File, posted without a caption

Channel
История книжного клуба.
@klubhuev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002463659211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @klubhuev |
| Description | Ознакомительная информация |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/klubhuev |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 54 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 54 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.7%
- avg views ÷ 54 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.1
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.55%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (3 August 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 257 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 125
- Links
- 56
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🏆 Голосование завершено! 🥇 Победитель: 📖 Общество потребления ✍️ Жан Бодрийар 👤 Предложил: Denis ⭐ 84 баллов 📊 Остальные номинанты: 🥈 Фрагменты речи влюбленного. — ✍️ Ролан Барт. — ⭐ 82 баллов 🥉 Женщина французского лейтенанта — ✍️ Джон Фаулз — ⭐ 79 баллов 4. тридцатая любовь марины — ✍️ владимир сорокин — ⭐ 72 баллов 5. Исповедь — ✍️ Аврелий Августин — ⭐ 71 баллов 6. Жареные зелёные помидоры в кафе "Полуста…
#рецензия на "Защиту Лужина" Владимира Набокова от @svetavomisareg Роман заставил ощутить что такое и талант, и одержимость, и в какой-то мере зависимость даже одновременно. Мне все время по ходу чтения романа было интересно, почему мы не знаем имени Лужина,.. да и книга начинается с того, как ему дали это имя «Лужин, теперь тебя будут звать по фамилии, как отца». А в итоге один раз мы узнали его имя Александр Ивано…
#рецензия на "Защиту Лужина" Владимира Набокова от @sorc4 Половина книги мне понравилась, вторая не очень, но все равно читать интересно. Первая книга Набокова что я прочитал. Ждал шахматных баталий, спорта, драмы, а получил скучные светские вечера буржуазии. Лужин очень слабый человек. Вместо того чтобы хотябы попытаться найти другое дело всей жизни, он не делает нихуя. Просто течет по течению. Жирный ленивый уебок…
#рецензия на "Защиту Лужина" Владимира Набокова от @ssddfffgg Вот вам для начала начало: Больше всего его поразило то, что с понедельника он будет Лужиным. Его отец — настоящий Лужин, пожилой Лужин, Лужин, писавший книги,— вышел от него, улыбаясь, потирая руки, уже смазанные на ночь прозрачным английским кремом, и своей вечерней замшевой походкой вернулся к себе в спальню. Жена лежала в постели. Она приподнялась и …
🔥1
#рецензия на "Защиту Лужина" Владимира Набокова от @holo447 Набоков не спешит. Он никогда не спешит. Абзац о детской комнате длится страницу; перечисление вещей на даче - ещё одну; шахматная партия описывается не ходами, а состояниями воздуха вокруг ходов, температурой пальцев, скрипом стула, случайной мухой на зелёном сукне. Тягучесть прозы здесь не орнамент, а сама тема романа: как Лужин тонет в частностях, так и …
#рецензия на "Защиту Лужина" Владимира Набокова от @YTH_MHW Эту книгу я прочитал почти взахлёб. По ощущениям она напомнила мне фильм Birdman: то же непрерывное движение вперёд, словно без монтажных склеек, тот же нарастающий темп и ощущение неотвратимости. С каждой страницей напряжение закручивается всё сильнее, возникает чувство, что события уже невозможно остановить, что они движутся по собственной траектории. А з…
File, posted without a caption
#читаем Владимир Набоков "Защита Лужина"
🏆 Голосование завершено! 🥇 Победитель: 📖 Защита Лужина ✍️ Владимир Набоков 👤 Предложил: Светлана ⭐ 74 баллов 📊 Остальные номинанты: 🥈 Замок — 72 баллов 🥉 Человек без свойств — 67 баллов 4. Комары — 63 баллов 5. Когда Ницше плакал — 57 баллов 6. Хищные вещи века — 57 баллов 7. Черная линия — 54 баллов 8. Жажда жизни — 46 баллов 9. Игры в которые играют люди. Люди которые играют в игры. — 42 баллов 10. Мастер и Мар…
#рецензия на "Град Обреченный" Аркадия и Бориса Стругацких от @Kertar ээээ номер 2? https://uissoll.medium.com/test-6e52099492a6
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @klubhuev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 972,685 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“История книжного клуба.” (@klubhuev), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klubhuev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.