Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НЕПСИХОЛОГИЯ

@konsultars

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

532subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002673730551
TypeChannel
Username@konsultars
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/konsultars

Growth

5325345336 August 2026 — 534 subscribers6 August 2026 — 534 subscribers14 August 2026 — 532 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 532–534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:48532-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:45534no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:35534first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 532 subscribers
Avg views / post
81.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,620
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC55 viewsread 6 August 2026

Послушайте еще и эту историю. Клянусь Аллахом, если хорошо подготовиться духовно(поработать чуть-чуть прежде над якыном и получить знания того, как правильно делается этот ибадат и приехать туда, избегая туристические движения и другой явный мункар, который, к сожалению там творится порой)и поехать в Хадж или Умра — то многие проблемы в жизни человека решаться и будут открыты двери и придет облегчение. Однако к этой

6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC55 viewsread 6 August 2026

А мы как обычно делаем, прочитали кое как и потом бросаемся к причинам будучи разочарованными в методах сунны. Тут нужно не сдаваться — обвинить необходимо себя, свою слабость якына в Аллахе, потом с унижением и нуждой просить Аллаха исправить это состояние. Не получается самим — ищите тех, кто научит вас развивать эту убежденность и учитесь у них.

6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC50 viewsread 6 August 2026

Еще один нюанс: если мы читаем, и не получается собраться духовно — просите это у Аллаха. Говорите: о Аллах, увеличь мою убежденность и исправь мое духовное состояние так, чтобы эти средства из сунны принесли мне пользу. И эта мольба также должна быть постоянной и сильной.

6 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC46 viewsread 6 August 2026

Тут также почему-то люди думают, что одного раза достаточно, чтобы боль прошла, но не учитывают свое состояние убежденности — если оно слабое, то одного раза может быть мало, нужно пробовать много раз пытаясь сосредоточиться и в сердце собрать свою убежденность и надежду на Аллаха и делать эту практику. Даже если вам нужно пить таблетки, прописанные врачами, то все равно сначала, перед приемом таблетки, напомните се

6 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026

Тут мы делали короткие записи о том, какие ошибки бывают у использующих методы лечения Кораном и практиками дуа из сунны.

6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC49 viewsread 6 August 2026

Это сборник аятов от Шейха Халида аль-Хибши, да сохранит его Аллах. Принцип такой же — читаем для других на воду(человек потом пьет эту воду с намерением снискать шифа от Аллаха) и поплевываем в ладошки без слюны и обтираем человека после чтения с намерением снискать для него исцеление от Аллаха.

6 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC50 viewsread 6 August 2026

Практика чтения аятов для шифа. Она не такая трудная для обычных людей.

6 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC54 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ, أَعُوذُ بِاللَّهِ وَقُدْرَتِهِ مِنْ شَرِّ مَا أَجِدُ وَأُحَاذِرُ (Би-сми Ллях) — трижды. (А‘узу би-Лляхи ва кудрати-хи мин шарри ма аджиду ва ухазир) — семь раз. Передают, что однажды ‘Усман бин Абу-ль-‘Ас ас-Сакафи пожаловался посланнику Аллаха, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, на боль, которую он испытывал с тех пор, как принял ислам, и посланник Аллаха, да благословит его и приветствует,

6 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC62 viewsread 6 August 2026

Сказал имам Ибн Батталь, да помилует его Аллах: «В возложении правой руки на больного — это способ утешения для него, а также средство для того, что понять тяжесть его болезни(т.е проявить эмпатию, примерить на себя то, как он себя чувствует.прим.переводчика), чтобы затем более качественно и сильнее обратиться с мольбой к Аллаху о его исцелении. Также возможно навещающий больного прочитает ему рукъя(исцеляющие аяты

6 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC67 viewsread 6 August 2026

‏قال الإمام ابن بطال رحمه الله: ‏في وضع اليد على المريض تأنيس له ‏وتعرُّف لشدة مرضه ليدعو له بالعافية ‏على حسب ما يبدو له منه ، وربما رقاه ‏بيده ومسح على ألمه بما ينتفع به العليل ‏إذا كان العائد صالحاً. فتح الباري لابن حجر (150/10).

6 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC53 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @al_qushairy

Нафс любит обиду, потому что обида позволяет чувствовать собственную правоту. И пока человек обижен, он почти всегда видит только чужую ошибку. Обида очень легко превращается в скрытое высокомерие.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @konsultars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 382,497 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕПСИХОЛОГИЯ” (@konsultars), 532 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konsultars.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.