Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Запуск в соцсетях на 1 млн+ с Артемом и Асей

Channel

Запуск в соцсетях на 1 млн+ с Артемом и Асей

@klienty_zapusk

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002097468938
TypeChannel
Username@klienty_zapusk
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 3 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/klienty_zapusk

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Artem_Sarapulov/1916 May 2024, 09:46 UTC@klienty_zapusk/122 · this entry6 May 2024, 09:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@Artem_Sarapulov/19517 Jun 2024, 16:45 UTC@klienty_zapusk/125 · this entry17 Jun 2024, 16:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@Artem_Sarapulov/19317 Jun 2024, 16:44 UTC@klienty_zapusk/126 · this entry17 Jun 2024, 16:46 UTC1.0072 seconds
@klienty_zapusk/127 · this entry15 Jul 2024, 07:13 UTC@Artem_Sarapulov/19615 Jul 2024, 07:22 UTC1.009 minutes
@klienty_zapusk/138 · this entry12 Aug 2024, 11:52 UTC@Artem_Sarapulov/20112 Aug 2024, 11:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@klienty_zapusk/140 · this entry21 Aug 2024, 09:34 UTC@Artem_Sarapulov/20921 Aug 2024, 09:36 UTC1.002 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Artem_Sarapulov7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9972 secondsthis entry (4–3)
@uniqurs7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992 minutesthis entry (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 May 2024 to 21 August 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @uniqurs. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4749487 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers21 August 2026 — 48 subscribers13 September 2026 — 47 subscribers22 October 2026 — 48 subscribers7 August 202622 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 76 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 05:5048+1
13 Sept 2026, 17:4247-1
21 Aug 2026, 20:2748-1
10 Aug 2026, 12:1649no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:3849first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥956.3%
👍425.0%
❤318.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2024 to 21 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2024, 09:34 UTC122 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Уже завтра 🔥 Хочешь стать востребованным мастером и экспертом? 🔥 22 августа (четверг) | Экосистема востребованности в мире продвижения | Метро Бауманская Тебе знакомы эти проблемы? * Клиенты благодарят, но не покупают? * Не можешь продать работу в длинную? * Сложно определиться с нишей и позиционированием? * Клиенты тебя не понимают? * Сарафанное радио не растет? Я помогу тебе: * Разработать стратегию продвиже…

15 Aug 2024, 16:21 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

12 Aug 2024, 11:52 UTC129 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

22 августа (четверг) | Экосистема востребованности в мире продвижения | Метро Бауманская Оффлайн-мероприятие для роста вашей востребованности для мастеров и экспертов, на котором разберетесь: * Почему не получается продать клиенту работу в длинную * Почему они благодарят, но не покупают * Почему сложно определиться с нишей и позиционированием * Почему клиенты вас не понимают * Почему сарафанное радио не растет Моя …

🔥3

9 Aug 2024, 08:22 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Знаете, что меня удивило после вчерашнего эфира (на самом деле - нет 😀)? Количество сообщений в лс просто зашкаливает! Кажется, тема рилс вас зацепила. Видимо, многие из вас уже почувствовали, что за короткими роликами — будущее. И не зря! Статистика показывает, что просмотры растут в геометрической прогрессии. Но давайте начистоту: кто из вас уже пробовал снимать рилс? Получалось ли привлечь новую аудиторию? Или, м…

🔥1

7 Aug 2024, 17:32 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Уже завтра в 12.00 @artemsg Артём проведет эфир «Заявки через рилс»🔥🔥🔥 ✅Что это за магия такая вне Хогвартса😀 когда 1 рилс приносит 15 заявок ✅Стоит ли снимать трендовые рилсы ✅Какая воронка из рилс сейчас работает и как ее простроить И многое другое ! Конечно же разбор рилсов , самых смелых - так что готовьте ссылочки на свои видео 😎 Встречаемся здесь в 12.00. https://t.me/prodazi_sarapulovu Ждете ?🔥

🔥1

7 Aug 2024, 08:09 UTC54 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вот такое сообщение пришло мне с утра 😳 Именно в тот день , когда я собираюсь писать контент для ВАС🔥 Не упустите шанс! От вас необходимо здесь в чате: https://t.me/prodazi_sarapulovu 1. Ссылка на Инстаграм/Телеграм 2. Что хотите : серию сторис /идею для рилса/ контент план на 3-5 дней И забрать новые идеи , погнали 🚀🚀🚀

🔥1

5 Aug 2024, 09:30 UTC56 viewsread 10 August 2026

Всем привет ! В чате выложила идею еще 1-го трендового рилс 😎 Классно будет внедрить с друзьями, очень простая съемка. Есть спонтанная идея понакидовать вам в чате: https://t.me/prodazi_sarapulovu https://t.me/prodazi_sarapulovu https://t.me/prodazi_sarapulovu идеи для контента (рилс, сторис, пост). Кто хочет поучаствовать ? Ставьте реакцию 🔥

2 Aug 2024, 09:15 UTC63 viewsread 10 August 2026

Рилс — это магия или наука? Вчерашний пост вызвал фурор в личных сообщениях! Столько откликов, столько энтузиазма — я в восторге от вашей реакции. Видно, что тема трендовых рилс вас зацепила. Давайте только договоримся - пишите и здесь в чате, а не только мне в лс 🔥Чтобы мотивировать и других. А знаете, что меня особенно радует? То, что многие из вас не просто хотят получать готовые ролики, но и создавать свои. Это…

16 Jul 2024, 11:48 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

БУДУ ЧИТАТЬ ЛЕКЦИЮ ПО ПРОДВИЖЕНИЮ В АКАДЕМИИ ДИЗАЙНА ЖИЗНИ

❤1

16 Jul 2024, 11:48 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Лектор Артем Сарапулов 25 ИЮЛЯ в 10.00 Тема: "Разблокировка экспертности" Лекцию читает: ⭐ Продюсер ⭐ Предприниматель с 2008 года, развиваю бизнесы в России ⭐ Провел более 3000 часов консультаций по целям, стратегиям и систематизации Лекция повысит ваши осознание: ✔ Какой формат продвижение может сделать из вас узнаваемым на улице ✔ Какой социальной сети отдать предпочтение в 2024-2030гг ✔ Что нужно сейчас уже на…

❤2👍1🔥1

15 Jul 2024, 07:13 UTC85 viewsread 10 August 2026

#ищуэксперта 🤝 Сейчас я обновляю свою программу, и мне нужно провести 3 глубинных интервью со своей ЦА❗️ План такой: Я получаю новые продающие смыслы. Ты - конкретные рекомендации и крутой план действий для увеличения заявок из блога 🔥 Кто подойдет для интервью: Эксперты с твердыми знаниями в мягких нишах и доходом 100-300к, которые уже ведут свои соц сети и хотят сделать запуск на 1 млн. Уже есть несколько кейс…

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @klienty_zapusk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Запуск в соцсетях на 1 млн+ с Артемом и Асей” (@klienty_zapusk), 48 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klienty_zapusk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.