Channel
@klint_klintone
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001749500361 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @klint_klintone |
| Created | 17 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/klint_klintone |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 160 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 162 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 162 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 4 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 5 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мне кажется, что войну на Ближнем Востоке развязал ВАЗ! Помните слоган: "Можно! А зачем?"? АвтоВАЗ запускает цепочку банкротств целого пула автогигантов, в результате все зарубежные производители автомобилей несут колоссальные убытки и разоряются! АвтоВАЗ в Дамках!
👏3💯1
Все по факту.
🤯1
В кадре головное судно на воздушной подушке (СВП) «Волжский-1» проекта 23730. Судно построено нижегородским судостроительным предприятием «ЦКБ по СПК имени Р.Е. Алексеева» и является первым СВП в современной истории компании. Судно оснащено просторным салоном на 24 человек с панорамным обзором и и может развивать скорость до 90 км/ч. @mediapaluba
👍2
Сууууууукааа 🤣
Женщина подала в суд на мужика, идет процесс. Судья спрашивает: — Зачем вы отправили потерпевшей дикпик? — Это не дикпик, это мой банан, ваша честь — То есть, вы утверждаете, что на этом фото – ваш банан? — Да, ваша честь. Судья удалился в комнату для вынесения решения. Через некоторое время возвращается: — Подсудимый признается виновным и приговаривается к 3 годам колонии и штрафу в 1 млн рублей. — За что?! — Подсуд…
😁1
В качестве аргумента за блокировку Telegram и принудительный перевод россиян в другое приложение иногда ссылаются на пример Китая и его мессенджера WeChat. Но это сравнение ошибочно. WeChat не назначали «национальным мессенджером» и не навязывали людям. Он стал абсолютным лидером в свободной конкурентной борьбе начала 2010-х, предложив китайским пользователям лучший сервис из десятков претендентов (среди которых был…
Говорящая фамилия
Ровно 19 лет назад в Мюнхене прозвучали слова, которые тогда назвали "оскорбительным вызовом", а сегодня - пророчеством. На трибуне конференции Владимир Путин появился с текстом, который правил лично перед выходом. Говорил без дипломатических экивоков. Как отмечали участники, язык речи был не политическим, а почти юридическим: со ссылками на Устав ООН и международное право, которые перестали работать. Это была та са…
❤3👏1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @klint_klintone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клинт Клинтон” (@klint_klintone), 160 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klint_klintone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.