Channel
@knowledgism
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
170subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001686813880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @knowledgism |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/knowledgism |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 170 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 171 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 174 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 174 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 50.0% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 23.1% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2024 to 7 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Do you have a date tonight? Didn't think so. So, spend date night with me? Well, not just me but the tiktok garbage fail kids as well.... so, what are you doing? Need something fun to watch? In about an hour, I start my 6th TikTok LIVE and it is a late night edition! It should be fun watching many meltdown because there is no chance they could be wrong. Today with a 5:00 Clock Let's see if someone is ready to col…
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
If you aren’t subbed to Kaleb you best correct that. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP88g9SxU/
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
Liar Banjo doing Christ's work here. Straight up lying.
💩2👎1
A word to the wise. When your wife decides to do a project and drags you to Lowe’s to get the wood and the nails and screws and 2x4s And then needs you to cut all the wood and screw her project together. So you agree like a kind and helpful husband. So we get home and I’m laying out all the wood and it hits me. Why did I not double check her measurements. Back to Lowe’s I go. Short a full 14 feet in 2x4s. So I w…
😁2
American Creed; My Creed;: “I do not choose to be a common man. It is my right to be uncommon. I seek to develop whatever talents God gave me—not security. I do not wish to be a kept citizen, humbled and dulled by having the state look after me. I want to take the calculated risk; to dream and to build, to fail and to succeed. I refuse to barter incentive for a dole. I prefer the challenges of life to the guaranteed…
You may want to keep up with this story if you are a fan of Telegram. Its owner was arrested and facing many years due to Tekegram repeatedly ignoring police requests for access, love, chats etc. Privacy on the line again. Once you lose your rights. You will never get them back until we start over again. #1776 https://x.com/au_epic/status/1827494541374701645
👍2
People still writing me messages about Lesley’s model and how he will be able to explain it soon. I feel very alone since I’m the only one that sees that a 24 hour sun would expose a fatal flaw in all flat earth models. I don’t want to start calling people dumb but it looks like there may be no choice. Anyone saying that a 24 hour sun in the south doesn’t matter is LYING TO YOU! Blatantly! And they will continue …
👍7💩3👎1
I would think this goes without saying…. But clouds are never behind the sun. Your head is great. But you gotta use it.
I shouldn’t have to be the researcher checker. On my stream tonight, titled Bad Research ironically, someone was saying that the black dot on the sun as seen from webcams is actually evidence of a sun simulator. They said this because ‘Flat Works’ channel has caught a reflection of the black dot in the water. So of course I start thinking, well that’s weird. I’ll have to watch. I watch and should have known it’s …
👎2💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @knowledgism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KNOWLEDGISM” (@knowledgism), 170 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knowledgism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.