2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 283–285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Oct 2026, 22:22
284
no change
6 Oct 2026, 21:47
284
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
71.9%
avg views ÷ 284 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
19 (3 October 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
3,880
Reactions total
256
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
48
Videos
1
Links
337
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
256 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
38.7%
🔥
50
19.5%
🍾
20
7.81%
💘
17
6.64%
🤣
13
5.08%
👏
12
4.69%
🥰
11
4.30%
🥴
11
4.30%
🤯
8
3.13%
🤨
6
2.34%
👎
3
1.17%
💩
3
1.17%
🍓
2
0.781%
💋
1
0.391%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/kkpTyumen/430
Вообще если честно мне гораздо смешнее с того, как все его дружно отменяют, постоянно говорят прилюдно что Граф хуесос, а потом эти же люди спокойно ходят на его меро, честно говоря забавно наблюдать за такими людьми, как говорится или крестик снимите, или трусы наденьте
Те кому похуй и кто никогда не хотел лезть в эту залупу, претензий не имею
Прослушка | | тейк
Вот вы отменяли Графа. Насколько я помню, не один раз. Отменяли х*** тучу косплееров, ссылаясь на какие-то личные черты характера или поступки. И к чему это привело? Нет, серьёзно, хоть одному из отменённых людей запретили вход на какие-то мероприятия? Учитывая, что если ты не дебил, то просто указываешь другой ник и вот уже другой человек. Как вообще работает отмена в этом законченном комьюнити, где никто не знает н…
https://t.me/c/4427200263/6235
Честно говоря, я вообще не выкупаю в чём проблема придумать своего маскота Айдола, зачем брать других вообще. Я хз, мне может одной кажется, что в теме айдолов, ну просто бесконечный разгон для фантазии и собственных ос
Прослушка | | тейк
как можно назвать девочку из игры маскотом фестиваля, если прямого текста нет, что тематика феста связана с этой игрой и оттуда взят перс, тогда бы хоть как-то считалось за маскота
а так, хоть из звёздного дитя берите, они тоже айдолы
у айдол феста нет прямого связывающего к тому, что взяли этого перса, нет такого "фест посвящён то то тотому"
к художнику вопросов нет, он выполнял свою ран
Прослушка | | тейк
https://t.me/c/4427200263/6129
🌬️🌬️🌬️🌬️
Очень смешно) Красиво это где???Срисовать позу и обвести персонажа?добавить пару мазочков и использовать фон готовый???? Жалко смотреть как ее подружки ее защищают от очевидного слиза.
Прослушка | | тейк
Привет👋что там по правилам в косбендах? Какие считаете обязательные во всех косбендах? Какое самое странное /фриковатое встречали ?
Анон: мистер геев
Прослушка | | тейк
Кто рисовал баннер/аву для идол феста?Срочно ищем художника
Прослушка | | тейк
🤣10❤6🥰5🔥4🍓1💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kkpTyumen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Прослушка |Тюмень косплей комьюнити” (@kkpTyumen), 284 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkpTyumen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.