Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ₊‧♰໒ 𝐊𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢 𝐏𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐚 { 𝐰𝐨𝐨𝐟 } - 🕊

Channel

₊‧♰໒ 𝐊𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢 𝐏𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐚 { 𝐰𝐨𝐨𝐟 } - 🕊

@konfi64

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

58subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002777001716
TypeChannel
Username@konfi64
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/konfi64

Growth

5812 Aug 2026, 19:33 — 58 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 03:58 — 58 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:3313 Aug 2026, 03:58
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:5858no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:3358first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 1 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

239 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51883816753771627714117.2%
custom 52424634611867626793414.2%
custom 53728022925525733123414.2%
custom 5402445933491293138197.95%
custom 5409018418865132146197.95%
🕊197.95%
custom 5240461418016305780187.53%
custom 5233540825543113424166.69%
custom 5212927920279926252104.18%
custom 521294238572977799072.93%
custom 521342533332737873962.51%
custom 530525949512176841262.51%
custom 523576733658935606952.09%
custom 546781524554208115031.26%
custom 526279577194149440420.837%

Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 02:34 UTC116 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ого коммы вернулись так то я вернула их ещё в феврале когда думала что сделаю пост на свой день рождения ,но не стала делать поста Скетч за 10 минут ,ахахахах Вот то да... Я сидячие позы по пробовала делать А ещё скоро вроде будет пост уже с чем то не скетчевым , Рефом

custom 521292792027992625210custom 52129423857297779907custom 52134253333273787396custom 52627957719414944042custom 54024459334912931382

11 Jan 2026, 02:08 UTC255 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вообще ещё вот это есть ,но я до ума это довести не могу что бы не рисовалось тут ,плохо

custom 54024459334912931388custom 52424634611867626797custom 54090184188651321467custom 54678152455420811503custom 51883816753771627712custom 53728022925525733122

11 Jan 2026, 01:04 UTC231 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мне немного нечего вам показывать.. Просто разное что то срарое что то нет ,но в основном тут старые скетчи.

custom 537280229255257331213custom 54024459334912931387custom 53052594951217684126custom 52404614180163057804

18 Dec 2025, 12:42 UTC286 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

..тяфтяфтяф

custom 518838167537716277116🕊8custom 54090184188651321468custom 52335408255431134244custom 52404614180163057802custom 53728022925525733122custom 54024459334912931382

7 Nov 2025, 09:39 UTC340 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

₊‧♰໒ у меня не было идей что рисовать по этому что то от балды что бы занять время и не думать ,я знаю что персонаж сам на себя не похож тут ,да...да... Но опять таки то рисовалось не что бы было красиво ,а просто что бы ночь чем то занять ..⏳

custom 524246346118676267913custom 52404614180163057808custom 53728022925525733128custom 52335408255431134245

3 Nov 2025, 20:32 UTC347 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

₊‧♰໒ комишечкааааа У меня стабильно проблемы какие то с оформлением видимо...

custom 518838167537716277117🕊11custom 52335408255431134244custom 54090184188651321464custom 53728022925525733123custom 52357673365893560692custom 52424634611867626792

3 Nov 2025, 00:53 UTC275 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Думаю должна сказать У автора все хорошо ,это ПРОСТО скетч который мне понравился как выглядит Не думайте и листайте дальше ,хд,утром или днём будут норм арты 🐰 Добрых всем снов,буду рада реакциям

custom 53728022925525733126custom 52404614180163057804custom 52424634611867626793

1 Nov 2025, 11:38 UTCviews —

₊‧♰໒ 𝐊𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢 𝐏𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐚 { 𝐰𝐨𝐨𝐟 } - 🕊 pinned a photo

1 Nov 2025, 09:12 UTC637 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

. ₊‧໒ РЕЕЕЕЕЕКВЕСТЫ 🎞️ 🌞🌟🌞🌟🌞🌟🌞🌟🌞 Отправляйте своих вкуснящечек в комм ,конфи наконец словила мотивацию что то делать ☝🏻 Могу нарисрвать как скече ( 3е фото) ,так и не скетчевое ,это НА МОЕ УСМОТРЕНИЕ. 🌞🌟🌞🌟🌞🌟🌞🌟🌞 •Репост не обязательно,но среди тех кто сделает репост в канальчик я обязательно нарисую что либо ,не всем ,но нескольким. А для остальных зависит от того понравиться ли мне ваш перс •Подписка тоже

custom 52424634611867626799custom 51883816753771627716custom 52335408255431134243custom 52357673365893560693

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @konfi64. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 302,926 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“₊‧♰໒ 𝐊𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢 𝐏𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐚 { 𝐰𝐨𝐨𝐟 } - 🕊” (@konfi64), 58 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konfi64.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.