Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

_ 着る 🥨 𝑲ℓ𐐼x𑄜n ! . +

@klaxonoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003939094012
TypeChannel
Username@klaxonoi
DescriptionKlaxon [klaxon] — онлайн группа с прототипом i-dle ! оформление — @hel1lim Связаться по любым вопросам - @anon_klaxon_anon_oi_bot набор открыт, пиар запрещен!!
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 19 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/klaxonoi

Growth

3410 Aug 2026, 09:46 — 34 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:32 — 34 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:4611 Aug 2026, 00:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:3234no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:4634first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
40
Videos
16
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53708440451636476232615.5%
custom 52266417637409574722414.3%
custom 53078474319609385772414.3%
custom 53935033906742101262414.3%
custom 53593779341822853292112.5%
custom 51971850827286576002011.9%
custom 52628328246243644521710.1%
custom 5307793706215031884127.14%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC55 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

`🔑. ׄ ۫New cover ! . 🌼 𝂅ׄ 🐌 🎀ֺ조용한 📖 설렘 🥹🤩 엘〃🤩 🎀Salvatore🎀꒰𝔏𑄜vᧉ U꒱ ː ( 🕊️ ) , Y𝕦m🥹yum ─ 🌟 ꒰ C𝕣eam 。 🗽 𑇛 𝗆𝗉𝟦  ᪲  › 🌙 : 🎀🎀 • . for Mistall . 🥹🎀🌟 (절) 📚 / Tʀᴜᴇ Yuqi ” 𓆇 ~ @klaxonoi

custom 52266417637409574722custom 52628328246243644522custom 53935033906742101262custom 51971850827286576001custom 53077937062150318841custom 53078474319609385771

1 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC58 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

`🔑. ׄ ۫New cover ! . 🌼 𝂅ׄ 🐌 🎀ֺ조용한 📖 설렘 🥹🤩 엘 〃🤩 🎀WMH🎀꒰ 𝔏𑄜vᧉ U ꒱ ː ( 🕊️ ) , Y𝕦m🥹yum ─ 🌟 ꒰ C𝕣eam 。 🗽 𑇛 𝗆𝗉𝟦  ᪲  › 🌙 : 🎀 🎀 • . for Misa . 🥹🎀🌟 (절) 📚 / Tʀᴜᴇ Soyeon ” 𓆇 ~ @klaxonoi

custom 53077937062150318845custom 52628328246243644523custom 53593779341822853293custom 51971850827286576002custom 53935033906742101262custom 53078474319609385771custom 53708440451636476231

25 Jun 2026, 18:17 UTC95 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⋆˚꩜🎀•🤍non 🤍hera & 🤍isa •🎀✮⋆˙” 📚 / Tʀᴜᴇ shuhua ”\Tʀᴜᴇ soyᴇon {pretty}🤍 🌟🔤RITE >>CC: CLOSE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ⋆˚꩜🎀•KLAXON ~ OFFICIAL•🎀✮⋆˙”

custom 51971850827286576002custom 52266417637409574722custom 53593779341822853292custom 52628328246243644521custom 53935033906742101261

25 Jun 2026, 09:55 UTC68 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

`🔑. ׄ ۫New cover ! . 🌼 𝂅ׄ 🐌 🎀ֺ조용한 📖 설렘 🥹🤩 엘 〃🎀🤩 🎀 who is she🎀꒰ 𝔏𑄜vᧉ U ꒱ ː ( 🕊️ ) , Y𝕦m🥹yum ─ 🌟 ꒰ C𝕣eam 。 🗽 𑇛 𝗆𝗉𝟦  ᪲  › 🌙 : 🎀 🎀 • . for chera . 🥹🎀🌟 (절) 📚 / Tʀᴜᴇ shuhua ” 𓆇 ~ @klaxonoi

custom 53078474319609385774custom 52266417637409574723custom 53077937062150318843custom 53593779341822853293

20 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTC88 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

— Ася позорище, клянусь. 🤩

custom 53935033906742101266custom 51971850827286576004custom 53078474319609385774custom 52266417637409574721custom 53077937062150318841custom 53593779341822853291custom 53708440451636476231

19 Jun 2026, 17:19 UTC98 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#NINA - Просили список кандидатов, а я вам так скажу, выбирать было РЕАЛЬНО очень сложно, я вам клянусь. Мы даже в последний момент с Асей кипели, прям сильно. Поэтому хочу сказать, что вы все очень талантливы! Безумно талантливые, и я не хочу никого обделять этим бессмысленным списком кандидатов. Мне самой очень обидно когда я не попадаю в какую-то группу, а ещё + пишут списки кандидатов где меня нету( Так что списк

custom 52628328246243644525custom 53078474319609385775custom 53708440451636476231

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @klaxonoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 373,094 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“_ 着る 🥨 𝑲ℓ𐐼x𑄜n ! . +” (@klaxonoi), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klaxonoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.