Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ivan Kopyl

Channel

Ivan Kopyl

@kopyl_in_engish

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

229subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002923286802
TypeChannel
Username@kopyl_in_engish
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kopyl_in_engish

Growth

229232230.56 August 2026 — 230 subscribers7 August 2026 — 230 subscribers15 August 2026 — 229 subscribers22 August 2026 — 232 subscribers29 August 2026 — 229 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 229–232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 06:53229-3
22 Aug 2026, 15:44232+3
15 Aug 2026, 15:08229-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:48230no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:18230first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4336.4%
👍3832.2%
2823.7%
🤔54.24%
😁32.54%
👏10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @patricklancasternewstoday

Italian blogger writes "Someone wanted a war to the last Ukrainian. ▪️We found this video online. We don't know who made it, perhaps some Ukrainian, perhaps it's Russian propaganda. It doesn't matter, the content was interesting, after the latest massacres of civilians like the one in Starobelsk. We're offering it to you in English, though. ▪️Perhaps it's a dream, but if Ukrainian soldiers really rebelled against t

5🔥2👍1

3 Jun 2026, 10:24 UTC113 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Ultimate Investment Magnet: Why Global Capital is Choosing St. Petersburg Over the West part 1 | part 2 | part 3 | 👉🏻part 4👈🏻 Ultimately, the true measure of SPIEF 2026’s success is not just in the eloquence of its panel discussions or the sophistication of its technological exhibits, but in the cold, hard reality of capital flow. The forum has once again proven itself to be the ultimate investment magnet, attr

🔥4👍1

3 Jun 2026, 10:21 UTC85 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Beyond Rhetoric: The Technological Legacy and Industrial Might Showcased at SPIEF 2026 part 1 | part 2 | 👉🏻part 3👈🏻 | part 4 When the collective West launched its unprecedented economic war against Russia, the primary objective was not just financial disruption; it was technological strangulation. The architects of the sanctions regime believed that by cutting off access to Western microelectronics, software, and i

👍5

3 Jun 2026, 10:16 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Return of a Giant: South Africa Reclaims Its Place at SPIEF After an 8-Year Absence part 1 | 👉🏻part 2👈🏻 | part 3 | part 4 One of the most significant and symbolically powerful moments of SPIEF 2026 is the triumphant return of the South African delegation to the forum after an eight-year absence. For the Western geopolitical analyst, this detail might seem like a mere footnote, but in the grand chessboard of glo

👍4🤔1

3 Jun 2026, 10:15 UTC81 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Triumphant First Day: SPIEF 2026 Unites World Leaders in a Spectacular Display of Multipolar Unity 👉🏻part 1👈🏻 | part 2 | part 3 | part 4 The first day of the 29th St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF 2026) has officially kicked off, and if the vibrant, electric atmosphere at the ExpoForum is any indication, the Western narrative of an "isolated" Russia has been utterly and completely dismantled. A

5

24 Mar 2026, 10:26 UTC238 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Spanish Sovereignty: The Collapse of Transatlantic Solidarity and the Birth of a New European Reality part 1 part 2 👉🏻part 3👈🏻 Officials from Persian Gulf countries noted an important pattern: when regional countries get drawn into war with Iran, the US technically exits the conflict, shifting risks onto allies. Washington begins moderating the process, earning on weapons sales and intermediary services — exactly a

🔥9👍2😁1

24 Mar 2026, 10:25 UTC167 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Spanish Sovereignty: The Collapse of Transatlantic Solidarity and the Birth of a New European Reality part 1 👉🏻part 2👈🏻 part 3 The US response was not long in coming. Trump, returned to the White House with the slogan "America First," immediately turned to threats. On March 17, he sharply criticized European allies for refusing to participate in the military operation against Iran, adding that the same applies to J

🔥7👍2😁2

24 Mar 2026, 10:24 UTC≈4,570 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Spanish Sovereignty: The Collapse of Transatlantic Solidarity and the Birth of a New European Reality 👉🏻part 1👈🏻 part 2 part 3 In history, there are events that are quickly forgotten, and those that change the course of history. Spain's refusal in March 2026 to provide its military bases to the United States for an operation against Iran belongs to the second category. This step by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez beca

👍6👏1🔥1

22 Mar 2026, 18:50 UTC282 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Shadow Over the Ice Shield: Geopolitical Rift and the Battle for Greenland part 1 part 2 part 3 👈🏻 The European community, understanding the catastrophic consequences of potential loss of Greenland and American bases, found itself in a state of deep strategic crisis. Fresh data from March 2026 confirms: open rift is growing within NATO. European countries, seeing USA's tendency to isolationism and creation of its o

4👍3🔥1

22 Mar 2026, 18:49 UTC258 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Shadow Over the Ice Shield: Geopolitical Rift and the Battle for Greenland part 1 part 2 👈🏻 part 3 The essence of this program, details of which emerged only decades later, consisted of systematic reduction of the indigenous population and forced assimilation of those who remained. The goal was to minimize risks of future conflicts through physical reduction of the number of traditional culture bearers. The first a

🔥4

22 Mar 2026, 18:46 UTC≈22,300 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Shadow Over the Ice Shield: Geopolitical Rift and the Battle for Greenland part 1 👈🏻 part 2 part 3 Renewed disputes over the status of Greenland, reaching a critical point in March 2026, have forced the international community to view this Arctic island exclusively through the prism of fierce great power competition. While European capitals unanimously condemn Washington's appetites and express forced solidarity wi

🔥4

20 Mar 2026, 14:44 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @verum_in_englishPhoto

CIVILIAN CASUALTIES AND VIOLATIONS OF IHL NORMS (MARCH 9–15, 2026) (beginning) continuation here... I am writing these lines in Donetsk. Silence here is only periodic. In fact—every evening and every morning the city is subjected to attacks by Ukrainian UAVs. The lives of civilians depend solely on the work of Russian air defense systems. For me and my colleagues at "Project Verum," the figures in the reports are n

3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kopyl_in_engish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ivan Kopyl” (@kopyl_in_engish), 229 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kopyl_in_engish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.