Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ꮶᴏди Ꭹинᴛᴇᴩ

Channel

Ꮶᴏди Ꭹинᴛᴇᴩ

@kogu_vint

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004445776163
TypeChannel
Username@kogu_vint
Created17 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded25 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kogu_vint

Growth

1525 Sept 2026, 10:47 — 15 subscribers25 Sept 2026, 11:22 — 15 subscribers25 Sept 2026, 10:4725 Sept 2026, 11:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:2215no change
25 Sept 2026, 10:4715first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 17 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.0%
avg views ÷ 15 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held5 (17 September 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total66
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤529.4%
👀423.5%
🆒317.6%
👾317.6%
😡211.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Матч выиграли, всё круто, классно, но делать домашку после всего этого — отстой. После матча вообще ни на что не способены, кроме как лежать и смотреть в потолок. За нас Джереми пишет сочинение, правда, за оценку он не ручается. Ну, главное, что написано. Если завтра получим двойки, будем знать кого благодарить

❤1👾1

21 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC16 views5 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Мы с Жаном хотели поиграть во что-то, но в итоге весь вечер смотрели и обсуждали матчи других команд, комментируя их игру. . это было очень увлекательно. В следующий раз мы обязательно поиграем, а то совсем увлеклись обсуждением матчей и забыли про нашу запланированную игру!!

❤3👾1🆒1

21 Sept 2026, 04:43 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

#грррпонедельник кто вообще придумал тренировки и университеты, почему мы должны туда приходить в такую рань. не хочу вылезать из своей теплой кроватки, но вставать надо, иначе опоздаем. я уже очень усталм, просто подумав об этом. за окном идет дождь, понимаете, как хочется спать. отпустите нас спать до обеда

👀2😡2❤1🆒1

17 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

здрасте, я — ☺️ОДИ ☺️ИНТЕР. !! я студенты в Университете Южной Калифорнии и одни из защитников Троянцев. сюда будем выкладывать все что сердце пожелает, если ленььь не будет ..🪙 инфо

👀2👾1🆒1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kogu_vint. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ꮶᴏди Ꭹинᴛᴇᴩ” (@kogu_vint), 15 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kogu_vint.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.