Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сделано в КЛБР

Channel

Сделано в КЛБР

@klbrstudio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

256subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001807647800
TypeChannel
Username@klbrstudio
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/klbrstudio

Growth

255256255.57 August 2026 — 256 subscribers8 August 2026 — 255 subscribers8 August 2026 — 255 subscribers15 August 2026 — 256 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 255–256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:04256+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:18255no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:30255-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:08256first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 1 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.1%
avg views ÷ 256 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (1 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total508
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

294 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9833.3%
🔥8629.3%
❤‍🔥3411.6%
custom 52355640987368906543110.5%
😱144.76%
👍72.38%
👏72.38%
😍72.38%
💔51.70%
🥰31.02%
custom 523356701195869707820.68%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @klbrstudio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC86 views12 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

🤑 Вера завела threads. Подписывайтесь

🔥10👍1🥰1

27 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC192 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Зумеров не существует 👀 Ну, почти. На связи 🤑 Вера — написала колонку для Т‑Бизнес секретов про теорию поколений. Спойлер: она не работает, а бизнес, который в неё верит, теряет деньги. 28-летний айтишник из Москвы и 28-летний врач из райцентра — формально одно поколение. По факту разные планеты: доход, тревожность, привычки, вообще все. Откуда взялись ярлыки «зумер» и «миллениал», почему возраст сам по себе нич

custom 523556409873689065414❤‍🔥9

20 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC230 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья и коллеги, мы столкнулись с мошенничеством от лица нашего бренда. Как отличить фейковые предложения: Каждого нанимаемого специалиста я собеседую лично по софтам, и только затем подключается команда. Никакого «HR-а Григория/Глеба/NICK-а» на аутсорсе у нас нет и никогда не было. Если сомневаетесь — напишите мне в личку! К слову, актуальной вакансии на фронта в текущий момент нет, но скоро появится в связи с рас

😱14

8 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC246 views30 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Мы вошли в Рейтинги Рунета 2026 🫡 Немного с опозданием, но все же поделимся. Для нас это не столько строчка в списке, сколько подтверждение того, что проекты, над которыми мы работаем каждый день, заметны рынку и соответствуют высоким требованиям отрасли. К слову, в Рейтинге мы участвуем с 2021 года и планируем продолжать. И, конечно, однажды (а может, и не однажды), войти в десятку лучших студий в этих сегментах.

16🔥7😍7

19 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTC270 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️

🔥15💔52custom 52335670119586970781custom 52355640987368906541

18 Jun 2026, 12:51 UTC273 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

...тем временем мы написали статью про теорию поколений и почему она, в некотором смысле, провальна. А у нас стартует месяц контента от Иосифа 🫡 , нашего кофаундера и арт-директора.

15🔥1🥰1custom 52335670119586970781

18 Jun 2026, 12:50 UTC360 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🤑 Как работать с зумерами 50% нашей команды – люди, рожденные после 2000 года. И я, конечно, тоже вижу эти рилсы: не хотят работать, боятся созвонов, пьют капучинку на кокосовом и увольняются после первой негативной обратной связи. Поэтому нафиг с ними работать, нанимайте миллениалов. Но вообще я все меньше верю в разговоры про «плохое поколение». И проблема, имхо, не в зумерах миллениалах или иксах. А в том, что

16🔥4custom 52355640987368906544

1 Jun 2026, 11:01 UTC266 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩷 Вера раздает базу Топ исследований, которые мы читаем в КЛБР, чтобы не изобретать велосипед. Листайте карточки и сохраняйте себе.

🔥1511custom 52355640987368906548

26 May 2026, 18:56 UTC291 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что происходит в студии 🤑 Привет, на связи Вера. Начинается эра Рейтинга Рунета, плюс мы заполняем карточку агентства на Рувард. Эти рейтинги не первый год поддерживает нашу маркетинговую стратегию и заставляют больше узнать о себе. Параллельно систематизируем все знания о нас, собираем большой пакет наград с 2021 по 2026 годы, актуализируем сайт, дописываем посадочные страницы. Прежние победы на Руварде побудили н

❤‍🔥176🥰1

18 May 2026, 10:16 UTC532 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Маленьким командам вроде нас сложно крикнуть громче гигантов 🤑 Но Рейтинг Рунета дает возможность доказать свою компетентность цифрами. Показать, что мы делаем большие, крутые проекты плечом к плечу с топами рынка. В 2020-м мы впервые пришли в Рейтинг Рунета и сразу заняли 2-е место среди разработчиков Next.js и 14-е в React. А теперь мы: 1-е в рейтинге агентств по созданию сайтов на Express.js 2-е в рейтинге разв

18🔥11👍6

8 May 2026, 08:49 UTC287 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, мы созрели сказать вслух непопулярную вещь про ИИ 🦾 Собрали мысли в статью. Если коротко: бизнес массово внедряет нейросети ради эффективности, а на выходе получает обратный эффект — сотрудники перестают думать, стратегии становятся одинаковыми, а клиенты уходят, потому что чувствуют, что общаются с автоматом. В статье разобрали на реальных кейсах 4 механизма, которыми ИИ незаметно «выдавливает» уникальнос

14🔥6custom 52355640987368906544

1 May 2026, 09:47 UTC306 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кейс МНР: где заканчиваются соцсети и начинается сайт Принесли кейс про то, как мы помогли блогеру упаковать бизнес в сайт, который продолжает работать там, где соцсети заканчиваются. «Миллион на ремонте» — агентство инвестиционной недвижимости, основательница которого, Екатерина Фролова, ведёт один из крупнейших блогов об инвестициях в недвижимость в инстаграме. К нам ребята пришли в момент, когда бренд переосмыс

🔥17❤‍🔥8👏7

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @klbrstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,117,687 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сделано в КЛБР” (@klbrstudio), 256 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klbrstudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.