Channel
@krakbgi_01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002204814717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @krakbgi_01 |
| Description | 𐙚 LECLERC LOUNGE ♡ Александра Леклер и другие фото • видео • моменты уютный уголок для фанатов F1 🏁 анон: https://t.me/Krakbgi1bot буст: https://t.me/boost/krakbgi_01 архив: https://t.me/archive_krakbgi1 приват:https://t.me/krakbgi_01/14740 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/krakbgi_01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 108 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 108 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (14 September 2026 – 17 September 2026) |
| Views total | 528 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
17 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5454035298239418604 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5453922718556657350 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5453937802481803623 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5454063533354422928 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| custom 4960915504391784532 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5246979928536157330 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5453972127860427619 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5454317593554881713 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5474649650906570457 | 1 | 5.88% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krakbgi_01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 September 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ассоциация от ASM🩷 —Вы как рандомная фотосессия Александры для участия:подписка,репост к себе в канал либо другу,точку в комм,актив на протяжении всего интерактива,не беру рж 0-??(до стопа)
ASSOCIATED with @med 🌟 🩹коллаж с вашей эстетикой (работа сверху) и цветом + вы как инструментал песни with my playlist. для участия : 0. 🩹подписка на канал. 0. 🩹рп в канал/другу + точка в комм и имя на англ. /?
Sticker, posted without a caption
шипы от чертовской. от вас: 1. подписка 2. рп(возьму и без кн) 3. точку в комментарии 4/?? до стопа + я
🖤ссоциаци от Rebecca Donaldson. Вы как - фильмы. 🎬 Для участия: — подписка на канал. — репост этого поста. — поставить «+» в комментариях. — и немного терпения. 🤩 4/?
custom 54746496509065704571
Sticker, posted without a caption
ЛОТЕРЕЯ НА НФТ FROM 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 DISP 🌟 УСЛОВИЯ : 🥹Подписка на диспач 🥹Репост данного поста 🥹Актив 🥹Все условия будут проверены
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔤est friends :: lilya boys🤵♂️:: @kkllhhm @vigqerllmarseille @f1_Still_I_Rise @archiveMichaelOlise girls👰♀️:: @eliskababickovaka12 @menruiii @styleofmleux @AlexandraLeclerc16 @lifestaylgrenku @AleMleux @Re66Don @lilymunihe9 @CarmenMonteroMund @carmen_medd @akimiantonellil @alexandramalenalecler У меня есть другие друзья, но у них нету каналов, я их тоже люблю 🤩 Простите если не все
custom 54539227185566573503custom 54539378024818036233custom 54540635333544229282custom 49609155043917845321custom 52469799285361573301custom 54540352982394186041custom 54543175935548817131
Associazioni di Andrea Kimi Antonelli 😜 Кто вы из сумерек? Condizioni: Быть подписаным на канал Репост этого поста в канал или другу Скрин/сс в комм 4/10
Давай завтра блин пусть будет
custom 54539721278604276191
ВЕЧЕР ПРИЗНАНИЙ/СПЛЕТЕН суть вечера в том,что вы обращаетесь к людям которые вам близки, которых вы любите, или хотите в чем то признаться. ЛИБО можете рассказать любую сплетню про кого либо. канал не несет ответственности за негатив!! счастливых вам голодных игр. писать : анон анон анон 🤩 @MichaelOlise
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @krakbgi_01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑳𝑰𝑳𝒀𝑨” (@krakbgi_01), 108 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krakbgi_01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.