8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,312–13,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 22:26
13,315
-7
13 Aug 2026, 11:48
13,322
-6
12 Aug 2026, 12:53
13,328
-3
11 Aug 2026, 12:52
13,331
+4
10 Aug 2026, 11:41
13,327
-5
8 Aug 2026, 07:56
13,332
-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:44
13,334
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:01
13,334
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.82%
avg views ÷ 13,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.749%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
23 (2 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
18,781
Reactions total
131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
327
Videos
737
Links
185
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
11m 52s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
216 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
90
41.7%
🔥
51
23.6%
👍
50
23.1%
👎
16
7.41%
🥰
4
1.85%
🍌
2
0.926%
❤🔥
1
0.463%
😱
1
0.463%
🤡
1
0.463%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
8.70%
2 of 23 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
146
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,480
over 21 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvwvnN6
1
8 August 2026
8 August 2026
2VtzqxQairF
1
15 August 2026
15 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🎁 5 ПОДАРКОВ для первого заработка на десертах
Хотите иметь дополнительный заработок из дома на десертах и бенто-тортах? Или уже печете для семьи и друзей и думаете начать брать первые заказы?
На бесплатном вебинаре «7 ключей к заработку на десертах из дома» вы узнаете о важных шагах, которые помогут из новичка и любителя стать трендовым кондитером и начать зарабатывать от 50 000 руб в месяц!!
И чтобы вы могли сра…
В подарок – 4 декора + 4 начинки БЕНТО, которые повторит новичок
Шеф-кондитер Ольга Шмукста проводит БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ вебинар для начинающих «Как стать домашним кондитером» 🔥
На эфире вы узнаете все секреты быстрого старта на десертах – от любительского до профессионального уровня со стабильным доходом от 50 тысяч в месяц и базой постоянных клиентов 😉
А также в конце эфира получите мини-курс по трендовым бенто-тортам.
…
Заказчик захотел такой дизайн со стразами 🤔
Но девушка сама сразу написала: Это стразы для рукоделия! Поэтому я поняла, что человек в курсе, что это несъедобно 🙏🏻
Изолировала на шоколад каждую стразу 👌🏻
Торт был на девичник ☺️ Решила к упаковке добавить милый топпер с колечками 💍
КАК вам такой дизайн? 🤔🥰
Шайн брайт лайк э даймонд, так сказать 😂✨
💎 АРТИКУЛ на стразы: 396089216 WB (как на торте), или похожие
586391
Упаковка - это первое, что видит ваш клиент. И именно она формирует впечатление о десерте 😛
🍰В Estetica Deserta мы создаём упаковку для десертов, которая помогает подчеркнуть стиль вашего бренда и сделать подачу ещё более эстетичной.
В нашем ассортименте:
🍫Самосборные коробки
✅Практичное и универсальное решение для разных видов десертов.
✅Коробки доступны с глухой крышкой или прозрачной ПЭТ-крышкой, которая позвол…
Кондитер и не знаешь как разнообразить упаковку?
Не умеешь сочетать цвета лент, подбирать коробку, пакеты, и не понимаешь какую открытку прикрепить в этот раз?
Артикулы на ВБ на упаковку, которая удивляет с момента передачи торта:
#193719194 — коробки для тортов на 1-1,5кг, подходят для высоких декоров, а также удобно оставлять свой логотип печатью
#232553405 — пакеты отличного качества, беру в разных цветах для те…
❤8🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @konditer_wb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@konditer_wb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@estetica named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cake School Алина Макарова @cake_school · 115,295 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Энди шеф — бесплатные рецепты @blog_andychef · 117,384 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
venera_os 🍍 Венера Осепчук @venera_oss · 144,087 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WB для кондитеров” (@konditer_wb), 13,315 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konditer_wb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
