今日扑咪嘅時間將會如期係14:30 尖沙咀鐘樓🙇🏻♂️

Channel
九龍大遊行資訊發佈台
@kowloonprocession
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001214693639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kowloonprocession |
| Created | 22 May 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kowloonprocession |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 79 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 79 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 22 May 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 5
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
【採訪通知:6.7九龍大遊行主辦單位之一的學生動源(不反對通知書申請人)以及香港思流回應警方發出的反對通知書】 香港思流以及學生動源聯同多個學生組織,計劃於6月7日舉行遊行,並於5月29日和警方進行了一次協調會議。當中,警方不斷針對遊行申請人所屬組織的綱領,更稱「因學生動源支持勇武抗爭,所以相當有理由懷疑是次遊行會演變成嚴重暴力行為,破壞社會安寧」 警方於6月3日以書面發出反對通知書,反對的理由概括有四點,當中更包括警方指遊行路線會嚴重阻礙相關地點的交通。學生動源召集人鍾翰林,發言人何諾恆(遊行申請人)以及香港思流發言人陳宏宥,黃筠喬 將於明天見記者,交待有關反對通知書的詳情,我們的回應以及待續行動的安排。詳情如下: 日期:2020年6月7日(星期日) 時間:下午2:30 地點:尖沙咀鐘樓外 聯絡:6994 1468 (香港思流發言人 曾朗軒)/ telegram @guesswhoiamhk
[香港思流就警方對於6.7重燃之路遊行發出反對通知書的回應] 我們為香港思流,「重燃之路」6.7九龍大遊行的主辦單位之一,是次遊行由學生動源成員何諾恆及召集人鍾翰林作為遊行申請人及代表人,有關遊行申請已於今天下午獲發反對通知書。 反對通知書的文件內容共有八頁,而當中反對是次遊行的理由概括而言有四個,包括: 1.599(G)限聚令仍然生效,新型冠狀病毒的傳染性高 2.申請人與學生組織「學生動源」有關,而該組織是支持勇武抗爭 3.於2019月起,本港多次遊行都演變成衝突,導致多人受傷 4.遊行路線會嚴重阻礙相關地點的交通 我們義正詞嚴就警方反對是次遊行的理由表達強烈不滿,警方發出反對通知書的理由實屬無稽。 是次遊行由十多個學生組織合辦,由「學生動源」負責入紙申請,但警方單純因「學生動源」的理念而作反對的理據之一,根本是道聽塗說,亦是漠視了其他組織。我們早在「不反協調會議」中面對警方一式一樣的質疑,我們當場已直指:假如主辦方是…
部分华人在白宫前大声播放《义勇军进行曲》,举中国红旗
【6.7重燃之路九龍區大遊行已發出反對通知書】 是次遊行由學生動源成員何諾恆及召集人鍾翰林作為遊行申請人及代表人,有關遊行申請已於本日下午三點獲發反對通知書。 警方表示基於限聚延長、類似議題遊行從去年六月起曾多次爆發「嚴重暴力衝突」,並指申請人與學生動源有連繫,文件指出「學生動源主張勇武抗爭,而過去相同議題遊行「最終都會作出嚴重暴力違法行為破壞社會安寧」。 學生動源對警方發出反對通知書理由表示強烈不滿,有關理由實為無理指控學生動源計劃煽動他人於合法遊行作出違反行為。 警方更以去年六月起多場類似議題的「嚴重暴力衝突」作為反對理由之一,學生動源在此質疑警方是否日後一切有關遊行均不會獲發不反對通知書,而根據香港基本法,香港居民集會、遊行、示威的自由,我等認為警方並無權禁止任何有關活動。 而有關文件全文合共八頁,而其中四頁僅為警告根據公安條例未有獲發不反對通知書的遊行即屬非法集結,並詳細列出自2019年6月9日起多場未經批准的…
眾學生組織將於6月7號舉行重燃抗爭之火遊行。現我們誠意招募各位同路人作義務糾察,我們希望招募二千位糾察,主要工作是協助現場秩序,管理人流和提供幫助予參與人士,如各位有意欲參加,請填妥google表單https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScCZl6cNdokIZM4mD_zGrk6n5VVJ_8VZ0mS8B4-TgWG-mgAkQ/viewform?usp=sf_link ,十分感謝各位同路人的支持。
[重燃之路 喚醒希望] 因武漢肺炎在港肆虐,抗爭行動彷彿停滯不前,港共打壓越趨強硬,各種不擇手段令手足們寸步難行,我們彷似漸漸失去了行動力。 為此,我們一眾學生組織希望能身先士卒,在反送中一百萬人大遊行一周年前舉辦大型遊行,重燃革命之火,控訴社會的不公,以聲音,以良知,以行動,呼醒身邊的人,吹響黎明的號角。 重燃之路-九龍大遊行 日期:7/6 時間:14:00集合 15:00起步 路線:尖沙咀鐘樓出發,沿彌敦道遊行至旺角晏架街足球場外 黎明前的黑暗是最黑暗的,我們盼望能以是次遊行燃點起在黑暗中的一絲曙光,重燃革命之火,在抗爭路上重拾一絲希望,推進夕陽的升起。 主辦組織(ig): 香港思流 @ideologisthk 學生動源 @studentlocalism 學民為城學生聯盟 @st_alliance.hk 香港獨立學社 @hk_independent_institute 學教民陣線聯盟 @teach_student_…
Channel name was changed to «九龍大遊行資訊發佈台»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kowloonprocession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 13
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 13
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kowloonprocession named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“九龍大遊行資訊發佈台” (@kowloonprocession), 79 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kowloonprocession.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.