Channel
@kottur_va
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003849637856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kottur_va |
| Description | Здравстуйте! Меня зовут Григорий, я актер озвучания и вокалист. В этом канале вы можете ознакомиться с моим творчеством. По вопросам сотрудничества @thekottur |
| Created | 5 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kottur_va |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 66 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 66 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
335 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 171 | 51.0% | |
| 🔥 | 80 | 23.9% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 8.96% | |
| ☃ | 27 | 8.06% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 5.37% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 1.49% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.896% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.299% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kottur_va. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Момент поспокойнее и позабавнее. К слову, чудесная демонстрация, почему фанатского дубляжа все же нет: таких маленьких диалогов и фразочек в игре уйма. У того же Рюдзи, по ощущениям, количество реплик переваливает за десяток тысяч. Может, в аниме-адаптации ситуация иная, но узнаю я об этом не скоро. Спасибо Эрике за озвучку Макото. #озвучка
❤9🔥5🥰5
Не так давно начал проходить Persona 5 — игру в жанре, который я никогда не пробовал и не понимал. Несмотря на мой скептицизм, втянулся я быстро: японский шарм и интересные механики меня завлекли. С удивлением узнал, что у игры, оказывается, нет фанатских русских озвучек (по крайней мере, я не нашел), хотя русификаторы текста имеются. То, что я бы классно звучал на Рюдзи, я подумал минут через пять после его появлен…
❤5🥰3🔥2
Вокс в свое время был для меня, в определенной степени, прорывной ролью: так получилось, что весной 2024-го года кавер с моим участием стал очень популярным. Однако в то время я попросту не мог концентрироваться на озвучке. Увидев анонс продолжения, я был уверен, что к этой роли я ни за что не вернусь. Но, когда посмотрел сезон, преисполнился вдохновением и таки вернулся к Воксу в дубляже. В конце концов, не каждый …
🔥9❤8🥰3☃1👎1
Ну ладно, и еще немного ДжоДжо 🤩 Я очень редко озвучиваю что-то просто для себя, просто потому что захотел. Этот дубляж, надеюсь, станет началом исправления этого момента. Первая роль на моей памяти, во время записи которой я заплакал по-настоящему вместе с персонажем. Спасибо Максиму за озвучку Джайро. #озвучка
👍8🔥4❤2
В ТГК режиссера дубляжа Steel Ball Run'а не так давно вышел "бэкстейдж" записи. Можно посмотреть, как выглядит работа со стороны, послушать наши мысли о персонажах да и просто похихикать. Вот несколько фрагментов со мной 💀
❤15🔥5👍4🥰1
Ла-Ла Ленд в свое время сильно ударил по моему недоверию к мюзиклам. Фильм, а особенно песни, запомнились надолго. Идея этого кавера появилась достаточно давно, и я рад, что наконец могу его выпустить. Во время работы над ним я потренировался не только над не обычным для меня стилем исполнения, но и над сведением. Спасибо Ульяне за чудесную женскую партию и Владиславу за помощь в сведении. #вокал
❤13🔥5🎉4
Там же звучу за комичного дедулю #озвучка
❤10🔥5☃2🤯2
Поучаствовал в дубляже Аватара в роли Сокки. Приятно иногда поработать над такими супер мультяшными персонажами 🤩 #озвучка
❤9🔥8☃5
Мне давно хотелось поработать над визуальной новеллой. Можете заценить, как мое желание стало явью в демо-версии "Увидеть небо"! Я уже сам прошел демку, было очень интересно 💀 #озвучка
❤10👍3🔥3☃1
И, пусть у меня была и небольшая роль, стоит отметить, какое огромное впечатление на меня произвела игра. Огромное настолько, что я посвятил игре целый обзор и сделал кавер по одной из песен из нее.
❤10🔥3☃2👍1
С радостью могу сказать, что Studii Net наконец выпустили дубляж первого эпизода нашумевшей игры Dispatch. Я принимал участие в проекте как актер, поэтому могу только примерно представлять, через какие трудности пришлось пройти команде, учитывая структуру игры. #озвучка
❤7☃2
Актуальное портфолио по вокалу Также доступно по ссылке #вокал
🔥9❤5👍3☃1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kottur_va. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 615,229 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Григорий Витрик - ГВЗК” (@kottur_va), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kottur_va.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.