Channel
@kompasfx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
576subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001251083002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kompasfx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kompasfx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 576 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 577 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 579 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 579 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (18 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 49 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Статистика второго счета: +25 358% прибыли за 21 месяц торговли При очень консервативной просадке в 14.40%. Простая арифметика: 💰Вложив всего $100, сейчас вы бы имели $25 358 💰С $1 000 ваш капитал вырос бы до $253 580 🤔Почему советнику доверяют: 1. Работает с Ноября 2021 года 2. Максимальная просадка всего 15% 3. Ограничение суточного убытка до 5% 4. Не использует опасные стратегии (мартингейл, сетки) Можно продо…
🗓Результаты советника за 58 месяцев📈 Счет 1: +107 573% за 29 месяцев Счет 2: +25 358% за 21 месяц Счет 3): +367% за 7 месяцев С ноября 2021г мой советник с 500$ принёс более 354000$ 🗓2021 год Ноябрь +77% Декабрь +32% 🗓2022 год Январь +49% Февраль +32% Март +32% Апрель +18% Май +36% Июнь +18% Июль +31% Август +19% Сентябрь +44% Октябрь +19% Ноябрь +17% Декабрь +20% 🗓2023 год Январь +26% Февраль +34% Март +19% Апрель…
🚀 +379% / +18 990$ 📈 Просадка не превысила 11% 🦾 📈Общая статистика счетов: Счет №1: +107 573% (за 29 месяцев) Счет №2: +23 520% (за 21 месяц) Счет №3: +379% (с 1 Января 2026года) Автоматический советник для торговли золотом продолжает демонстрировать стабильные результаты своей торговли! Торговые параметры: 🔵Take Profit: 60.0 пунктов 🔴Stop Loss: 30.0 пунктов 🛑Максимальная просадка: 15% 📊Средняя прибыль за месяц: 3…
🔥Мой торговый советник разработан для обеспечения стабильного и консервативного прироста капитала 📈 🗓 Успешно торгует с ноября 2021 года. Его долгосрочная эффективность подтверждена официальными мониторингами. 🛡Встроенный алгоритм предотвращения убытков гарантирует 100% защиту от непредсказуемых рыночных ситуаций. Ограничение суточных потерь составляет не более 5% от размера счёта. 🦾 Придерживается консервативного…
🚀 +360% / +18 029$ 📈 с 01.01.2026г🗓 Просадка не превысила 11% 🦾 📈Общая статистика счетов: Счет №1: +107 573% (за 29 месяцев) Счет №2: +23 520% (за 21 месяц) Счет №3: +360% (с 1 Января 2026года) Можно продолжать не верить, а можно использовать инструмент, в который вложено много сил и времени. Я не обещаю чудеса 👉 я показываем реальный PROFIT, который получаем сами уже больше четырех лет 📈 ➡️ Написать разработчик…
Почему мой советник эффективен? 🤔 У него нет нервной системы. Ему не нужно пить кофе, он не впадает в тильт и не пытается «отомстить» рынку. Он просто железно исполняет алгоритм: ✅ Строгий стоп-лосс и тейк-профит. ✅ Вход только по сигналу, а не «потому что кажется». ✅ Работа 24/5 без усталости и выгорания. Хватит бороться с собой. Позволь алгоритму делать то, что он умеет лучше всего — торговать с холодной головой
🎞Видео отчет торговли моего советника на двух счетах Счет 1: 🗓 За 21 месяц 🚀 С депозита 10 000$ 📈 Рост на +25 358% / +185 491$ чистой прибыли Счет 2: 🗓 За 7 месяцев 🚀 С депозита 5000$ 📈 Рост на +344% / +17 200$ чистой прибыль Почему мой советник эффективнее ручной торговли? У него нет нервной системы. Ему не нужно пить кофе, он не впадает в тильт и не пытается «отомстить» рынку. Он просто железно исполняет алгорит…
Зачем анализировать графики сутками и рисковать вручную, если можно доверить это профессиональному софту? Пока вы думаете, мой советник УЖЕ сделал +344% к депозиту! Реальные результаты работы моего торгового советника. Статистика говорит сама за себя, и цифры здесь вместо тысячи слов: 💰 Стартовый депозит: всего $5 000 🚀 Чистая прибыль: +$17 200$ Полностью автоматизирует процесс — торгует строго по алгоритму, без…
🚀 +344% / +17 200$ 📈 с 01.01.2026г🗓 На данный момент просадка не превышала 1️⃣1️⃣Процентов ‼️ 📈Общая статистика счетов: Счет №1: +107 573% (за 29 месяцев) Счет №2: +23 520% (за 21 месяц) Счет №3: +344% (с 1 Января 2026года) 🤔Почему советнику доверяют: 🔥Работает с Ноября 2021 года 🔥Максимальная просадка всего 15% 🔥Ограничение суточного убытка до 5% 🔥Не использует опасные стратегии (Мартингейл, сетки) ➡️ Написать ра…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kompasfx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 902,836 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kompasfx named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🤖Советник для ФОРЕКС 🦾” (@kompasfx), 576 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kompasfx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.