Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Klyros | Web3

@klyrosalpha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,288subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002219707128
TypeChannel
Username@klyrosalpha
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/klyrosalpha

Growth

1,2881,2991,293.57 August 2026 — 1,299 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,299 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,293 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,288 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,286–1,301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:041,288-5
10 Aug 2026, 14:511,293-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:201,299no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:471,299first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍌4729.2%
💊4226.1%
custom 53413695443320260664125.5%
🦄3119.3%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @klyrosalpha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 November 2025 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2026, 09:22 UTC513 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @klyroslifePhoto

Последний день марта, пора подвести итоги🖥️ Сразу спойлер: месяц закрыт в минус, причем достаточно неприятный Торговал также классику, полимаркет, манипулятивные токены, отталкиваясь от ончейна, стакана. Напроебываться везде успел Причем порой так глупо я поступаю, из-за чего происходят лузы. Все прямо перед глазами, что-то не увидел, что-то пропустил из-за обстоятельств, а потом на каком-то говне ректанулся, грус

custom 53413695443320260664🍌3🦄1

3 Mar 2026, 17:36 UTC766 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Плохой рынок — учись, дружище🤩 Меня попросили замолвить словечко о новом курсе по вайбкодингу, я и не против, зная, что любители кода тут есть Иногда на таком рынке рассказывать про крипту нынче сложно, активность падает, а нарративы пока не меняются Но не обязательно быть дегеном, чтобы работать в этой криптовалюте, ведь можно работать за зп или билдить свои проекты, и я смотрю придержанцев такого в моем паблике

custom 53413695443320260664🍌2💊2

27 Feb 2026, 16:42 UTC568 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🍌4🦄2custom 53413695443320260662

26 Feb 2026, 19:05 UTC507 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Аксиомовские говнюки рассекречены, а шортить нечего😳 7 дней с прошлого поста прошло, как же время пролетает это пиздец, но ни дня мой второй канал не пустовал, как и говорил, иду к 30и дневному стрику 😉 Седня ZachXBT дропнул свое расследование в твиттере по инсайдерской торговле, все уже думаю это слышали Включал уведы на твитак и парсеры по нему, сидел с иишкой на готове, но дропнул он вечером, когда я был на пар

🍌4💊2custom 53413695443320260662

20 Feb 2026, 09:01 UTC452 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рекап 14% от этого года Да, уже прошло 14% с начала 2026, а я все не написал не единого поста👎 Сейчас, этим спокойным свободным утречком(мейн мекса отлетел в рк с нихуя), сижу на толчке и пишу этот пост На самом деле грустно осознавать, что так сильно выпал с медийки и так тяжело к ней возвращаться. Тяжело, но хочется За начало этого года пока почти ничего не сделано, в работу вернулся буквально неделю назад и по

🍌14💊8🦄7

31 Dec 2025, 15:15 UTC777 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Последний день в этом году, мыслей миллион.. Год выдался остносительно хорошим, много сделано за этот год, многое понято, многое изменено Начало года было горящим, горящим как искра, и глаза мои горели. Зима, весна, лето выдались очень хорошими, июнь вообще выделился больше всех, лучший месяц в котором было атх по банку и заработку Но под конец года я как-то расслабился, последний квартал выдался грустным, сонливы

🦄5💊3

29 Dec 2025, 15:12 UTC674 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Эй, нигер, у тебя на новый год то денег хватает? Если нет, то пора вывести свои зеленые, только аккуратно, без палева Как говорится на утро usdt, а вечером вывел кеш налом, мальчишки и девчонки, гаааз обмениваться, а то че то грустненько как-то😭 Понятное дело все выводят кеш под конец года на всякие нужны, но как выводят. Недавно видел свежий опрос, касательно того, как люди в конце 2025-го выводят крипту в фиат.

💊5custom 53413695443320260663

27 Dec 2025, 09:34 UTC631 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новая промка от Bitget Wallet на $100k🤩 Уже пару раз писал о битгете тут и тут, 25 декабря стартовал новый Fomo Thursdays 2.0 Долго фомо четверга не было, решили все пересмотреть и запустить получше. Сейчас первый фомо после такого застоя, поэтому ревард сейчас достойный — $100k В этот раз суть такая, что за задания с прокрутом объема мы будем получать карточки, за которые можем получить ревард. Если выполнить все

custom 53413695443320260668🍌5💊5

26 Dec 2025, 15:16 UTC512 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Такое образование тебе точно должно зайти😈 11 лет школы, 4+ года университета, как же томительно. И тебе не кайф и импакта не особо как-то Как хорошо, что есть места, в которые ты на год приходишь, пропадаешь и возвращаешься убийцей, например Guide DAO С этими ребятами начал сотрудничать и обязан рассказать вам о них, открыть глаза на образование так сказать Представь, что ты ходишь в школу, но не в такую скучную

custom 53413695443320260665

25 Dec 2025, 19:02 UTC369 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FlipperbodenhonPhoto

Воспоминания NFTишного Флиппера. 4 Года в Крипте - Я ухожу?!... Вот и пришло время рассказать все то, что происходило со мной за 4 года в крипте и подвести итоги уходящего 2025 года Большой ОПЫТ Большие Профиты и Проигрыши Ошибки Смешные и грустные истории Все, что вам нужно знать обо мне Вы найдете именно в этой статье https://teletype.in/@bodenhon/MemoriesoftheNFTflipper https://teletype.in/@bodenhon/Memoriesof

custom 53413695443320260665

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @klyrosalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,182,660 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Klyros | Web3” (@klyrosalpha), 1,288 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klyrosalpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.