Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Татьяна КочетковаlПарикмахер|СПБ

Channel

Татьяна КочетковаlПарикмахер|СПБ

@kochetkovatatyana

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

265subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001960843617
TypeChannel
Username@kochetkovatatyana
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kochetkovatatyana

Growth

26514 September 2026 — 265 subscribers16 September 2026 — 265 subscribers14 September 202616 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 264–266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 11:56265no change
14 Sept 2026, 20:22265first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 7 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 265 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.6
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held10 (7 September 2026 – 14 September 2026)
Views total516
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍952.9%
❤847.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC34 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Блонд без жёлтизны: пять заблуждений, что терзают душу дома 🌿 Жёлтый блонд — это страдание. Девушка покидает салон с холодным, чистым, драгоценным оттенком. А спустя две недели возвращается с желтизной и вопрошает: «Что случилось?» Случилось то, что домашний уход убивает цвет. Пять главных ошибок, что рождаются в быту. Осмотритесь. 1. Шампунь с агрессивными сульфатами 🧼 Он пенится и смывает грязь. Но вместе с гря…

11 Sept 2026, 05:18 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Вчерашний путь: пять душ, три блонда, одна слеза блаженства. 🍵 Вчерашний день стал зеркалом, в котором отразилась суть моего ремесла. Пять гостей. Три блонда. Одна коррекция. И одна слеза. Не горечи, а радости. Утром пришла та, чьи волосы искали мастера целый год. Усталые пряди, цвет в тумане, надежда на исходе. Мы сели, и я поняла: здесь не просто краска, здесь возвращение веры. И когда она увидела своё отражение…

❤4

10 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Video

До: солнце, как строгий учитель, иссушило брюнетку за лето. Длина обрела рыжий оттенок, глубина цвета ушла в тень, а концы взывали к обновлению. Как сказал бы мастер: «Смотри на свою тень, и ты увидишь свою форму». 🍂 После: тонирование на низком проценте оксида вернуло цвету достоинство, маска подарила мягкость, а стрижка обновила форму. Никаких резких движений — лишь тихая, деликатная коррекция. Как в притче о воде…

👍2

10 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC44 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня в рубрике До/после Было: рыжий подтон у корней, резкая граница, цвет не живёт. Стало: мягкий переход, холодный русый, цвет дышит. Мастер до закрасила корень плотно — получила рыжий подтон и отсутствие плавности. Я пошла другим путём: рассверлила корневую зону и прокрасила волосы между в свой холодный русый цвет. Теперь цвет выглядит естественно, а корни будут отрастать плавнее. Как вам такое преображение…

9 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Стрижка, которая старит: 5 форм, от которых лучше отказаться после 40 ✂️ Знаете, я часто вижу женщин, которые приходят с запросом: «Хочу выглядеть свежее, но не знаю, что менять». И когда я смотрю на их стрижку, я понимаю: проблема не в возрасте, не в цвете волос, а в форме. Которая просто перестала работать. 🤔 Одна и та же женщина может выглядеть на 35, а может — на 45. И разница часто не в морщинах и не в макияже.…

👍2

8 Sept 2026, 07:53 UTC51 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Блонд — он как капризный ребенок. Красивый, светлый, но стоит ошибиться с уходом — и всё, цвет уже не тот, блеска нет, а на голове не блонд, а «что-то жёлтое и непонятное». Я часто вижу одну и ту же картину. Девушка делает дорогой блонд, а дома моет голову шампунем, который либо купила в супермаркете, либо оставила с «тёмных» времён. И потом удивляется: «Почему цвет потускнел? Почему появилась желтизна?» Ответ прост:…

8 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Video

Знаете это чувство, когда корни уже отросли, седина даёт о себе знать, а красить всю голову не хочется? 😔 Мы пошли другим путём: добавили светлые пряди у корней, сделали плавный переход ✨. Теперь цвет выглядит естественно, седина не видна, а лицо стало свежее 🌿. Как вам результат? 👇

👍3

7 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Video

Завивка для волос долговременный эффект !

👍2

7 Sept 2026, 05:19 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Выходные прошли и снова понедельник ! Поговорим почему после окрашивания волосы выглядят тусклыми через 2 недели? В салоне — конфетка. Блеск, сияние, цвет — как с картинки. А дома через пару недель — уже не то. Тускло, плоско, без жизни. И вы думаете: «Меня плохо покрасили? Краска не та?» Нет. Чаще всего дело в домашнем уходе. Я как парикмахер вижу это постоянно. Клиентка уходит от меня с идеальным цветом, а через 2…

❤2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kochetkovatatyana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ХОР НА ВЕСЬ ДВОР
@hor_dvor · 25,060
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Татьяна КочетковаlПарикмахер|СПБ” (@kochetkovatatyana), 265 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kochetkovatatyana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.