2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 222–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 05:22
223
no change
27 Sept 2026, 04:47
223
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,780
Videos
≈575
Links
≈1,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5456231177578887108
7
30.4%
🔥
6
26.1%
👍
5
21.7%
🖕
4
17.4%
🤔
1
4.35%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 22 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
263
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
307
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 22 February 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#Важное
Я долго думал над этим, и принял решение.
Наш канал вынужден закрыться. Навсегда. Причины просты:
- Фандом угасает с каждым днём. Всё меньше и меньше людей заинтересованы в нём.
- Наш канал терпит упадки. Новых подписчиков нету уже давно. Не вижу смысла продолжать.
Итак, я благодарен всем тем кто следил за нашим каналом и помогал в развитии. Отдельную благодарность хочу выразить админам, за то что не бро…
#DaFuqBoom • #интересное
Вот такую шапку можно купить в магазине DaFuq?!Boom! за 30,00$! (~2311₽ )
Если хотите, могу сделать обзор на все товары в магазине DaFuq?!Boom! !
MAKS BOOM Подписаться
#DaFuqBoom • #интересное
В чате DaFuq?!Boom! возник такой диалог:
quarky
Oзначает ли это, что эпизод выйдет через 10 дней.
Bryan-WoldPackage
Я думаю, люди просто хотели, чтобы был открыт теоретический чат. Это не значит, что выйдет какой-то эпизод.
MAKS BOOM Подписаться
#реклама #skibiditoilet
Всем привет
Я хочу порекомендовать
Свой новый дискорд сервер с спойлерами скибиди,моими анимациями
В этом дискорде вы так же можете делиться своими же фанмейдами.
И спокойно общаться.
https://discord.gg/wA9WSN2r9
#DomStudio • #Спойлер
Спойлер к Skibidi Toilet Multiverse 049!
Подпись гласит:
049 серия будет поделена на две части!
MAKS BOOM Подписаться
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @komanda_Naggetsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
RAZOPLAY @razoplay · 20,511 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥Maks?!Boom! #TeamSkibidi🔥” (@komanda_Naggetsa), 223 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komanda_Naggetsa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
