Channel
@kluch_svoboda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002106596099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kluch_svoboda |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kluch_svoboda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:48 | 187 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 185 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 184 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 188 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 188 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 62.0% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 25.3% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 3.33% | |
| custom 5271887539102295688 | 4 | 2.67% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.00% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.00% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.33% | |
| custom 5458799228719472718 | 1 | 0.667% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.667% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не всем будет нравиться, как ярко ты светишь. Обязательно найдётся тот, кому захочется сделать тебя потише. Поскромнее. Поудобнее. Чтобы ты не выделялась, не привлекала столько внимания, не раздражала своей уверенностью, красотой, сексуальностью, успехом или просто тем, что тебе хорошо. Потому что чужой свет иногда бесит сильнее, чем собственная темнота. Но это вообще не твоя проблема. Ты не обязана уменьшать ярк…
🔥7❤3🥰1
У меня вчера была интересная история про дождь. Забежала к знакомым забрать письма. Ну и немного посидели, чай попили. А за окном тем временем сгущались тучи, сверкала молния, и было понятно: дождь может начаться в любую минуту. Я решила, что пора домой. Мне предложили зонт, но я отказалась. Доверилась своим ощущениям. А потом подумала: если все-таки начнется ливень, тоже отлично. Поставлю телефон на штатив в каку…
❤5💯1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4❤1
Мужчина пришёл с болью, которая знакома многим: отношения с бывшей женой стали холодными, а с дочерью общение практически прекратилось. Он хотел понять, почему так произошло и можно ли это изменить. Во время диагностики мы искали причины. Оказалось, что за внешним конфликтом скрывались совсем другие вещи: • ощущение, что всё нужно тянуть самому; • запрет принимать любовь, заботу и поддержку; • привычка откладывать …
❤5🔥4⚡3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4⚡2custom 52718875391022956881
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4custom 52718875391022956883🥰1
Сегодня вечером проводим живой эксперимент в эфире! 🧪 Представьте: человек приходит с личным «затыком», а мы в прямом эфире разбираем его ситуацию по косточкам и находим подлинный механизм проблемы. Что здесь происходит для каждого из нас? 👁 Если вы просто смотрите: • Это возможность честно взглянуть на себя со стороны. • Чужие истории всегда подсвечивают наши собственные затыки в деньгах, отношениях и здоровь…
❤4🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3🔥1
Как я тебе благодарна за всё. За поддержку, за твои советы❤️ Я люблю тебя
❤5💋2
Ну и как же без сорок))) Кто знает, почему у меня сороки - хороший знак, ставьте 🔥
❤6🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kluch_svoboda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свобода быть собой | Евгения” (@kluch_svoboda), 187 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kluch_svoboda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.