Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жмека Коков

Channel

Жмека Коков

@kotovkotov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,883subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001107702391
TypeChannel
Username@kotovkotov
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kotovkotov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8831,8941,888.57 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,887 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,890 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,892 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,891 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,886 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,883 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 41 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,881–1,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:191,883-3
13 Sept 2026, 03:201,886-5
9 Sept 2026, 05:151,891-1
3 Sept 2026, 10:441,892-2
28 Aug 2026, 01:041,894+5
24 Aug 2026, 14:441,889-1
10 Aug 2026, 21:221,890+3
7 Aug 2026, 12:121,887-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:161,888first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

655 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27441.8%
👍11217.1%
🔥8913.6%
😁7411.3%
💯203.05%
🗿192.90%
👌182.75%
🌚121.83%
🤔111.68%
🤡71.07%
🤯60.916%
🥰60.916%
😱40.611%
🫡30.458%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kotovkotov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC461 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ура, скоро новое видео!

🔥183👍1😱1

3 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC751 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Скупают книжки, закидывают в ИИ и утилизируют По мотивам недавнего поста Алексея Дизраптора можно разгонять, что если через Х лет произойдет какой-нибудь кризис микроэлеткроники и компы с телефонами станут снова дорогими, как это было 20-30 лет назад, то книги снова рискуют стать дешевымы и массовыми Сначала привыкли к Pocket Book'ам, теперь к клоду, а завтра подписка уже Х10 😁 Бумажные книги снова хорошо продаютс

6

2 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC854 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Карьера в 2026: консалтинг или бигтех? Недавно был вопрос в чате: Женя привет, на днях в cfa community была большая дискуссия про снижение(едва ли не утрату) ценности опыта в четверке, отсутствия прежней наработки навыков в условиях дефицита проектов и в целом что строчка из четвёрки уже не так котируется, мол умный студент пойдёт в индустрию сразу По большим пабликам в тг так же попадались на глаза нативные реклам

👍1914🔥3💯2🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC730 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🗿18🌚11😁51

31 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC817 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Моя худшая сделка Самая тупая и лоховская сделка была, когда об меня выходил крупный акционер одной девелоперской компании, где я работал. Олды думаю поняли про что речь Тогда у конторы вышел отчёт за 1п2024 и все вроде было ок, даже с учетом отмены льготных ипотек и тогда ещё не такой высокой КС долг выглядел приемлемо, с тем учётом что деньги проектного финансирования его покрывали. Пришел новый СЕО и регулярно з

9😁9😱3

30 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC914 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самая лучшая сделка на фондовом рынке Лет 5-6 назад я работал в Студии Лебедева и к нам с лекцией приходил Алексей Марков, автор книг про экономику, например самая известная его книга "Хулиномика". Тема была посвящена формированию личного капитала и ключевой тейк Алексея заключался в необходимости риска в период жизни, когда тебе 20-30 лет, условно 90% портфеля держать в акциях. Конечно, тогда еще и не пахло 2022 г.

🔥27😁12👍81

29 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC911 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Жизненные вопросы требуют проработки Чем хорош стратегический подход, так это в возможности рассматривать альтернативы и применении разных сценариев. Жизнь этим и хороша, что ты в любой момент времени пытаешься для себя / организации найти лучшее решение за оптимальную стоимость. Как название одноименной книги Дони Фредовича "The Art of the Deal" Если плохо прорабатывать жизнь, то она с большей вероятностью будет п

21👍3🔥3💯2

28 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC867 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Эпоха ИИ и сложность контента А у меня одного ощущение, будто люди стали меньше думать и просить рассказывать «проще»? Будто паттерн взаимодействия с нейронками перекладывается и на обычное общение и проще сказать «я ничего не понял, переделывай», нежели попытаться понять Проблема ИИ не столько в отсутствии у части людей будущей работы, сколько в снижении уровня коммуникации между собой. Условно говоря, через пару

22💯10👍5

25 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,100 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дмитрий Думик - долларовый миллионер с суицидальными мыслями Подкаст с Дмитрием вышел еще в 2024 году, но посмотрел я его только недавно. Интервью с Мариной Могилко про выгорание после продажи компании в Долине, отказа от "Американской мечты" и о том насколько несчастна жизнь с парой лямов $, но опустим Краткая справка: Дмитрий Думик сделал компанию "Мята", продал ее и затем сделал новую компанию, где дал пользоват

27👍5

24 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,470 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

О нет, рынок мертв, все сжалось, ничего нет!!! Как здорово, что у нас есть табличка консалтинговых компаний с реальными объемами выручки, взятые с ИНН каждой компании Мы знаем и понимаем реальную динамику в цифрах, God bless problem solving skills 🙏

25🔥8😁6🥰5🫡3

19 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,440 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Крейзи теория о падении индекса Мосбиржи Индекс Мосбиржи с мая-июня активно падает и многие авторы строили гипотезы о причинах драматического "бритья хомяков", хотя глобально все плохое, что могло произойти будто уже случилось в прошлые периоды. Можно было бы конечно списать падение на удары по НПЗ, новые санкции и общую панику, если бы комьюнити не взбудоражил пост от J.P Morgan о продаже акций Сбера с дисконтом в

8🤯6🔥2

18 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,160 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Стратегия Л. Фридмана Признаюсь честно, нахожусь в затяжном чтении знаменитой в узких кругах книги Лоуренса Фридмана "Стратегия". Первые 100 страниц залетели на ура, но все что после - идет с трудом. Последняя прочитанная часть была про связь теории игр и наличия ядерного вооружения в 20-м веке у СССР и США, привожу цитату: В действительности ни Кенеди, ни Хрущев не были готовы рассматривать подобный вариант и нашл

👍81🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kotovkotov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Changellenge >> х ВТБ
@changellenge · 45,079
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Changellenge >>: стажировки и вакансии
@offervacancy · 38,199
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Business Incognita
@businessincognita · 23,348
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
Экспертосфера
@expertosphere · 29,871
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жмека Коков” (@kotovkotov), 1,883 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kotovkotov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.