2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 443–445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 03:35
444
no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:46
444
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
35s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
62.1%
🔥
20
17.2%
👍
10
8.62%
🥰
6
5.17%
😢
3
2.59%
😁
2
1.72%
🤩
2
1.72%
👏
1
0.862%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С Днем защиты детей!
Для меня этот день еще и про право каждого малыша на любовь, заботу и возможность быть услышанным.
Именно поэтому я помогаю мамам наладить грудное вскармливание, справиться с трудностями и завершить ГВ мягко и бережно, когда приходит время.
Пусть этот путь будет для вас спокойнее и радостнее 🤍!
Поделитесь моей страничкой с тем, кому нужно!
Мой сайт ➡️ тут
Дорогие! С Праздником Победы! Каждый год в этот день я пишу о своих бабушке, прабабушке и прадедушке!!!
⠀
❇️На первом фото мои прабабушка и прадедушка - Николай Алексеевич Поляков и Марфа Кузьминична Полякова.
⠀
Именно так 2 портрета в рамках стояли у бабушки в комнате.
⠀
Прадед не вернулся с войны, ему было 39. Прабабушка осталась одна с детьми - 17 и 6 лет.
Прабабушка умерла достаточно рано (1954 г.) и мне не дове…
Друзья!
Чтобы мы с вами были на связи , вот моя страничка в vk! Подписывайтесь!
В ближайшее время там появится много постов:
VK сообщество «Кормлю легко»
Почему есть такой способ докорма?👇
Способ не знакомый для многих - система докорма у груди. Помогает докормить малыша без использования бутылок.
Почему это важно?
Это важно при смешанном вскармливании, чтобы малыш любил грудь и не сбивал своё правильное сосание любыми другими предметами - соска, пустышка и т.д.
Минусы докорма из бутылки:
❌Легко возникает отказ от груди. Малыш привык к другим ощущениям при сосан…
Кормление грудью после года может вызывать вопросы со стороны родственников врачей и всех кто не знал, что и так тоже можно🤗
⠀
Первый совет, который слышит женщина когда она кормит грудью и при этом беременна: «Отлучай - И лучше быстро». Давайте разбираться на сколько это действительно необходимо?
⠀
1️⃣По опыту многих мам я знаю что совмещать гв и беременность это вполне реально.
⠀
2️⃣Если вы видите что ребёнок ещё о…
Соска и гв совместимы? Или мешают друг другу?
Конечно, ко мне на консультации приходят те мамы, которые попали в непростую ситуацию, и где соска сильно испортила гв. Но для некоторых детей гв и соска вполне совместимы.
Ваши мнения?
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Мой 2016-й - смотрите в карусели!
Это был отличный год - блог (в теперь запрещенной соц.сети) активно рос, я проводила семинары и встречи с мамами, ездила на конференцию в Питер.
❤14🔥7👍6
Signed Irina Wompro
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kormlulegko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 1 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 799,384 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кормлю_легко❤️” (@kormlulegko), 444 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kormlulegko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.