Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

KOI DAO

@koigroup_s

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

694subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001596810514
TypeChannel
Username@koigroup_s
Descriptionby for people Cooperation: @jordan2200, @darth_adm Manager: @vlad_rzhk (no payment) / @dimmix_u , @bekmesha
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/koigroup_s

Growth

6947 Aug 2026, 06:06 — 694 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 694 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:067 Aug 2026, 06:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 693–695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:16694no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:06694first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
353
Videos
4
Links
442

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1473.7%
🤡315.8%
15.26%
👎15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2024 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jan 2026, 08:21 UTC187 viewsread 7 August 2026

Общий шалом, мало кто знает не знает, что я в личный бренд спрыгнул и больше особо не кручу все эти дропчики/темки/проекты @kisism911 Залетайте, если желание имеете, скоро стримчик тут будет, да и в целом полезный контент стараюсь лить. Больше у меня про рынок/торговлю/алго/инфру и т.д. Т.е. как открутить какой-нибудь проект рили контента нет, за этим туда не идите. Но шуточки бывают, шуточки плохие, их сам осужд

19 Nov 2025, 11:49 UTC311 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вы выжили на этом рынке? Честные ответы нужны. Для статистики

  1. Обнулился35%
  2. Осталось на поесть >10к$37%
  3. Держусь <50к$14%
  4. Кайфую >100к$2%
  5. Я кит >200к$12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jul 2025, 20:02 UTC521 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Охренеть, здесь до сих пор неплохие просмотры и осталось 900 людей. Хотя меня тут уже годика 2 как нет.... живые есть?

👍7

27 Jul 2024, 19:29 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 7 August 2026

Проект который может Canza Finance - проект, который создает новый уровень финансовых услуг с использованием WEB3 и DeFi. Они собрали $5,75М инвестиций от Polychain Capital, HashKey Capita и других топовых фондов. Недавно, CoinMarketCap взяли Canza Finance под инкубацию в своей новой программе Accelerator CMC Labs. Поэтому, когда начнется альтсезон, то думаю, что проект себя покажет очень хорошо! За апдейтами мо

8 Jul 2024, 12:47 UTC870 viewsread 7 August 2026

Клеймим поинты от DeBank https://debank.com/claim?r=88758

28 Jun 2024, 15:44 UTC740 viewsread 7 August 2026

COFFEE сейл начинается уже закончился собрали более $3 млн Проект анонсировал партнёрство с Notcoin и вошел в кампанию в их приложении. Можно начать фармить $NOT за социальные задачи - тык. Есть партнерства (Hot Wallet, Notcoin и Gotbit) Ждем иксы? Официальные медиа проекта: Сайт Канал Чат Twitter

27 Jun 2024, 20:49 UTC579 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новый щиток на солане $COFFEE — создан в партнерстве с авторами MemeFi. Уже есть договорённости с топ биржами + в мм готбит, так что вполне себе возможны иксы после пресейла. Также там и готбиты есть. Будут качать Подробную инфу о пресейле обещают дропнуть сначала в чате, а потом уже в канал и тветтер, так что сейчас буду следить активно следить за их соц сетями: Сайт проекта Канал проекта Twitter проекта

🤡3👍1

26 Jun 2024, 09:46 UTC485 viewsread 7 August 2026

Бабки давать тут будут — https://t.me/WaterCoinCISBot?start=389359353 Зайдите киньте кошель и ждите

19 May 2024, 19:17 UTC658 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Серия дропов от GameSwift GameSwift - это не просто игровая платформа, это целая Web3 инфраструктура с инновационным модульным блокчейном и своим токеном. Платформа раздала 2 дропа в токене $STAR, и сейчас ждем еще целых 4 Как залутать дроп Для получения дропа нужно застейкать $GSWIFT. Для начала его нужно купить или свапнуть, покупаем на Bybit, свап на сайте. Дальше переходим во вкладку Staking и кидаем больше 2

👍1👎1

14 May 2024, 20:18 UTC529 viewsread 7 August 2026

Так, ну я человек простой, вижу 2 коммента - имею два билета. Не вижу смысла запариваться над этим слишком люто, поэтому выдам билетики им. Не все живут в Мск и не все смогут пойти, думаю будет честно отдать тем, кто реально пойдет) Увидимся на The Trends

14 May 2024, 13:59 UTC486 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет, завтра мероприятие The Trends и ваш дед добыл для вас билеты)) Разыграю два билета просто так) Тыкните коммент и реакцию на пост, по какому-нибудь критерию вас подберу) Часть команды уже в МСК и заряжена на это мероприятие) Будем рады увидеться там с вами) Ожидаем там очень хорошего нетворкинга и огромного кол-ва впечатлений) UPD: Мероприятие оффлайн и вы должно быть в Мск, если что, чтобы точно прий

👍3

10 May 2024, 09:05 UTC476 viewsread 7 August 2026

Как круто провести время? Отметьте в своем календаре 15–16 мая 2024 года! В Москве пройдет мероприятие THE TRENDS 2.0, которое посетит наша команда. The Trends — уникальный, международный, технологический, 2-х дневный форум про глобальные тренды и новейшие технологии. - Первый форум The Trends, который прошел 15–16 ноября 2023 года в Москве, стал одним из лучших форумов 2023 года. - Планируется более 4000 участни

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @koigroup_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Nov 2025, 11:49 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Вы выжили на этом рынке? Честные ответы нужны. Для статистики

  1. Обнулился35%
  2. Осталось на поесть >10к$37%
  3. Держусь <50к$14%
  4. Кайфую >100к$2%
  5. Я кит >200к$12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2024 to 29 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 770,842 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KOI DAO” (@koigroup_s), 694 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/koigroup_s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.