감사합니다 봉크가이 형님 USELESS도 화이팅
❤19

Channel
@koockdegen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
537subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002854939933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @koockdegen |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 10 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/koockdegen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 537 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 540 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 540 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
131 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 95 | 72.5% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 19.8% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 4.58% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.53% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 11 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
감사합니다 봉크가이 형님 USELESS도 화이팅
❤19
우선 1퍼 물량 CTO하려고 뒤로 챙겨둔거 먼저 말 안해서 마음이 조금이라도 상하신분 있다면 죄송합니다. 그래도 아직 코인은 여전히 잘 살아있고 책임감 있게 할수있는데 까지는 커뮤니티 잘 운영해볼테니까 너무 비꼬지만 마시고 도와주실분은 도와주셨으면 좋겠습니다.
❤27👍5👏2
그냥 님들 말따라 커뮤니티 관리나 열심히 하겠습니다
👍8🔥4❤2
근데 뭐 나햄이랑 얘기도 잘 끝냈고 별로 악감정이 생길만한 사람도 아니라 서로 잘 얘기 끝냈습니다.
솔직히 나는 사실 별 생각 없음 근데 채널 바이럴 할 생각에 글쓴게 제일 큼 ㅈㅅ 서로 싸우지들 말고 사이좋게 지내자
❤4
근데 뭐 나햄한테 디엠으로 사과받았고 나도 별 생각없어서 cto한거나 여전히 관리 하겠음
❤7
맞습니다!!! 님들 연료삼아서 대성공 거두려고 했습니다!!!!
❤6
아이시발거 걍 1퍼 물량은 채팅방 사람들만 알고가고 모르는 애새끼들 연료삼아 대성공 거두려했다고 왜 말을못해 0.1퍼라 구라치고 펌핑할라했다 미안허다 그럼되잖아 뭔 시발 쿨병 쳐돌아서 쿨하게 글쓰면 다되는줄알어 시발럼이 좋게만봤는데 역겨운건 역겨운거야 새꺄 내말이 틀렸으면 댓글달아
그냥 차라리 정직하게 뒷지갑 1퍼 있으니까 3퍼 태운다 하던지 반대로 3퍼를 야금야금 던져서 수익화 할껄 그랬음
난 사실 관심없었다가 궁금해서 물어봄 0.1퍼만 들고 있는거로 쉴링했는데 알고보니 cto때 말했던 1퍼가 뒷지갑에 있다 이걸 이제 말하는건 쉴링자체가 정직하진 못했다라는거임? 사람들이 cto 내역 초기내역까지 dyor 하는게 맞는거니깐? 영향력이 있으면 첨부터 추가 물량은 1퍼 있었다라고 하는게 더 깔끔했을것같은데 다같이 돈벌러 온거니 어느정도 과장된 쉴링은 이해간다만 저건 속이는 수준 아닌가 싶은데
존나 은혜로운 과장님이 물량 얼마 못먹은거 아니냐고 0.5% 때주셨음. 아리가또
❤5
cto 시작할때 했던말임
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @koockdegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,096,716 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Koock 디젠룸” (@koockdegen), 537 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/koockdegen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.