Channel
@knizhnaya_krysa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002682290687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @knizhnaya_krysa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/knizhnaya_krysa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 33 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 32 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 33 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 32 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 32 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 72.3% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 12.3% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 🤓 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как вы понимаете, отзыв писала я давно. Книга уже вышла в издательстве, и я её полистала. Ну что могу сказать? Майк стал Микой (даже не Миком). Вот в таких реалиях нынче живем. Книгу читала в оригинале. Очень легко написана. Могу порекомендовать для тех, кто давно уже хотел прочитать книгу на английском, но боялся - простая лексика и небольшая форма. В общем, выбирайте сами. Но я расстроена. Даже не столько тем, ч…
❤5
Two Can Play Али Хейзелвуд Вот-вот в МИФе наконец-то выйдет новинка от Али Хейзелвуд - Two can play. И оно вам надо. Для меня Али Хейзелвуд - уже как знакомая гавань, куда я могу вернуться и встретить хорошую историю любви. Так и тут. — Ты знаешь, что такое «limerence»? — Нет. — Это безответная любовь. Желание того, кого тебе никогда не получить. Было такое? Two can play - это небольшая новелла. Но даже в таком о…
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
Вы же не думали, что я так быстро отстану от данного произведения? Пы.Сы.: тут будет многа букавак Короче, я вновь включу старую бабку и побухчу на романтизацию. Автор не против выпуска мерча по своим книгам. И вот до прочтения Лент и ножей мы уже немного соприкоснулись с мерчом. Дело было в том, что выходила книга в другой серии и она, о ужас, должна была подвергнуться цензуре в виде чёрных полосок. Опустим теори…
❤3
Центральным конфликтом стала церковь. А именно религиозный фанатизм, который приводит к насилию прикрытому верой. И вот наш серый волк карает таких ужасных священнослужителей. Ууууу. Но 1) их было всего двое; 2) убили их не за то, что они отвратительно себя вели по отношению к людям, а потому что они отвратительно вели себя по отношению к Маре; 3) показали ли нам последствия религиозного фанатизма? лицемерия? нет. Ни…
❤3
🎀Ленты и ножи Лена Сокол Сотрите мне память, чтобы я это забыла... Если кратко - плохо. Я даже не знаю, как начать этот отзыв. Книгу прочитала месяц назад, переваривала, обсуждала и сейчас уже нет желания уделять ей время. Но не в моих правилах (ну или понятиях) сказать "плохо" и не прокомментировать почему. Книга подается нам как дарк-роман (и, простите, тру-крайм). И как же сильно хочется, чтобы наши русс…
🎀Ленты и ножи Лена Сокол
❤3
А я тут с отзывом бегу к вам
Соскучились?
❤5
Предлагаю и вовсе запретить экономику! Она очень вредная (особенно для меня...)
💅4❤2🤓1
Маленькие дети! Ни за что на свете В книжный не ходите Макро покупать! Продвинутая макроэкономика — это то еще вещество, изменяющее сознание. Стоит только в ней прокачаться, как вдруг начинаешь смотреть на мир по-другому. Иногда эффект седативный, а иногда вызывает эйфорию. Так что будьте аккуратнее и предупредите всех, чтобы даже не прикасались к учебникам по продвинутой макре! https://t.me/memesdotorg/15936 Я пр…
❤2💅2😁2🤓1
И вот вам ещё пример
❤3😁3💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @knizhnaya_krysa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжная к(р)ыса” (@knizhnaya_krysa), 33 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knizhnaya_krysa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.