Channel
@kolosscomp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001105780067 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kolosscomp |
| Description | ⚡️Самые свежие новости, авторские статьи, разбор ico проектов. Сигналы трейдеров и аналитиков Kolosscoin company. @tKolosscoin channel Админы: @koloss08 и @vais_vais ⚡️Наш чат @kolosscrypto |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 30 April 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kolosscomp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 20 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
После максимума в 20 тыс за бтс в 2018 году последовала коррекция и отскок летом 19-го года до 13 тысяч за бтс. Задолго до халвинга. Если провести аналогию, то сейчас, до разворота, возможно движение цены до 46 тыс. В любом случае нужно быть готовым к движению вниз.
35 тыс за биткоин. Будет ли ралли безоткатное до 300 тыс? Или повторный тест 16-18 тыс и трудный путь к 100тыс? Каждый решает сам. Мне ближе вариант 2.
Плавно идём к 20 тыс за бтс
Сбудется прогноз?
Биткоин по 30 тыс. Почти пол пути к прошлым максимумам. Откуда начнется разворот? Ждём черного лебедя.
Многие альткоины лежат на дне. Их рост может превзойти рост биткоина в разы. На бычьем рынке.
Коррекция идёт по плану. До конца 23 года ещё будет возможность купить по хорошей цене.
График намекает на бесконечный рост. Но мы знаем, чем это все оканчивается. Раньше халвинга, взрывного роста не стоит ждать. А падений ещё впереди немало.
Добьют и 20тыс сегодня. Шортистов знатно стригут. Могут и до 32 тыс тянуть резину. Потом к 20 вернуть. Чудотворцы!
TWT себе тихонько отрастает.
И да. Наверное немного поздно. Но TWT токен очень неплохо выглядит. Не помешает немного взять и хранить год-два.
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kolosscomp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kolosscoin channel” (@kolosscomp), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kolosscomp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.