да.
Signed 「𝚂𝚞𝚗𝚎.」、 𝑬𝑵𝑻𝑱。#люкотича. #🇫🇮 #🇱🇺 #🇮🇸 #🇪🇪 #🇨🇭#🇳🇴 #🇦🇹

Channel
@kotichlogovo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001846182586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kotichlogovo |
| Description | --начало: 27.03.24 --конец: 16.12.24 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kotichlogovo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 35 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 35 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 15 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 26 | 40.0% | |
| 😨 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 9.23% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| custom 5289867633707994802 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.54% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2024 to 18 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
да.
Signed 「𝚂𝚞𝚗𝚎.」、 𝑬𝑵𝑻𝑱。#люкотича. #🇫🇮 #🇱🇺 #🇮🇸 #🇪🇪 #🇨🇭#🇳🇴 #🇦🇹
ты тут всех держишь?
Signed 「×—𝙺𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚑—×」 #Сунэлюбимка #𝚘𝚔𝚍𝚊
я.
Signed 「𝚂𝚞𝚗𝚎.」、 𝑬𝑵𝑻𝑱。 #люблюкотича #алексей. #🇫🇮 #🇱🇺 #🇮🇸 #🇪🇪 #🇨🇭#X:IN
хах, ну нихуя тут актив. даже лучше, чем на новом. что вас тут держит?
Signed 「×—𝙺𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚑—×」 #Сунэлюбимка #𝚘𝚔𝚍𝚊
ровно сто человек на канале. легенды ещё тут?
Signed 「×—𝙺𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚑—×」 #Сунэлюбимка
админы, ау. извините, но вы слепые? этот канал закрыт. уже несколько раз выставляли посты, поэтому я сейчас всех убираю с админов
😨9😱1
Signed 「×—𝙺𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚑—×」 #Сунэлюбимка
вы цените уход человека? я в шоке
🔥5🕊3
Signed 「×—𝙺𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚑—×」 #Сунэлюбимка
Котич(((😭
😭8👌1
Signed Ꮋ𖤓чн𖦹ᴧᴀп
@kotich_officia новый канал. если заходите, то активьте. скоро сделаю там оформление
Signed 「×—𝙺𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚑—×」 #Сунэлюбимка
Очень грустно.. (
👍1
Signed 🤍𑀝ᥙⲏ૦чӄᥲ~🌻
эх.
Signed ❄— Сунэ Зиманалка. #Котичлюбимый #Юлялучшая
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 --я ухожу с этого канала и больше не вернусь. я хочу начать все с чистого листа и создам новый канал --причины: 1.когда я создавал канал, то я пошёл неправильным путем, делая много вз подписок 2.этот канал нашли одноклассники 3.нет актива от пдп 4.отписки --по идеи в этом всем виноват. также подруга мне предлагала сделать чистку подписчиков, но тогда их просто станет ноль, поэтому мне проще соз…
😭18🎉4😱3🥰2🤩1😨1
Signed 「×—𝙺𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚑—×」 #Сунэлюбимка
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kotichlogovo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kotichlogovo named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“в сугробе с Котичем❄️” (@kotichlogovo), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kotichlogovo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.