Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇺🇦𝙺-𝚙𝚘𝚙 𝚄𝚗𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍✨

Channel

🇺🇦𝙺-𝚙𝚘𝚙 𝚄𝚗𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍✨

@kpop_unfiltered_ua

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002787465352
TypeChannel
Username@kpop_unfiltered_ua
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kpop_unfiltered_ua

Growth

15515915713 August 2026 — 155 subscribers13 August 2026 — 155 subscribers14 August 2026 — 156 subscribers20 August 2026 — 157 subscribers4 September 2026 — 159 subscribers13 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154–160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 16:20159+2
20 Aug 2026, 17:13157+1
14 Aug 2026, 01:18156+1
13 Aug 2026, 04:46155no change
13 Aug 2026, 04:33155first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4544.1%
😁1413.7%
💯1110.8%
💘87.84%
👏76.86%
🥴76.86%
🍓65.88%
😐21.96%
🤨21.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC48 viewsread 13 August 2026

🌸: Я давно хотіла створити невеликий тгк з новинами про мало відомі/нугу гурти, бо як людина яка любить за ними спостерігати помітила що часто дуже важко знайти інформацію про них. Тож вирішила спитати тут: які гурти можна додати до такого тгк? Не обов'язково прям нугу, можна ті по яким дуже мало контенту в укр фд

12 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: https://t.me/kpop_unfiltered_ua/4628 повністю з вами згодна, це піздєц. вже за час існування групи 3000 разів можна було дізнатись як вони працюють але замість цього люди тільки хуйню і пишуть

💘2

12 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC57 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: https://t.me/kpop_unfiltered_ua/4627 а ні до чого, коли срач продовжується настільки довго, згодом навіть претензія на нормальні аргументи пропадає і починається кидання гівна на вентилятор заради гівна на вентиляторі

💘3😁2

12 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: https://t.me/kpop_unfiltered_ua/4626 а плейв тут до чого😭 вони не ші

😁1

12 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC51 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: Фанати Plave зараз такі😕

😁5

12 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: Писати тейк тут також шкодить екології, як і те, що ви взагалі користуєтесь будь яким застосунком Ви вбивці планети, btw

👏3💘2

12 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC51 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: подивившись на всі ці безглузді полотна, які тут пишуть стає лячно, що у вас немає іншого хобі окрім сратись і видумувати нову проблему на ходу. екологію псували і будуть псувати, але природа має час на пристосування до якихось чинників, на відміну від людей, у яких термін життя дай бог до 70 років дотягне. ші це погано, абсолютно, я з цим не сперечаюсь. він використовує дуже багато ресурсів для охолодження своїх

6🍓2💘1🥴1

12 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: https://t.me/kpop_unfiltered_ua/4618 Думка про те, що люди підтримують артиста в чомусь, що відповідає їх переконанням вам не надходила? Чи для вас, якщо хтось не слідує за стадом, щоб когось хейтити і має свої аргументи у підтримку, це щось неймовірне?

2

12 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: Так коли ми відміняємо перерахованих вище артистів за ші? Чи то другоє?😊

😁41

12 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC48 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: Це все нагадує, як коли техьона відміняли за картоплю фрі, бо це проти палестини, фанати артистів, які промоутили колу, адідас, старбакс, пума ітд Ситуація та сама Типу, поскавчали і побігли підтримувати свою фавку, яка робить те саме, сміюсь

💯7

12 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC52 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: а все почалось з того, що укр тг канали по кпоп не запостили новину про бтс, нагадую, хто втратив сюжет цієї суперечки

5😁2

12 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌚: Бути фанатом кпоп та писати щось про екологію...🙊

🍓4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kpop_unfiltered_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇺🇦𝙺-𝚙𝚘𝚙 𝚄𝚗𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍✨” (@kpop_unfiltered_ua), 159 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kpop_unfiltered_ua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.