Channel
@knowledgebenefits
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
459subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001560966372 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @knowledgebenefits |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/knowledgebenefits |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 459 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 462 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 464 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 465 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 465 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
253 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 159 | 62.8% | |
| 👍 | 84 | 33.2% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 3.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2023 to 27 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ahādīth on praying four rak'ah before Salāt-al-'Asr and their authenticity: The hadīth narrated by ibn 'Umar رضي الله عنه that Prophet ﷺ said: "May Allah show mercy to a man who prays four rak'ah before Salāt-al-'Asr" - Narrated by Abu Dawud and at-Tirmidhi It is ma'lūl and not authentic according to Sh. Sulayman al-'Alwan, Sh. 'Abdullah as-Sa'd, Sh. Khalid al-Fulayj, and Sh. Mustafa al-'Adawi. As for the hadith …
❤8
The Reason We Fight - Sheikh Khalid al Fulayj (فك الله أسره) https://youtu.be/NbV7uysMLXs?feature=shared
❤12👍4
Concerning āyah 55 of al-Māidah, the books of tafsīr mention a hadīth in which a beggar came to 'Ali ibn Abi Tālib while he was in rukū' and 'Ali took off his ring and gave him it, so based on that some thought that "...and they give zakāh, and they bow down" means giving zakāh while bowing and that it specifically refers to 'Ali رضي الله عنه. Sheikh 'Abdullah as-Sa'd said "this hadith is bātil (false)." And elsewhe…
👍11❤1
Sheikh Abu Bakr al-Jazāiri رحمه الله (d. 2018 CE) in Nahr al Khayr, his commentary on his well-known tafsīr: Aysar-at-tafāsīr, said: "The scholars have said that indeed whoever seeks other than the judgement of Allah ta'ālā, whereby he isn't pleased with it, is a kāfir; and this is the conditon of the Jews, and the condition of the majority of the Muslims today whereby they weren't pleased with the judgement of Alla…
👍10🔥3❤1
Hadith benefit: Sheikh al-Muhaddith 'Abdullah as-Sa'd (فك الله أسره) : "In regard to Shabīb ibn Bishr al Bajali (hadith narrator), Yahya ibn Ma'īn declared him to be trustworthy, Abu Hātim ar-Rāzi said he is layyin (weak), while Ibn Hibban mentioned him in Kitāb ath-Thiqāt (book of trustworthy narrators) and said: 'he makes many mistakes'. What's most likely to be correct is that he (Shabīb) is hasan-al-hadīth (goo…
👍9❤6
Sheikh 'Abdullah as-Sa'd (حفظه الله): The most correct view is that the collection of ibn Hibban is more authentic than Sahih ibn Khuzayma, because ibn Khuzayma rahimahullah had leniency in narrating weak ahādīth that relate to fadhāil al-a'māl, particularly in the chapter of fasting in it's introduction he mentioned many weak ahādīth which are not sahīh, so ibn Hibban's book is more authentic; and the book of an-Na…
❤9👍4
Sheikh 'Abdullah as-Sa'd (حفظه الله): It is said that he (ibn 'Abd al-Hādi) was the most knowledgeable of the students of sheikh-ul-Islām [ibn Taymiyyah] in Hadīth, and it's been mentioned that ibn Muflih was the most knowledgeable of the students of sheikh-ul-Islām in fiqh, and ibn al-Qayyim was the most knowledgeable of the students of sheikh-ul-Islām in 'aqīdah and what relates to it. [تعليقات على حاشية كتاب الت…
👍5❤4
Sheikh al-Muhaddith 'Abdullah as-Sa'd (حفظه الله): According to my knowledge, those who were the most correct in relating ijmā' (consensus) were Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm and Abu al-'Abbās ibn Taymiyyah; and the most lenient was Abu 'Umar ibn 'Abd al-Barr. Even ibn al-Mundhir was stricter than him (ibn 'Abd al-Barr), ibn 'Abd al Barr was more lenient. Muwaffaq ad-Dīn ibn Qudāmā also had leniency in relating ijmā'; likew…
👍9❤5
Sheikh al-Muhaddith 'Abdullah as-Sa'd (حفظه الله): Sheikh-ul-Islām [ibn Taymiyyah] reported an ijmā' of the sahābah that the khawārij are not ruled as kuffār; and it is the correct view. When the tābi'īn came they differed in regard to takfīr of the khawārij, and likewise [the tabi'īn differed] in regard to takfīr of al-Hajjāj [ibn Yusūf]. The sahābah were in agreement on not making takfīr of al-Hajjāj. It's confirm…
🔥6❤1👍1
The Ruling on those who support the Rāfidha against ahl as-Sunnah - Sheikh Khālid al-Fulayj (فك الله أسره) https://youtu.be/dpeGq1i8Kfo?feature=shared
❤11
Sheikh Hamūd ibn 'Uqlā ash-Shu'aybi (رحمه الله) : The problem now is that people say the Ashā'irah are the closest people to ahl as-Sunnah; while knowing that if you look at them in terms of the attribute of speech, you find that they're in agreement with the Mu'tazilah [claiming] that Allah didn't speak nor say [anything]. And if you look at them in terms of al-qadar and the actions of the slaves, you find that the…
👍13❤3
Sheikh Sulaymān al-'Alwān comments on Mursi and Hamas https://youtu.be/2-is7-NTbHM?feature=shared
❤9👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @knowledgebenefits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fawāid” (@knowledgebenefits), 459 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knowledgebenefits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.