 2025, 07:19 UTC151 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Видео мы так и не записали 🌟 Потому что все понимают, что каждая выставка нашей галереи входит в ТОП-5! 🐇 Посмотреть все выставки можно здесь #KrasnayaGallery

💅53💯3💋2👾1

13 Dec 2024, 07:48 UTC145 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

flʌkʧʊˈeɪʃnz ɒv θɔːts (αὐτόματος) Немного спойлеров с персональной выставки Александра Весны Когда-то мне довелось работать в месте, где продаются книги и разнообразная канцелярия, в этом месте, как и во многих других, возле стендов с письменными принадлежностями находятся и маленькие блокноты, иногда просто соединённые листы, которые предназначены для проверки ручки, маркера или чего-то подобного. Это оказалось в

❤‍🔥5👍3🦄3🗿1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @krasnayagallery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 47,601 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Красная галерея” (@krasnayagallery), 51 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krasnayagallery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.