More Website Development https://alpha-bot-calls.com/ Worked with an amazing designer @HodlerZen to bring a fun and enagaging landing page to the @alphaBotCalls ecosystem. Coded functionality for custom scripts like the OTSea orderbook section at the bottom of the page.

Channel
Ko-Contributes 🥥🌴
@kocontributes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001987201428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kocontributes |
| Description | Working in Web3 I get to be part of and help build amazing new projects. These are my Ko-Contributes! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 1 June 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kocontributes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 1 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 16
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2023 to 5 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Can’t express my appreciation enough
Will definitely be recommending your work to other projects
Thank you Kokos 🤝
Thanks Kokos!! Sleep well mate, really appreciate you
Brilliant work @kokosthief, thank you!
Thanks @kokosthief we are fortunate to have the best in web3 marketing in our team. Lots they just can’t wait to roll out. Thanks for your support 🙏
Telegram Moderating & Security Bots Teams like @fx1_sports_portal and @PROOFPlatform asked for my help to ensure smooth token launches. I often work with teams to prepare: ✅ Public-facing portal - Users need to verify themselves through. ✅ Private team chat - Connected to the group chat with admin log channels ✅ Private group chat - Ensuring all crucial settings are properly set before building it out. ✅ Install s…
Whitepaper I start to get noticed by community members and connected to more projects who need asssistance in the space. I even find myself writing a white paper from time to time and setting up more GitBooks for projects.
🙏1
@kokosthief hey my friend wants to do business with you
Web Development https://portal.defirobot.org/ Created a wicked landing page for DeFi-Robot in React.js Streamlined with main CTA bringing more users straight into Telgram to begin the user journey. Links up to the Dapp, GitBook with light/dark mode. Coded an interactive visual demonstration of some of their utiilty which I'm proud about.
👍1
Thanks @kokosthief ❤️ really great thread
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kocontributes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kocontributes named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ko-Contributes 🥥🌴” (@kocontributes), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kocontributes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.