3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 280–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 16:22
280
-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:32
281
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:07
281
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
78.8%
avg views ÷ 280 subscribers
Avg views / post
221
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
11 (3 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,765
Reactions total
115
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
197 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
84
42.6%
custom 5362055833406441698
36
18.3%
❤🔥
35
17.8%
custom 5287404392654319394
21
10.7%
🫡
8
4.06%
custom 5206318837489743801
7
3.55%
custom 5382026293166489702
3
1.52%
🔥
3
1.52%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @knorrart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🫡 Почему я не верю в то что ии заменит нас. Дешевле будет нанимать аниматоров/художников из мяса. Парам пам пам.
И это чем дальше тем дороже будет...
При этом сомнительное качество. Зашквар в среде художников. И все это еще и палится с 1 раза 🙈
Лучше бы все эти деньги на что то путное пустили, а не вот эти вот датацентры 🫠
Поэтому учимся, учимся ручками делать ,)
Как вам? Вчера взбодрила аудиторию сменой образа. Не буду скрывать, что подумываю иногда о тотал блонде, но предпочитаю аккуратно подходить к таким радикальным переменам. Волосы то растут, а вот качество потом восстанавливается годами. Хорошо, что можно кастомизировать свой образ «под разные задачи🤭» с помощью парика. Для съемок и Вау эффекта вообще топ. Может и на творческом аккаунте остаться блондинкой 🤔
Портфолио ✨
Многие интересуются оформлением, я его честно говоря собираю на коленке , прям на айпаде, не люблю всякие фигмы и прочее, жизни в таких кейсах нет
Писи: делала превью работ, а вышел полноценный артбук🥹
Заканчиваю обновление портфолио. На этапе сборки пришла к такому выводу: теория «бить в одну стилистику», конечно, рабочая, но она не работает с концептерами. Пообщавшись с людьми из индустрии, понимаю, что умение работать с большим количеством стилистик дает мне огромное преимущество. Теперь мой главный страх — не отказ, а как выбрать тех, с кем сотрудничать на перспективу.
Мне так нравится эта фотография, я тут прям в своем истинном воплощении, хз как сказать короче вот настоящая я 😁🐹 И не отпускает мысль создать каких нибудь круглых жирненьких милых кото-хомяков, не знаю пока как это будет выглядеть 🐾
Вы правда поверили, что нет новых работ?) Но ради правды она сыровата, так как делала на скоростях. Уезжаю в заслуженный отпуск и в этот раз без компа)
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @knorrart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Knorr Art ✍🏼🤍” (@knorrart), 280 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knorrart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
